The thrombogenicity of radiation grafted polymers as measured by the vena cava ring test.

Journal of bioengineering Pub Date : 1978-06-01
B D Ratner, A S Hoffman, J D Whiffen
{"title":"The thrombogenicity of radiation grafted polymers as measured by the vena cava ring test.","authors":"B D Ratner,&nbsp;A S Hoffman,&nbsp;J D Whiffen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiation grafted hydrogels on silicone rubber with water contents ranging from 10--90% have been evaluated by the vena cava ring test. All hydrogel grafted materials were found to accumulate less thrombus than ungrafted silicone rubber, and graft level was found to have little effect on thrombus accumulation. Acrylamide grafts demonstrated superior thromboresistance by this test. Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-ethyl methacrylate (HEMA/EMA) copolymers were examined along with pure HEMA and EMA grafts. At two weeks implantation, intermediate HEMA/EMA copolymers were found to have the least thrombus accumulation of any of the polymers in this series. EMA grafted rings were highly thrombogenic. The results from these studies indicate that the sensitivity of the vena cava ring test for detecting certain differences in polymer structure is poor. Also, the significance of the vena cava ring test for evaluating materials for use in contact with flowing human blood is questionable, based upon comparisons of results for similar materials tested in other blood compatibility evaluation systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":75990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of bioengineering","volume":"2 3-4","pages":"313-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiation grafted hydrogels on silicone rubber with water contents ranging from 10--90% have been evaluated by the vena cava ring test. All hydrogel grafted materials were found to accumulate less thrombus than ungrafted silicone rubber, and graft level was found to have little effect on thrombus accumulation. Acrylamide grafts demonstrated superior thromboresistance by this test. Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-ethyl methacrylate (HEMA/EMA) copolymers were examined along with pure HEMA and EMA grafts. At two weeks implantation, intermediate HEMA/EMA copolymers were found to have the least thrombus accumulation of any of the polymers in this series. EMA grafted rings were highly thrombogenic. The results from these studies indicate that the sensitivity of the vena cava ring test for detecting certain differences in polymer structure is poor. Also, the significance of the vena cava ring test for evaluating materials for use in contact with flowing human blood is questionable, based upon comparisons of results for similar materials tested in other blood compatibility evaluation systems.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过腔静脉环试验测定放射接枝聚合物的血栓形成性。
用腔静脉环试验评价了含水量在10% -90%之间的硅橡胶辐射接枝水凝胶。所有水凝胶接枝材料的血栓积聚都比未接枝的硅橡胶少,并且接枝水平对血栓积聚的影响很小。丙烯酰胺移植物表现出优越的抗血栓性。研究了聚甲基丙烯酸2-羟乙基-甲基丙烯酸乙酯(HEMA/EMA)共聚物以及纯HEMA和EMA接枝。植入两周后,发现中间的HEMA/EMA共聚物在该系列聚合物中具有最少的血栓积聚。EMA移植环具有高血栓形成性。这些研究结果表明,腔静脉环试验检测聚合物结构某些差异的灵敏度较差。此外,基于在其他血液相容性评估系统中测试的类似材料的结果的比较,腔静脉环试验对评估与流动的人体血液接触的材料的意义是值得怀疑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stress-induced structure and activity changes in biologically active proteins. Transferred pulmonary surfactant film: chemical analysis and contact angle study. In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo acute responses to some amino acid copolymers and their esters. Tissue ingrowth in porous acrylic cement. The wear behavior of vacuum-vapor-deposited carbon films.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1