Testing Assumptions—Does Enhancing Subject Terms Increase Use of Digital Library Content?

Todd Digby, Chelsea Dinsmore
{"title":"Testing Assumptions—Does Enhancing Subject Terms Increase Use of Digital Library Content?","authors":"Todd Digby, Chelsea Dinsmore","doi":"10.29242/lac.2018.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern library systems, access to the digital content is heavily dependent on effective metadata. The University of Florida (UF) Digital Collections (UFDC) are an actively growing, open access, digital library comprising over 500,000 records. As with any large-scale digital library project, a well-known challenge is the varying quality and quantity of legacy metadata available for each title. Inconsistent metadata makes digitized materials harder to find. If users cannot find the content they are looking for, a great deal of human effort has been wasted and the investment in digital collections is not being realized. Subject terms can be one of the most efficient methods for accessing desired materials, and subject terms created from controlled vocabularies deliver the most consistent results. To date, applying and editing subject metadata has been a record-by-record, labor-intensive process, making the prospect of retrospective projects cost-prohibitive. The UF team is investigating the capacity of research library staff to implement a Machine Assisted Indexing (MAI) system to automate the process of selecting and applying subject terms, based on the use of a rule set combined with controlled vocabularies, to the metadata of a body of already digitized content. To execute the project, the Smathers Libraries team at UF is collaborating with Access Innovations (AI) consultants to implement a machine-assisted indexing system to mitigate the challenges discussed above.","PeriodicalId":193553,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","volume":"256 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29242/lac.2018.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In modern library systems, access to the digital content is heavily dependent on effective metadata. The University of Florida (UF) Digital Collections (UFDC) are an actively growing, open access, digital library comprising over 500,000 records. As with any large-scale digital library project, a well-known challenge is the varying quality and quantity of legacy metadata available for each title. Inconsistent metadata makes digitized materials harder to find. If users cannot find the content they are looking for, a great deal of human effort has been wasted and the investment in digital collections is not being realized. Subject terms can be one of the most efficient methods for accessing desired materials, and subject terms created from controlled vocabularies deliver the most consistent results. To date, applying and editing subject metadata has been a record-by-record, labor-intensive process, making the prospect of retrospective projects cost-prohibitive. The UF team is investigating the capacity of research library staff to implement a Machine Assisted Indexing (MAI) system to automate the process of selecting and applying subject terms, based on the use of a rule set combined with controlled vocabularies, to the metadata of a body of already digitized content. To execute the project, the Smathers Libraries team at UF is collaborating with Access Innovations (AI) consultants to implement a machine-assisted indexing system to mitigate the challenges discussed above.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检验假设——增强主题词是否会增加数字图书馆内容的使用?
在现代图书馆系统中,对数字内容的访问严重依赖于有效的元数据。佛罗里达大学(UF)数字馆藏(UFDC)是一个积极发展的开放获取数字图书馆,拥有超过500,000条记录。与任何大型数字图书馆项目一样,一个众所周知的挑战是每个标题可用的遗留元数据的质量和数量各不相同。不一致的元数据使数字化材料更难找到。如果用户找不到他们想要的内容,那么大量的人力劳动就被浪费了,对数字馆藏的投资也就没有实现。主题词可能是访问所需材料的最有效方法之一,从受控词汇表创建的主题词可以提供最一致的结果。迄今为止,应用和编辑主题元数据一直是一个逐个记录的劳动密集型过程,这使得回顾性项目的前景成本高昂。佛罗里达大学的研究小组正在调查研究图书馆工作人员实施机器辅助索引(MAI)系统的能力,该系统基于使用与受控词汇相结合的规则集,将选择和应用主题术语的过程自动化到已经数字化内容的元数据中。为了执行该项目,佛罗里达大学的smart图书馆团队与Access Innovations (AI)顾问合作,实现了一个机器辅助索引系统,以缓解上述挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Library Design: How Many Seats Do We Need? Engaging Graduate Students in Research and Scholarly Life Cycle Practices: Localized Modeling of Scholarly Communication for Alignment with Strategic Initiatives Reflections on Creating a Multi-Site, Mixed Methods, and Interpretive Assessment Project Choose Your Adventure: A Library Reorganization Case Study Collecting Globally, Connecting Locally: 21st Century Libraries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1