The Usage Characteristics of Twitter in the Learning Process.

Anat Cohen, Galit Duchan
{"title":"The Usage Characteristics of Twitter in the Learning Process.","authors":"Anat Cohen, Galit Duchan","doi":"10.28945/1733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) available today enable educators, more than ever, to extend learning processes through a variety of tools, called Web 2.0 tools. These tools allow the use of the internet not only as a repository for information but as a means for creating, sharing and consuming information and knowledge. Many studies indicate the potential educational advancement which is inherent in a combination of tools such as Wiki, Blog, and Podcast for creation of collaborative knowledge in the teaching and learning processes (Clark, Logan, Mee, & Oliver, 2009; Zang, 2009). Prensky (2008) emphasized that the challenge is not only diversification and enrichment of teaching by visual and demonstrative means that increase motivation among the students, but a combination of tools that allow students to actively participate in the use of means for learning management and mentoring in order to facilitate the teacher in producing products and sharing them with the learning community. Twitter is one of the Web 2.0 tools, which allows for the sharing of messages. Twitter users are able to post direct and indirect updates. Direct posts (personal messages) are used when a user aims her update to a specific person, whereas indirect updates (public messages) are used when the update is meant for anyone that cares to read it. Even though direct updates are used to communicate directly with a specific person, they are public and anyone can see them. Often times two or more users will have conversations by posting updates directed to each other (Huberman, Romero, & Wu, 2008). The Twitter community is divided into Followers--the participants who choose to follow someone or a group- and Following--the user that you choose to follow and read his or her messages. The uniqueness of Twitter--the micro blogging and social networking platform most amenable to ongoing, public dialogue--is expressed in the combination of four characteristics: the length of message is limited to 140 characters and is called a tweet; the message is public, because reading it is not conditional upon author approval; the distribution of the message depends on the interest aroused among a group of followers; and the message transmission can be synchronous or asynchronous through mobile devices or stationary computers (O'Reilly & Milstein, 2009). This study deals with the potential of Twitter as a teaching-supporting tool in face to face (F2F) learning. During the research, short text messaging, including media files, was tested and determined to assist not only the personal-business, but also to create a leap in pedagogical-management learning. The study examines how and to what extent the teacher and the students utilize the proposed technology to answer educational questions and for information sharing (pedagogical use); as support and encouragement for group members (the followers); and for the transfer of memorandums and messages (management use). In addition, this study examines the technical difficulties in implementing this new technology in a learning environment. The uniqueness and importance of this research is in the age group on which it focuses, an age group that has not yet been examined (aged 14-15--ninth grade, N=20); furthermore, data was analyzed by decoding tweets, grouping tweets into various pedagogical and social uses, and exploring the technical difficulties that arise as a result of using Twitter. In addition, several communication characteristics that have not yet been analyzed regarding Twitter as an educational tool are included in the research. Background Web 2.0 is both a platform on which innovative technologies have been built and a space where users are as important as the content they upload and share with others. Web 2.0 includes social networks, such as MySpace and Facebook; media sharing, such as YouTube and Flickr; social bookmarking, such as Delicious; collaborative knowledge development through wikis (e. …","PeriodicalId":104467,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/1733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Introduction Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) available today enable educators, more than ever, to extend learning processes through a variety of tools, called Web 2.0 tools. These tools allow the use of the internet not only as a repository for information but as a means for creating, sharing and consuming information and knowledge. Many studies indicate the potential educational advancement which is inherent in a combination of tools such as Wiki, Blog, and Podcast for creation of collaborative knowledge in the teaching and learning processes (Clark, Logan, Mee, & Oliver, 2009; Zang, 2009). Prensky (2008) emphasized that the challenge is not only diversification and enrichment of teaching by visual and demonstrative