When Does an Employer Violate an Employee's Fourth Amendment Rights? Case Law and Applications

Theresa Zechman
{"title":"When Does an Employer Violate an Employee's Fourth Amendment Rights? Case Law and Applications","authors":"Theresa Zechman","doi":"10.2190/PGL0-EB3J-NVKT-G48V","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will attempt to provide answers about the extent of an employee’s 4th Amendment rights. The first section will provide an overview of the requirements of the 4th Amendment. The following sections will explore specific issues including urinalysis, the privacy of an employee’s desk, video surveillance, and lockers. Joe, a truck driver for Trucking Inc., arrives at work to begin his shift. Following normal protocol, he places his jacket and other personal belongings in his locker in the employees’ locker room in the Trucking Inc. terminal. Joe talks with the other employees in the locker room who are changing their clothes as their shift has ended. Unbeknownst to Joe and his fellow employees, Trucking Inc. is watching. Placed in the smoke alarm above their lockers is a minuscule video camera which records the employees’ every move. Has Joe’s 4th Amendment right to be secure in his person and free from unreasonable search and seizures been violated? It depends. THE FUNDAMENTAL CASE LAW The 4th Amendment to the United State Constitution provides: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/PGL0-EB3J-NVKT-G48V","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article will attempt to provide answers about the extent of an employee’s 4th Amendment rights. The first section will provide an overview of the requirements of the 4th Amendment. The following sections will explore specific issues including urinalysis, the privacy of an employee’s desk, video surveillance, and lockers. Joe, a truck driver for Trucking Inc., arrives at work to begin his shift. Following normal protocol, he places his jacket and other personal belongings in his locker in the employees’ locker room in the Trucking Inc. terminal. Joe talks with the other employees in the locker room who are changing their clothes as their shift has ended. Unbeknownst to Joe and his fellow employees, Trucking Inc. is watching. Placed in the smoke alarm above their lockers is a minuscule video camera which records the employees’ every move. Has Joe’s 4th Amendment right to be secure in his person and free from unreasonable search and seizures been violated? It depends. THE FUNDAMENTAL CASE LAW The 4th Amendment to the United State Constitution provides: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雇主何时侵犯了雇员的第四修正案权利?判例法及适用
本文将试图提供关于雇员第四修正案权利范围的答案。第一部分将概述第四修正案的要求。以下部分将探讨具体问题,包括尿液分析、员工办公桌的隐私、视频监控和储物柜。乔是卡车运输公司的一名卡车司机,他开始上班。按照惯例,他把外套和其他私人物品放在卡车运输公司终端员工更衣室的储物柜里。在换班结束后,乔和更衣室里正在换衣服的其他员工交谈。乔和他的同事不知道的是,卡车运输公司正在监视他们。在他们的储物柜上方的烟雾报警器里有一个微型摄像机,可以记录下员工的一举一动。乔的人身安全和不受不合理搜查和扣押的第四修正案权利是否受到侵犯?视情况而定。基本判例法美国宪法第四修正案规定:人民的人身、房屋、文件和财产不受无理搜查和扣押的权利不得侵犯,除非有合理的理由,经宣誓或誓词支持,并特别说明要搜查的地点、要扣押的人或物,否则不得签发搜查令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Land Mines of the Family and Medical Leave Act Dress and Grooming Standards: How Legal are They? EQUAL PAY ACT CASES IN HIGHER EDUCATION Disparate Impact Discrimination and the ADEA: Coming of Age Disciplining Employees for Free Speech, Whistle Blowing, and Political Activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1