A Systematic Review of Dietary Assessment Tools for Children Age 11 Years and Younger

O. Olukotun, Nuananong Seal
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Dietary Assessment Tools for Children Age 11 Years and Younger","authors":"O. Olukotun, Nuananong Seal","doi":"10.1177/1941406415584819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dietary assessment tools are useful in nutritional epidemiology for identifying dietary patterns in both children and adults. Most commonly, dietary assessment methods include 24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaires (FFQs), and food records. Despite the general acceptability of these methods, their accuracy and appropriateness for children have largely been underexamined. The purpose of this review was to identify the most appropriate dietary assessment methods for children age 11 years and younger by evaluating the existing evidence in relation to the validity and reliability of dietary assessment tools used in this population. This review consists of a systematic search of 3 electronic databases. In total, 9 studies with a sum of 735 participants were included in the review: 3 studies assessed the validity of 24-hour recalls; 5 assessed the validity of FFQs; and 1 assessed the validity of food record. The findings suggest that a FFQ may be the best method for assessing dietary intake in children ...","PeriodicalId":398639,"journal":{"name":"ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1941406415584819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Dietary assessment tools are useful in nutritional epidemiology for identifying dietary patterns in both children and adults. Most commonly, dietary assessment methods include 24-hour recalls, food frequency questionnaires (FFQs), and food records. Despite the general acceptability of these methods, their accuracy and appropriateness for children have largely been underexamined. The purpose of this review was to identify the most appropriate dietary assessment methods for children age 11 years and younger by evaluating the existing evidence in relation to the validity and reliability of dietary assessment tools used in this population. This review consists of a systematic search of 3 electronic databases. In total, 9 studies with a sum of 735 participants were included in the review: 3 studies assessed the validity of 24-hour recalls; 5 assessed the validity of FFQs; and 1 assessed the validity of food record. The findings suggest that a FFQ may be the best method for assessing dietary intake in children ...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
11岁及以下儿童膳食评估工具系统综述
饮食评估工具在营养流行病学中对确定儿童和成人的饮食模式很有用。最常见的饮食评估方法包括24小时召回、食物频率问卷调查(FFQs)和食物记录。尽管这些方法被普遍接受,但它们对儿童的准确性和适当性在很大程度上没有得到充分的审查。本综述的目的是通过评估该人群中使用的与膳食评估工具的有效性和可靠性相关的现有证据,确定最适合11岁及以下儿童的膳食评估方法。本综述包括对3个电子数据库的系统检索。本综述共纳入9项研究,共735名受试者:3项研究评估24小时回忆的效度;5评估ffq的效度;对食品记录的有效性进行了评估。研究结果表明,FFQ可能是评估儿童膳食摄入量的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scurvy Related to the Use of a Homemade Tube Feeding Formula Vitamin D Prevalence of Deficiency on an Inpatient Pediatric Psychiatry Service Improving Clinical Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants by Early Standardized Nutritional Management Use of Expressed Breast Milk With the Ketogenic Diet Tackling Pediatric Obesity All Hands on Deck
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1