means that increase motivation among the students, but a combination of tools that allow students to actively participate in the use of means for learning management and mentoring in order to facilitate the teacher in producing products and sharing them with the learning community. Twitter is one of the Web 2.0 tools, which allows for the sharing of messages. Twitter users are able to post direct and indirect updates. Direct posts (personal messages) are used when a user aims her update to a specific person, whereas indirect updates (public messages) are used when the update is meant for anyone that cares to read it. Even though direct updates are used to communicate directly with a specific person, they are public and anyone can see them. Often times two or more users will have conversations by posting updates directed to each other (Huberman, Romero, & Wu, 2008). The Twitter community is divided into Followers--the participants who choose to follow someone or a group- and Following--the user that you choose to follow and read his or her messages. The uniqueness of Twitter--the micro blogging and social networking platform most amenable to ongoing, public dialogue--is expressed in the combination of four characteristics: the length of message is limited to 140 characters and is called a tweet; the message is public, because reading it is not conditional upon author approval; the distribution of the message depends on the interest aroused among a group of followers; and the message transmission can be synchronous or asynchronous through mobile devices or stationary computers (O'Reilly & Milstein, 2009). This study deals with the potential of Twitter as a teaching-supporting tool in face to face (F2F) learning. During the research, short text messaging, including media files, was tested and determined to assist not only the personal-business, but also to create a leap in pedagogical-management learning. The study examines how and to what extent the teacher and the students utilize the proposed technology to answer educational questions and for information sharing (pedagogical use); as support and encouragement for group members (the followers); and for the transfer of memorandums and messages (management use). In addition, this study examines the technical difficulties in implementing this new technology in a learning environment. The uniqueness and importance of this research is in the age group on which it focuses, an age group that has not yet been examined (aged 14-15--ninth grade, N=20); furthermore, data was analyzed by decoding tweets, grouping tweets into various pedagogical and social uses, and exploring the technical difficulties that arise as a result of using Twitter. In addition, several communication characteristics that have not yet been analyzed regarding Twitter as an educational tool are included in the research. Background Web 2.0 is both a platform on which innovative technologies have been built and a space where users are as important as the content they upload and share with others. Web 2.0 includes social networks, such as MySpace and Facebook; media sharing, such as YouTube and Flickr; social bookmarking, such as Delicious; collaborative knowledge development through wikis (e. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习过程中Twitter的使用特点。
当今可用的信息和通信技术(ICT)使教育工作者比以往任何时候都能通过各种工具(称为Web 2.0工具)扩展学习过程。这些工具使得互联网不仅可以作为信息存储库,而且可以作为创建、共享和消费信息和知识的手段。许多研究表明,在教学过程中使用Wiki、博客和播客等工具来创造协作知识是潜在的教育进步(Clark, Logan, Mee, & Oliver, 2009;藏,2009)。Prensky(2008)强调,面临的挑战不仅是通过视觉和示范的手段使教学多样化和丰富,从而提高学生的积极性,而且是一种工具的组合,使学生积极参与使用学习管理和指导的手段,以促进教师生产产品并与学习社区分享。Twitter是Web 2.0工具之一,它允许共享消息。Twitter用户可以发布直接和间接的更新。当用户的更新目标是特定的人时,使用直接帖子(个人消息),而当更新是针对任何关心它的人时,使用间接更新(公共消息)。尽管直接更新是用来与特定的人直接交流的,但它们是公开的,任何人都可以看到它们。通常情况下,两个或两个以上的用户会通过直接向对方发布更新来进行对话(Huberman, Romero, & Wu, 2008)。Twitter社区分为追随者(follower)和追随者(Following),前者是选择关注某人或一个群组的参与者,后者是你选择关注并阅读他或她的消息的用户。Twitter是最适合进行持续公开对话的微博和社交网络平台,它的独特性体现在四个特征的结合:消息长度限制在140个字符以内,被称为tweet;这条信息是公开的,因为阅读它不需要作者的批准;信息的分布取决于在一群追随者中引起的兴趣;通过移动设备或固定计算机的信息传输可以是同步或异步的(O'Reilly & Milstein, 2009)。本研究探讨了Twitter作为面对面(F2F)学习的教学支持工具的潜力。在研究过程中,包括媒体文件在内的短文本信息被测试并确定不仅有助于个人业务,而且还有助于教学管理学习的飞跃。该研究考察了教师和学生如何以及在多大程度上利用所提出的技术来回答教育问题和信息共享(教学使用);作为团体成员(追随者)的支持和鼓励;并用于备忘录和信息的传送(管理使用)。此外,本研究探讨了在学习环境中实施这项新技术的技术困难。这项研究的独特性和重要性在于它所关注的年龄组,一个尚未被研究过的年龄组(14-15岁-九年级,N=20);此外,通过解码推文来分析数据,将推文分组为各种教学和社会用途,并探索由于使用推特而产生的技术困难。此外,研究中还包括了一些尚未被分析的关于Twitter作为教育工具的传播特征。Web 2.0既是一个建立创新技术的平台,也是一个用户与他们上传和与他人分享的内容一样重要的空间。web2.0包括社交网络,如MySpace和Facebook;媒体共享,如YouTube和Flickr;社交书签,比如Delicious;通过wiki (e. ...)进行协作知识开发
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a Conceptual Framework for Evaluation of E-Content of Virtual Courses: E-Learning Center of an Iranian University Case Study. Beyond Adoption: Barriers to an Online Assignment Submission System Continued Use Student Perceptions of Various E-Learning Components Open the Windows of Communication: Promoting Interpersonal and Group Interactions Using Blogs in Higher Education An Agent-based Federated Learning Object Search Service
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1