Implementasi Pembangunan Zona Integritas di Banten Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Nomor 29 Tahun 2019 tentang Pembangunan Zona Integritas Menuju WBK dan WBBM

Lisa Rachmawati, Nurikah Nurikah, Rila Kusumaningsih
{"title":"Implementasi Pembangunan Zona Integritas di Banten Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Nomor 29 Tahun 2019 tentang Pembangunan Zona Integritas Menuju WBK dan WBBM","authors":"Lisa Rachmawati, Nurikah Nurikah, Rila Kusumaningsih","doi":"10.51825/yta.v3i1.13152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The bureaucracy in this developing country has not positioned itself as a good servant to the community. Maladministration that often occurs in the realm of government makes the bureaucracy in Indonesia bad. The number of corrupt practices in public services encourages the government to be more active in bringing up various regulations in the wrong bureaucracy with the issuance of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 29 of 2019 concerning the development of integrity zones towards WBK and WBBM. The zone of integrity is a renewal of good governance for transparency and accountability in the government realm as an effort to prevent acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism. The method used in this research is the empirical juridical method. Specifications of descriptive analytical research. The data source uses primary data and is supported by secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques in this study by means of interviews. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively with a qualitative data analysis approach. The theory used in this study is the theory of good governance and the theory of law enforcement. The results of the research regarding the implementation of the development of the integrity zone towards WBK/WBBM in the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Banten Regional Office in six areas of change have been implemented. The supporting factors include the commitment of the leadership and staff that looks very strong, and the inhibiting factors include weak supervision, lack of IT human resources in making public service innovations. In conclusion, with the implementation of the construction of the integrity zone as an improvement in the quality of public services as a form of obtaining the WBK and WBBM predicates.","PeriodicalId":412679,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51825/yta.v3i1.13152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The bureaucracy in this developing country has not positioned itself as a good servant to the community. Maladministration that often occurs in the realm of government makes the bureaucracy in Indonesia bad. The number of corrupt practices in public services encourages the government to be more active in bringing up various regulations in the wrong bureaucracy with the issuance of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 29 of 2019 concerning the development of integrity zones towards WBK and WBBM. The zone of integrity is a renewal of good governance for transparency and accountability in the government realm as an effort to prevent acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism. The method used in this research is the empirical juridical method. Specifications of descriptive analytical research. The data source uses primary data and is supported by secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques in this study by means of interviews. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively with a qualitative data analysis approach. The theory used in this study is the theory of good governance and the theory of law enforcement. The results of the research regarding the implementation of the development of the integrity zone towards WBK/WBBM in the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Banten Regional Office in six areas of change have been implemented. The supporting factors include the commitment of the leadership and staff that looks very strong, and the inhibiting factors include weak supervision, lack of IT human resources in making public service innovations. In conclusion, with the implementation of the construction of the integrity zone as an improvement in the quality of public services as a form of obtaining the WBK and WBBM predicates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据《前任司法部长法》和《2019年人权》第29条,在班腾实现了诚信区域建设
这个发展中国家的官僚机构没有把自己定位为社区的好仆人。经常发生在政府领域的行政管理不善使印尼的官僚机构变得糟糕。公共服务部门腐败行为的数量促使政府更积极地在错误的官僚机构中制定各种法规,并颁布了2019年法律和人权部长条例第29号,该条例涉及向WBK和WBBM发展廉洁区。廉正区是在政府领域恢复良好治理,提高透明度和问责制,以防止腐败、勾结和裙带关系行为。本研究采用的方法是实证法学方法。描述性分析研究的规范。数据源使用一手数据,并由一手、二手和三手法律材料组成的二手数据提供支持。本研究的数据收集方法为访谈。获得的数据用定性数据分析方法进行描述性分析。本研究使用的理论是善治理论和执法理论。关于在万丹区域办事处法律和人权部在六个变革领域实施向WBK/WBBM方向发展的廉正区的研究结果已经得到执行。支持因素包括领导和员工的承诺看起来非常强,抑制因素包括监督薄弱,缺乏IT人力资源进行公共服务创新。综上所述,以诚信区建设的实施作为提高公共服务质量的一种形式,获得了WBK和WBBM的谓词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Penista Agama Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pandeglang Nomor : 28/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Pdl Pelaksanaan Perlindungan terhadap Perempuan Korban Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (Studi di DP3AK dan UPT PPA Provinsi Jawa Timur) Urgensi Kriminalisasi Pengguna Jasa Prostitusi di Indonesia Penegakkan Hukum dan Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana terhadap Kasus Penganiayaan yang Dilakukan Anak di Bawah Umur Power of Judges in Deciding Legal Liability of Criminals with Mental Disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1