USING PROXY SIMULATOR FOR RESERVOIR ZONE SELECTION AND REDUCING THE FORMATION TESTER CLEANUP OPERATIONAL TIME

A. Bertolini, V. Simoes, Marianna Dantas, P. Machado
{"title":"USING PROXY SIMULATOR FOR RESERVOIR ZONE SELECTION AND REDUCING THE FORMATION TESTER CLEANUP OPERATIONAL TIME","authors":"A. Bertolini, V. Simoes, Marianna Dantas, P. Machado","doi":"10.30632/SPWLA-2021-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The filtrate contamination cleanup time on a complex carbonate well using a traditional wireline formation tester (WFT) tool can vary from a couple of hours to over half a day. The method proposed aims at reducing operational time to collect a low-contamination formation fluid sample by determining regions with a smaller depth of invasion using a forward model simulation that considers static and dynamic formation properties to predict the radial profile of invasion. The mud filtrate invasion process was modeled considering the static and dynamic properties of the near-wellbore region in an industry reference reservoir simulator, and it integrates three mechanisms for fluid flow: Darcy’s law, material balance, and capillary pressure. The physical robustness of the reservoir simulator was united to a data-driven model to reduce the computational cost. This proxy model is based on a trained neural network with a broad range of scenarios to predict the numerical simulation results with high accuracy. The invasion estimation from the model is then used to predict the filtrate cleanup time using an industry consolidated numerical modeling. One of the variables influencing most of the cleanup time is the depth of mud filtrate invasion. Thus, reducing this time is a determinant for the WFT operational efficiency. The model for mud invasion has been successfully tested on a complex carbonate well, and the results for the depth of mud invasion were comparable to the results obtained with a commercial data-driven inversion using multiple resistivity channels. The estimated cleanup time using the results of depth of invasion predicted by the forward model has been compared and matched with real carbonate sampling stations, and there was a high correlation indicating that zones with lower depth of invasion required less cleanup time. Besides, using the history-matched cases, different WFT technologies such as single and radial probes, focused, unfocused, and dual-packer WFT inlets were evaluated, showing a high potential for reduction of operational time when properly planned and selected for the specific type of reservoir. The proposed methodology is a viable method for understanding the clean-up behavior in different reservoir scenarios using different WFT technologies. The innovation of this method relies on the data calibration using basic and advanced petrophysical properties through a data-driven model based on a trained neural network to reduce the uncertainty in the predicted invasion radial profile and the WFT cleanup time. The reliability on the theoretical results was increased using real data calibration, and this calibrated theoretical model has been used to guide the sampling depth selection, saving operational time.","PeriodicalId":153712,"journal":{"name":"SPWLA 62nd Annual Online Symposium Transactions","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPWLA 62nd Annual Online Symposium Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/SPWLA-2021-0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The filtrate contamination cleanup time on a complex carbonate well using a traditional wireline formation tester (WFT) tool can vary from a couple of hours to over half a day. The method proposed aims at reducing operational time to collect a low-contamination formation fluid sample by determining regions with a smaller depth of invasion using a forward model simulation that considers static and dynamic formation properties to predict the radial profile of invasion. The mud filtrate invasion process was modeled considering the static and dynamic properties of the near-wellbore region in an industry reference reservoir simulator, and it integrates three mechanisms for fluid flow: Darcy’s law, material balance, and capillary pressure. The physical robustness of the reservoir simulator was united to a data-driven model to reduce the computational cost. This proxy model is based on a trained neural network with a broad range of scenarios to predict the numerical simulation results with high accuracy. The invasion estimation from the model is then used to predict the filtrate cleanup time using an industry consolidated numerical modeling. One of the variables influencing most of the cleanup time is the depth of mud filtrate invasion. Thus, reducing this time is a determinant for the WFT operational efficiency. The model for mud invasion has been successfully tested on a complex carbonate well, and the results for the depth of mud invasion were comparable to the results obtained with a commercial data-driven inversion using multiple resistivity channels. The estimated cleanup time using the results of depth of invasion predicted by the forward model has been compared and matched with real carbonate sampling stations, and there was a high correlation indicating that zones with lower depth of invasion required less cleanup time. Besides, using the history-matched cases, different WFT technologies such as single and radial probes, focused, unfocused, and dual-packer WFT inlets were evaluated, showing a high potential for reduction of operational time when properly planned and selected for the specific type of reservoir. The proposed methodology is a viable method for understanding the clean-up behavior in different reservoir scenarios using different WFT technologies. The innovation of this method relies on the data calibration using basic and advanced petrophysical properties through a data-driven model based on a trained neural network to reduce the uncertainty in the predicted invasion radial profile and the WFT cleanup time. The reliability on the theoretical results was increased using real data calibration, and this calibrated theoretical model has been used to guide the sampling depth selection, saving operational time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用代理模拟器进行储层选择,减少地层测试器清理作业时间
在复杂的碳酸盐井中,使用传统的电缆地层测试(WFT)工具进行滤液污染清理的时间从几个小时到半天以上不等。该方法旨在通过考虑静态和动态地层特性的正演模型模拟来预测侵入的径向剖面,从而确定侵入深度较小的区域,从而减少收集低污染地层流体样本的操作时间。在一个行业参考油藏模拟器中,考虑了近井区域的静态和动态特性,对泥浆滤液侵入过程进行了建模,并集成了流体流动的三种机制:达西定律、物质平衡和毛细压力。油藏模拟器的物理鲁棒性与数据驱动模型相结合,降低了计算成本。该代理模型是基于经过训练的具有广泛场景的神经网络,对数值模拟结果进行高精度预测。然后,使用行业统一的数值模拟,将模型中的入侵估计用于预测滤液清理时间。影响大部分清理时间的变量之一是泥浆滤液侵入的深度。因此,减少这一时间是WFT操作效率的决定因素。泥浆侵入模型已在一口复杂的碳酸盐岩井中成功进行了测试,泥浆侵入深度的计算结果与利用多电阻率通道进行的商业数据驱动反演结果相当。利用正演模型预测的侵入深度估算的清理时间与实际碳酸盐采样站进行了比较和匹配,相关性较高,表明侵入深度较低的区域需要较少的清理时间。此外,使用历史匹配的案例,评估了不同的WFT技术,如单探头和径向探头,聚焦、非聚焦和双封隔器WFT入口,显示了在适当规划和选择特定类型油藏时,减少作业时间的巨大潜力。本文提出的方法是一种可行的方法,可用于了解不同WFT技术在不同油藏场景下的清理行为。该方法的创新之处在于,通过基于训练神经网络的数据驱动模型,利用基本和高级岩石物理特性进行数据校准,以减少预测侵入径向剖面的不确定性和WFT清理时间。通过实际数据标定,提高了理论结果的可靠性,并将标定后的理论模型用于指导采样深度的选择,节省了操作时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REAL-TIME ENSEMBLE-BASED WELL-LOG INTERPRETATION FOR GEOSTEERING USING HIGH FIDELITY CONTINUOUS CORE DATA FOR A FAST AND OBJECTIVE ESTIMATION OF RESERVOIR QUALITY A NEW LOOK AT THE DUAL DEPTH OF INVESTIGATION OF LWD PROPAGATION RESISTIVITY LOGGING DEEP-LEARNING-BASED AUTOMATED SEDIMENTARY GEOMETRY CHARACTERIZATION FROM BOREHOLE IMAGES REAL-TIME 2.5D INVERSION OF LWD RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS USING DEEP LEARNING FOR GEOSTEERING APPLICATIONS ACROSS FAULTED FORMATIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1