Scale and Skill in Mutual Fund Management: Evidence from Norway

Markus Snøve Høiberg
{"title":"Scale and Skill in Mutual Fund Management: Evidence from Norway","authors":"Markus Snøve Høiberg","doi":"10.33215/SJOM.V3I4.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a sample free of survivorship bias and several risk-adjusted performance benchmarks to identify effects of scale on mutual fund performance in the Norwegian market, I find mixed evidence that both large and small funds underperform as against the middle-sized funds in the period 2005-2018. Controlling for relevant factors in panel data regressions, I find that, on average, performance worsens with an increase in size while giving support to initial findings of nonlinearity. The relationship is most robust after 2013 and seems to be affected by competition in the market as well as fund inflows. I do not find any empirical evidence to support the liquidity hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":215982,"journal":{"name":"SEISENSE Journal of Management","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEISENSE Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33215/SJOM.V3I4.351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a sample free of survivorship bias and several risk-adjusted performance benchmarks to identify effects of scale on mutual fund performance in the Norwegian market, I find mixed evidence that both large and small funds underperform as against the middle-sized funds in the period 2005-2018. Controlling for relevant factors in panel data regressions, I find that, on average, performance worsens with an increase in size while giving support to initial findings of nonlinearity. The relationship is most robust after 2013 and seems to be affected by competition in the market as well as fund inflows. I do not find any empirical evidence to support the liquidity hypothesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同基金管理的规模与技能:来自挪威的证据
使用无生存偏差的样本和几个风险调整后的绩效基准来确定规模对挪威市场共同基金业绩的影响,我发现混合证据表明,2005年至2018年期间,大型和小型基金的表现都不如中型基金。控制面板数据回归中的相关因素,我发现,平均而言,性能随着规模的增加而恶化,同时支持非线性的初步发现。这种关系在2013年之后最为强劲,似乎受到市场竞争和资金流入的影响。我没有找到任何实证证据来支持流动性假说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the VUCA Terrain: Unveiling HR Strategies for Modern Organizational Agility Navigating the VUCA Terrain: Unveiling HR Strategies for Modern Organizational Agility Socially Responsible Leadership and Job Engagement in University Context: Mediation of Psychological Safety Socially Responsible Leadership and Job Engagement in University Context: Mediation of Psychological Safety Employee Performance Model: Analysis of Training, Organizational Culture and Work Environment by Mediating Work Discipline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1