Against the theory of ‘Theory of Mind’

R. Hobson
{"title":"Against the theory of ‘Theory of Mind’","authors":"R. Hobson","doi":"10.1111/J.2044-835X.1991.TB00860.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to argue against the view that young children develop a ‘theory’ that people have minds, and to suggest reasons why children's concepts of the mind and of mental states are not adequately characterized as ‘theoretical’ in nature. I propose that what children acquire is knowledge of persons with minds, and that they do so through experience of interpersonal relations. I emphasize that infants' capacity for personal relatedness, the psychological bedrock for their understanding of persons, is partly constituted by innately determined perceptual-affective sensibilities towards the bodily appearances and behaviour of others. It is likely that children come to make inferences in the course of enriching and systematizing their concepts of mind, but this does not justify the view that ‘mental states’ are hypothetical constructs.","PeriodicalId":224518,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Development Psychology","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"214","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Development Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-835X.1991.TB00860.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 214

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to argue against the view that young children develop a ‘theory’ that people have minds, and to suggest reasons why children's concepts of the mind and of mental states are not adequately characterized as ‘theoretical’ in nature. I propose that what children acquire is knowledge of persons with minds, and that they do so through experience of interpersonal relations. I emphasize that infants' capacity for personal relatedness, the psychological bedrock for their understanding of persons, is partly constituted by innately determined perceptual-affective sensibilities towards the bodily appearances and behaviour of others. It is likely that children come to make inferences in the course of enriching and systematizing their concepts of mind, but this does not justify the view that ‘mental states’ are hypothetical constructs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反对"心智理论"
本文的目的是反对幼儿发展出一种“理论”的观点,即人们有思想,并提出为什么儿童的思想和精神状态的概念在本质上没有被充分描述为“理论”的原因。我认为,孩子们获得的是关于有思想的人的知识,他们是通过人际关系的经验来获得这些知识的。我强调,婴儿的人际关系能力是他们理解他人的心理基础,部分是由先天决定的对他人身体外表和行为的感知情感构成的。孩子们很可能是在丰富和系统化他们的心智概念的过程中进行推理的,但这并不能证明“心理状态”是假设构形的观点是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task: Use of task goals Is there an alternative to simulation and theory in understanding the mind Implicit and Explicit Motor Learning in Children with and without Down's Syndrome. Parents, parenting, and children's sleep problems: Exploring reciprocal effects Can Children Construct Inverse Relations in Arithmetic? Evidence for Individual Differences in the Development of Conceptual Understanding and Computational Skill.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1