Building extreme right discourses on Twitter for non-campaign periods: insights from populist leaders across Europe

R. Rivas-de-Roca, Concha Pérez-Curiel, M. García-Gordillo
{"title":"Building extreme right discourses on Twitter for non-campaign periods: insights from populist leaders across Europe","authors":"R. Rivas-de-Roca, Concha Pérez-Curiel, M. García-Gordillo","doi":"10.15847/obsobs16420222176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing success of extreme right-wing populist parties changed the political state of play in Europe, which has been widely studied by the literature. Populist parties apply a particular communication style, based on simple and non-mediated messages on social media that promote distrust in public institutions. However, the ways in which these strategies are applied for non-campaigns weeks remain little addressed by academia, as well as its development in small countries. This study examines how far-right leaders from European countries with different sizes and historical extremist backgrounds used Twitter during a non-campaign period (29 September 2020 to 28 February 2021). Specifically, we analyze the issues (issue frame), strategies (game frame), and propaganda mechanisms employed through a mixture of quantitative and qualitative approaches. The sample includes the messages posted on Twitter (n=1346) by the leaders of the main far-right parties in France (Rassemblement National), Austria (FPÖ), Germany (AfD), Spain (Vox), and Portugal (Chega!). A manual content analysis was applied, allowing comparison of countries with different traditions regarding the Extreme Right. The results show a common pattern of anti-migration messages as the main topic for their communication style, but some differences are found in terms of agenda and propaganda. The most recent parties (AfD, Vox, and Chega!) rarely use Twitter tools, which means leaving behind the interactive capacity of social media; meanwhile, the agenda is less thematic in the Austrian and Portuguese cases. Our research contributes to discussions about the communication practices of far-right populist parties in Europe, identifying trends by country as the binary opposition between the people and the elite is not expressed through the same type of propaganda.","PeriodicalId":149155,"journal":{"name":"Observatorio (OBS*)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observatorio (OBS*)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15847/obsobs16420222176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing success of extreme right-wing populist parties changed the political state of play in Europe, which has been widely studied by the literature. Populist parties apply a particular communication style, based on simple and non-mediated messages on social media that promote distrust in public institutions. However, the ways in which these strategies are applied for non-campaigns weeks remain little addressed by academia, as well as its development in small countries. This study examines how far-right leaders from European countries with different sizes and historical extremist backgrounds used Twitter during a non-campaign period (29 September 2020 to 28 February 2021). Specifically, we analyze the issues (issue frame), strategies (game frame), and propaganda mechanisms employed through a mixture of quantitative and qualitative approaches. The sample includes the messages posted on Twitter (n=1346) by the leaders of the main far-right parties in France (Rassemblement National), Austria (FPÖ), Germany (AfD), Spain (Vox), and Portugal (Chega!). A manual content analysis was applied, allowing comparison of countries with different traditions regarding the Extreme Right. The results show a common pattern of anti-migration messages as the main topic for their communication style, but some differences are found in terms of agenda and propaganda. The most recent parties (AfD, Vox, and Chega!) rarely use Twitter tools, which means leaving behind the interactive capacity of social media; meanwhile, the agenda is less thematic in the Austrian and Portuguese cases. Our research contributes to discussions about the communication practices of far-right populist parties in Europe, identifying trends by country as the binary opposition between the people and the elite is not expressed through the same type of propaganda.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非竞选期间在Twitter上构建极右翼言论:来自欧洲各地民粹主义领导人的见解
极右翼民粹主义政党的日益成功改变了欧洲的政治格局,这一点已被文献广泛研究。民粹主义政党采用了一种特定的沟通风格,基于社交媒体上简单而无中介的信息,这些信息会助长对公共机构的不信任。然而,学术界对这些策略在非运动周的应用方式及其在小国的发展仍然很少涉及。本研究调查了来自不同规模和历史极端主义背景的欧洲国家的极右翼领导人在非竞选期间(2020年9月29日至2021年2月28日)如何使用Twitter。具体来说,我们通过定量和定性方法的混合分析问题(问题框架)、策略(游戏框架)和宣传机制。样本包括法国国民大议会(Rassemblement National)、奥地利(FPÖ)、德国(AfD)、西班牙(Vox)和葡萄牙(Chega!)等主要极右翼政党领导人在Twitter上发布的信息(n=1346)。采用了手工内容分析,以便对具有不同极右翼传统的国家进行比较。结果显示,两国在传播方式上均以反移民信息为主题,但在议程和宣传方面存在一定差异。最近的政党(AfD, Vox和Chega!)很少使用Twitter工具,这意味着放弃了社交媒体的互动能力;与此同时,在奥地利和葡萄牙的案例中,议程不那么具有主导性。我们的研究有助于讨论欧洲极右翼民粹主义政党的传播实践,确定各国的趋势,因为人民与精英之间的二元对立并没有通过同一类型的宣传来表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How is Portugal addressing disinformation? Results of a mapping of initiatives (2010-2023) Decoding algorithmic literacy among journalists Perceptions of University Students in Communication about Disinformation: Special Issue (2024) Media Literacy to Tackle Disinformation A taxonomy for Media Literacy in Portugal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1