Comparing the transformative potentials of the FCCC and the CCD: An ecofeminist exploration

Kate Wilkinson Cross
{"title":"Comparing the transformative potentials of the FCCC and the CCD: An ecofeminist exploration","authors":"Kate Wilkinson Cross","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i1.1583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article undertakes a critical comparison and analysis of two environmental regimes – the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification, Particularly in Africa – to explore their transformative potential. Drawing on Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics, the author compares and contrasts the ways in which these two regimes engage with the underlying institutional, structural, social and conceptual frameworks which ecofeminists argue contribute to the environmental degradation and the exploitation suffered by marginalised groups. She examines how marginalised communities have been involved in the evolution of the two regimes, the differing approaches towards science and technology, as well as the integration of differentiation within the two regimes. The author concludes that while both regimes have transformative potential, they both continue to affirm an ideological perspective that disembeds humanity from the environment, while at the same time commodifying nature in order to protect it.","PeriodicalId":382436,"journal":{"name":"The Denning Law Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Denning Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/dlj.v30i1.1583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article undertakes a critical comparison and analysis of two environmental regimes – the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification, Particularly in Africa – to explore their transformative potential. Drawing on Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics, the author compares and contrasts the ways in which these two regimes engage with the underlying institutional, structural, social and conceptual frameworks which ecofeminists argue contribute to the environmental degradation and the exploitation suffered by marginalised groups. She examines how marginalised communities have been involved in the evolution of the two regimes, the differing approaches towards science and technology, as well as the integration of differentiation within the two regimes. The author concludes that while both regimes have transformative potential, they both continue to affirm an ideological perspective that disembeds humanity from the environment, while at the same time commodifying nature in order to protect it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较FCCC和CCD的变革潜力:一个生态女性主义的探索
本文对两个环境机制——《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《联合国防治荒漠化公约,特别是在非洲防治荒漠化公约》——进行了批判性的比较和分析,以探索它们的变革潜力。引用卡伦·沃伦的生态女性主义伦理学,作者比较和对比了这两种政权与潜在的制度、结构、社会和概念框架的关系,生态女性主义者认为这些框架导致了环境退化和边缘化群体遭受的剥削。她研究了被边缘化的社区如何参与两种制度的演变,对待科学和技术的不同方法,以及两种制度内部差异的整合。作者的结论是,虽然这两个政权都有变革的潜力,但它们都继续肯定一种意识形态观点,即将人类从环境中剥离出来,同时将自然商品化以保护它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Are the Legal Mechanisms for Seeking Solutions to Disparities in the Delivery of Care in the NHS and Where Does Liability Lie? Beneficial Ownership of the Family Home Apologies and the Legacy of an Unlawful Application of Terra Nullius in Terra Australis Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Contemporary Asian Reading of a Seminal Text ‘Not My Employee, Not My Liability’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1