Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience and 3 years follow-up with 68 cases

K. Davidoff, E. Popov, A. Popov, D. Zlatanov, N. Stoyanov, A. Alexandrov, V. Ivanov, K. Ibrahimov
{"title":"Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience and 3 years follow-up with 68 cases","authors":"K. Davidoff, E. Popov, A. Popov, D. Zlatanov, N. Stoyanov, A. Alexandrov, V. Ivanov, K. Ibrahimov","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V30I2.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Partial nephrectomy is considered the gold standard procedure in managing small renal masses less than 4cm, even less than 7 cm in the last decade. Minimal invasive surgery is a preferred option in those cases. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has equivalent oncological results with open partial nephrectomy, offering in the same time all the advantages of minimal invasive surgery. The purpose of our study is to present our initial experience in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Material and Methods : Between May 2015 and December 2017, 68 selected patients with renal masses smaller than 7cm observed by CT scan, were submitted to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Patient demographics, preoperative tumor characteristics and detailed operative, postoperative and pathologic data were collected. Results : Mean age of patients is 56,1 years (44-71), mean diameter of renal tumor 5, 3 cm (3,3 - 7,4 cm).36 patients had a right partial nephrectomy and 32 a left one, with no intraoperative complications. In four patients a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was done, there are no cases of conversion to open surgery. The operation time ranged from 90 to 211 min, estimated blood loss (EBL) ranged from 30 to 300 ml and warm ischemia time (WIT) ranged from 5 to 31 min. Overall, four cases of postoperative complications CDC ≥ 3 were observed. One patient presented with a ureteric stricture and 3 with bleeding which necessitate angiographic intervention. There was one patient with a microscopic positive surgical margin and all patients are disease free during follow up (3-20 months, mean 12,2 months). Mean serum creatinine level has increased 23 mcmol/L (0-114). Conclusion : Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible approach in small renal masses, offering all the advantages of minimal invasive surgery","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"48 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V30I2.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction : Partial nephrectomy is considered the gold standard procedure in managing small renal masses less than 4cm, even less than 7 cm in the last decade. Minimal invasive surgery is a preferred option in those cases. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has equivalent oncological results with open partial nephrectomy, offering in the same time all the advantages of minimal invasive surgery. The purpose of our study is to present our initial experience in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Material and Methods : Between May 2015 and December 2017, 68 selected patients with renal masses smaller than 7cm observed by CT scan, were submitted to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Patient demographics, preoperative tumor characteristics and detailed operative, postoperative and pathologic data were collected. Results : Mean age of patients is 56,1 years (44-71), mean diameter of renal tumor 5, 3 cm (3,3 - 7,4 cm).36 patients had a right partial nephrectomy and 32 a left one, with no intraoperative complications. In four patients a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was done, there are no cases of conversion to open surgery. The operation time ranged from 90 to 211 min, estimated blood loss (EBL) ranged from 30 to 300 ml and warm ischemia time (WIT) ranged from 5 to 31 min. Overall, four cases of postoperative complications CDC ≥ 3 were observed. One patient presented with a ureteric stricture and 3 with bleeding which necessitate angiographic intervention. There was one patient with a microscopic positive surgical margin and all patients are disease free during follow up (3-20 months, mean 12,2 months). Mean serum creatinine level has increased 23 mcmol/L (0-114). Conclusion : Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible approach in small renal masses, offering all the advantages of minimal invasive surgery
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜肾切除术68例的初步经验及3年随访
导读:在过去的十年中,部分肾切除术被认为是治疗小于4cm,甚至小于7cm的小肾肿块的金标准手术。在这些情况下,微创手术是首选的选择。腹腔镜部分肾切除术与开放式部分肾切除术具有相同的肿瘤效果,同时具有微创手术的所有优点。本研究的目的是介绍腹腔镜肾部分切除术的初步经验。材料与方法:2015年5月至2017年12月,选择68例CT扫描发现肾肿块小于7cm的患者行腹腔镜肾部分切除术。收集患者人口统计学、术前肿瘤特征以及详细的手术、术后和病理资料。结果:患者平均年龄56.1岁(44 ~ 71岁),肾肿瘤平均直径5.3 cm (3,3 ~ 7,4 cm)。右肾部分切除术36例,左肾部分切除术32例,无术中并发症。4例患者行腹腔镜根治性肾切除术,没有一例转为开放手术。手术时间90 ~ 211 min,估计失血量(EBL) 30 ~ 300 ml,热缺血时间(WIT) 5 ~ 31 min。术后并发症CDC≥3例4例。1例患者表现为输尿管狭窄,3例出血,需要血管造影介入。1例手术切缘镜检阳性,随访3 ~ 20个月,平均12、2个月,均无病变。平均血清肌酐水平升高23 mcmol/L(0 ~ 114)。结论:腹腔镜肾部分切除术具有微创手术的优点,是一种安全可行的小肾肿物切除方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pelvic sensation in the elderly What a urologist should know about pelvic neurophysiology testing The role of invasive urodynamics in female stress urinary incontinence Anandamide and the urinary bladder How can we explain the poor medication adherence in patients with overactive bladder syndrome?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1