O PROTOCOLO DE NAGOYA E A REPARTIÇÃO DE BENEFÍCIOS DO ACESSO AO CONHECIMENTO TRADICIONAL ASSOCIADO NO BRASIL

Letícia Possenti, Gerusa Colombo
{"title":"O PROTOCOLO DE NAGOYA E A REPARTIÇÃO DE BENEFÍCIOS DO ACESSO AO CONHECIMENTO TRADICIONAL ASSOCIADO NO BRASIL","authors":"Letícia Possenti, Gerusa Colombo","doi":"10.36592/9786581110451-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research deals with the sharing of benefits resulting from access to traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity. The general objective is to verify the i nterna liza tion o f the Nagoya Protocol in the Brazilian legal system, with a focus on distinguishing the origins of t rad i t ional knowledge. In the first stage, the main rights l isted by the Nagoya Protocol are analyzed in relat ion to access and benefit sharing. Then, the concepts of associated traditional knowledge of identified, unidentified and unidentifiable origin are distinguished, according to the Protocol and Brazil ian legislation. Finally, Brazilian legislation is analyzed in the light o f the wo rd i ng o f the Pro tocol wi th regard to the right to share benefits in the event of knowledge of identified, unidentified and unidentifiable origin. The hypothetical-deductive method was used, with a bibl iographic and documentary research procedure, in the Protocol, Law No. 13,123 / 15 and Decree No. 8,772 / 2016. As a result, i t was found that the legislation is partial ly in l ine with the parameters of the Nagoya Protocol, since it leaves ample scope for regulation by the member states. In add i t ion, i t was found that the Protocol does not distinguish between traditional knowledge of iden tif ied , unident if ied and unidentifiable origin. Keyw ords: Biodiversity. Law 13123/15. Nagoya Protocol. Traditional knowledge.","PeriodicalId":135220,"journal":{"name":"Anais da VII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2020). Volume I","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da VII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2020). Volume I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36592/9786581110451-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research deals with the sharing of benefits resulting from access to traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity. The general objective is to verify the i nterna liza tion o f the Nagoya Protocol in the Brazilian legal system, with a focus on distinguishing the origins of t rad i t ional knowledge. In the first stage, the main rights l isted by the Nagoya Protocol are analyzed in relat ion to access and benefit sharing. Then, the concepts of associated traditional knowledge of identified, unidentified and unidentifiable origin are distinguished, according to the Protocol and Brazil ian legislation. Finally, Brazilian legislation is analyzed in the light o f the wo rd i ng o f the Pro tocol wi th regard to the right to share benefits in the event of knowledge of identified, unidentified and unidentifiable origin. The hypothetical-deductive method was used, with a bibl iographic and documentary research procedure, in the Protocol, Law No. 13,123 / 15 and Decree No. 8,772 / 2016. As a result, i t was found that the legislation is partial ly in l ine with the parameters of the Nagoya Protocol, since it leaves ample scope for regulation by the member states. In add i t ion, i t was found that the Protocol does not distinguish between traditional knowledge of iden tif ied , unident if ied and unidentifiable origin. Keyw ords: Biodiversity. Law 13123/15. Nagoya Protocol. Traditional knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《名古屋议定书》和巴西获得相关传统知识的利益分享
这项研究涉及分享因获取与生物多样性有关的传统知识而产生的惠益。总的目标是核查《名古屋议定书》在巴西法律制度中的国际地位,重点是区分《名古屋议定书》的起源和国家知识。第一阶段,分析《名古屋议定书》所列的与获取和惠益分享相关的主要权利。然后,根据议定书和巴西立法,区分了起源已查明、未查明和无法查明的相关传统知识的概念。最后,根据《议定书》关于在已查明、未查明和无法查明来源的知识的情况下分享利益的权利,分析了巴西的立法。在议定书、第13,123 / 15号法律和第8,772 / 2016号法令中,采用了假设-演绎方法,采用了圣经和文献研究程序。结果发现,该立法部分符合《名古屋议定书》的参数,因为它为成员国的监管留下了充分的空间。此外,还发现《议定书》没有区分起源已查明、未查明和无法查明的传统知识。关键词:生物多样性;法律13123/15。名古屋议定书。传统知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CIBERDEMOCRACIA E A CRISE DE REPRESENTATIVIDADE NO BRASIL: A PLURALIDADE DE VOZES NO AMBIENTE DEMOCRÁTICO POLÍTICAS JUDICIÁRIAS AO DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL À SEGURANÇA, DIGNIDADE E IGUALDADE ATRAVÉS DE DECISÕES JUDICIAIS ESTAVEIS A INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL À SERVIÇO DA DISCRIMINAÇÃO E DO PRECONCEITO EM NOME DA LEI E DA ORDEM PARA COMBATER O BOM COMBATE: A RELIGIÃO NO PROCESSO ELEITORAL BRASILEIRO A EXCESSIVA MEDICALIZAÇÃO DA INFÂNCIA: COLISÃO ENTRE O DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL À SAÚDE E O PRINCÍPIO DO MELHOR INTERESSE DA CRIANÇA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1