Logging the clinical learning experience: creating a dynamic teaching and learning environment through log-based supervision and student self-assessment

Kirsten Anne Tornøe Cand. Philol., RN
{"title":"Logging the clinical learning experience: creating a dynamic teaching and learning environment through log-based supervision and student self-assessment","authors":"Kirsten Anne Tornøe Cand. Philol., RN","doi":"10.1111/j.1473-6861.2007.00153.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study describes the implementation of a supervision and assessment system based on a clinical log writing strategy, involving second year student nurses in two surgical units.</p><p> The aim of the clinical log was to promote student nurses’ personal growth and to provide a database for competency assessment.</p><p> The log system was designed as a collaborative and dialogical strategy, committing all parties involved to document the teaching and learning process. Faculty and nurse supervisors monitored and verified the students’ progress by documenting supervision and formative assessment in the students’ logs, and students submitted evidence about their learning process and self-evaluation. Summative assessment was conducted through tripartite conferences at the end of the clinical placements. Together, faculty, clinical staff and student considered the evidence presented in the log in order to establish the student's level of clinical competency.</p><p> Using clinical logs to promote personal growth as well as to assess student performance in clinical placements is a controversial issue in the literature as critics argue that these aims are incompatible.</p><p> The log system was pilot tested with 14 students expanding into an action research project including 28 other students during the second year of the trial period. The log project was evaluated at end of the second year based on a semi-structured questionnaire designed by faculty and additional evaluative material such as journals, field notes and minutes from meetings with clinical staff. The general consensus among faculty and nursing staff was that the log-based supervision and assessment strategy had improved the quality of supervision and created a more dynamic teaching and learning environment, enhancing the students’ possibility to develop personally as well as professionally.</p>","PeriodicalId":100874,"journal":{"name":"Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2007.00153.x","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2007.00153.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study describes the implementation of a supervision and assessment system based on a clinical log writing strategy, involving second year student nurses in two surgical units.

 The aim of the clinical log was to promote student nurses’ personal growth and to provide a database for competency assessment.

 The log system was designed as a collaborative and dialogical strategy, committing all parties involved to document the teaching and learning process. Faculty and nurse supervisors monitored and verified the students’ progress by documenting supervision and formative assessment in the students’ logs, and students submitted evidence about their learning process and self-evaluation. Summative assessment was conducted through tripartite conferences at the end of the clinical placements. Together, faculty, clinical staff and student considered the evidence presented in the log in order to establish the student's level of clinical competency.

 Using clinical logs to promote personal growth as well as to assess student performance in clinical placements is a controversial issue in the literature as critics argue that these aims are incompatible.

 The log system was pilot tested with 14 students expanding into an action research project including 28 other students during the second year of the trial period. The log project was evaluated at end of the second year based on a semi-structured questionnaire designed by faculty and additional evaluative material such as journals, field notes and minutes from meetings with clinical staff. The general consensus among faculty and nursing staff was that the log-based supervision and assessment strategy had improved the quality of supervision and created a more dynamic teaching and learning environment, enhancing the students’ possibility to develop personally as well as professionally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记录临床学习经验:通过基于日志的监督和学生自我评估,创造动态的教学环境
本研究描述了基于临床日志撰写策略的监督和评估系统的实施,涉及两个外科单位的二年级学生护士。临床日志的目的是促进学生护士的个人成长,并为能力评估提供一个数据库。日志系统被设计为一种协作和对话策略,使所有相关方都能记录教学过程。教师和护士长通过在学生日志中记录监督和形成性评估来监督和验证学生的进步,学生提交关于他们的学习过程和自我评估的证据。在临床实习结束时,通过三方会议进行总结性评估。教师、临床工作人员和学生一起考虑日志中提供的证据,以确定学生的临床能力水平。使用临床日志来促进个人成长以及评估学生在临床实习中的表现在文献中是一个有争议的问题,因为批评者认为这些目标是不相容的。在试验的第二年,该日志系统在14名学生中进行了试点测试,并扩展为一个行动研究项目,其中包括另外28名学生。在第二年结束时,根据教师设计的半结构化问卷和其他评估材料(如期刊、实地记录和临床工作人员会议记录)对日志项目进行评估。教师和护理人员普遍认为,基于日志的监督和评估策略提高了监督质量,创造了更有活力的教学环境,提高了学生个人和专业发展的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiential placements and scaffolding for reflection A qualitative evaluation of an interprofessional learning project Becoming a lecturer in nurse education: the work-place learning of clinical experts as newcomers Lost in translation: barriers to learning in health professional clinical education Undergraduate socialization in medical education: ideals of professional physicians’ practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1