Victimization of patients with schizophrenia and related disorders.

P. Fitzgerald, A. D. de Castella, K. Filia, S. Filia, J. Benitez, J. Kulkarni
{"title":"Victimization of patients with schizophrenia and related disorders.","authors":"P. Fitzgerald, A. D. de Castella, K. Filia, S. Filia, J. Benitez, J. Kulkarni","doi":"10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01539.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPrevious research has predominately focused on patients with mental illness as the instigators, rather than the victims, of violence and criminal activity. However, patients with schizophrenia appear to experience a higher degree of victimization compared to general community samples. We aimed to establish the 1-month prevalence of violent and non-violent victimization in a sample of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and to investigate the determinants of victimization.\n\n\nMETHOD\nReports of violent and non-violent victimization were recorded in 348 patients in Dandenong, an outer metropolitan suburb of Melbourne, Australia along with the subjective perception of patients as to their degree of protection from being robbed or attacked. Patients reporting victimization were compared with those who did not, across a range of clinical and psychosocial variables.\n\n\nRESULTS\n11.2% of the sample reported being the victim of non-violent crime and 4.3% the victim of violent crime in the 1-month period. 23.2% reported dissatisfaction with their protection against being attacked or robbed. The major determinant of victimization was the lack of any meaningful daily activity.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders are at increased risk of victimization, both of the violent and non-violent type. Further research is required to understand the pathways through which victimization occurs and to understand whether psychosocial interventions can reduce victimization in this patient population.","PeriodicalId":117457,"journal":{"name":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01539.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

BACKGROUND Previous research has predominately focused on patients with mental illness as the instigators, rather than the victims, of violence and criminal activity. However, patients with schizophrenia appear to experience a higher degree of victimization compared to general community samples. We aimed to establish the 1-month prevalence of violent and non-violent victimization in a sample of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and to investigate the determinants of victimization. METHOD Reports of violent and non-violent victimization were recorded in 348 patients in Dandenong, an outer metropolitan suburb of Melbourne, Australia along with the subjective perception of patients as to their degree of protection from being robbed or attacked. Patients reporting victimization were compared with those who did not, across a range of clinical and psychosocial variables. RESULTS 11.2% of the sample reported being the victim of non-violent crime and 4.3% the victim of violent crime in the 1-month period. 23.2% reported dissatisfaction with their protection against being attacked or robbed. The major determinant of victimization was the lack of any meaningful daily activity. CONCLUSIONS Patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders are at increased risk of victimization, both of the violent and non-violent type. Further research is required to understand the pathways through which victimization occurs and to understand whether psychosocial interventions can reduce victimization in this patient population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症及相关疾病患者受害。
以前的研究主要集中在精神疾病患者作为暴力和犯罪活动的煽动者,而不是受害者。然而,与一般社区样本相比,精神分裂症患者似乎经历了更高程度的受害。我们的目的是在精神分裂症谱系障碍患者样本中建立1个月暴力和非暴力伤害的流行情况,并调查伤害的决定因素。方法对澳大利亚墨尔本远郊丹德农348例患者的暴力和非暴力受害报告,以及患者对自己免受抢劫或袭击程度的主观感知进行记录。通过一系列临床和社会心理变量,将报告受害的患者与未报告受害的患者进行比较。结果在1个月内,11.2%的样本报告为非暴力犯罪的受害者,4.3%的样本报告为暴力犯罪的受害者。23.2%的受访者表示不满意他们免受袭击或抢劫的保护。受害的主要决定因素是缺乏任何有意义的日常活动。结论精神分裂症谱系障碍患者遭受暴力和非暴力伤害的风险均增加。需要进一步的研究来了解受害发生的途径,并了解社会心理干预是否可以减少这一患者群体的受害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Suicide and suicidality in Australian Defence Force veterans: A systematic scoping review. The benefits and harms of community treatment orders for people diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses: A rapid umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Childhood trauma is prevalent and associated with co-occurring depression, anxiety, mania and psychosis in young people attending Australian youth mental health services Plasma neurofilament light in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia compared to mood and psychotic disorders Systematic review of Indigenous involvement and content in mental health interventions and their effectiveness for Indigenous populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1