Semantyka marmuru w teorii i praktyce polskiej rzeźby sakralnej w drugiej połowie XIX wieku

M. Nitka
{"title":"Semantyka marmuru w teorii i praktyce polskiej rzeźby sakralnej w drugiej połowie XIX wieku","authors":"M. Nitka","doi":"10.15584/setde.2020.13.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is an attempt to present the semantics of marble in the sacred Polish sculpture of Romanticism. Taking as its starting point the modern theory of art, it first emphasizes the special role of white marble in modern sculptural theory and practice, and then outlines the foundation of this judgment in the art of the classicist era, especially in the theory of J.J. Winckelmann. Together with the spread of classical tastes, the significance of this view for Polish modern sculpture is shown, in which, in accordance with Winckelmann’s taste, white marble was perceived as the noblest raw material, worthy of the images of the gods. In the Romantic era, following G. W. Hegel, marble was regarded as “spiritual” stone, the most suitable for the depiction of the sacred. This was expressed in the theory and practice of sculpture by such artists as Cyprian Norwid and Teofil Lenartowicz, who went to Rome – the capital of sacred art – to sculpt in this material. They were followed by other Polish sculptors who also went to Rome to work in marble. The article shows their struggles, which ended successfully only for T.O. Sosnowski. In his works, however, white marble from “animate” stone went on to become material suitable for making repetitive compositions in the spirit of Italian Purism. Marble evolved from being material suitable for the representation of gods to one used for commercial objects, which was perfectly illustrated by Norwid in his short story „Ad leones!”","PeriodicalId":385479,"journal":{"name":"Sacrum et Decorum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sacrum et Decorum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/setde.2020.13.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is an attempt to present the semantics of marble in the sacred Polish sculpture of Romanticism. Taking as its starting point the modern theory of art, it first emphasizes the special role of white marble in modern sculptural theory and practice, and then outlines the foundation of this judgment in the art of the classicist era, especially in the theory of J.J. Winckelmann. Together with the spread of classical tastes, the significance of this view for Polish modern sculpture is shown, in which, in accordance with Winckelmann’s taste, white marble was perceived as the noblest raw material, worthy of the images of the gods. In the Romantic era, following G. W. Hegel, marble was regarded as “spiritual” stone, the most suitable for the depiction of the sacred. This was expressed in the theory and practice of sculpture by such artists as Cyprian Norwid and Teofil Lenartowicz, who went to Rome – the capital of sacred art – to sculpt in this material. They were followed by other Polish sculptors who also went to Rome to work in marble. The article shows their struggles, which ended successfully only for T.O. Sosnowski. In his works, however, white marble from “animate” stone went on to become material suitable for making repetitive compositions in the spirit of Italian Purism. Marble evolved from being material suitable for the representation of gods to one used for commercial objects, which was perfectly illustrated by Norwid in his short story „Ad leones!”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文试图呈现波兰浪漫主义神圣雕塑中大理石的语义。以现代艺术理论为出发点,首先强调了白色大理石在现代雕塑理论和实践中的特殊作用,然后在古典主义时代的艺术中,特别是在J.J.温克尔曼的理论中概述了这一判断的基础。随着古典品味的传播,这种观点对波兰现代雕塑的意义就显现出来了,根据温克尔曼的品味,白色大理石被认为是最高贵的原材料,配得上神的形象。在浪漫主义时代,继黑格尔之后,大理石被视为“精神”石,最适合描绘神圣的事物。这表现在雕塑的理论和实践中,如塞浦路安·诺维德和特奥菲尔·莱纳托维奇,他们去了罗马——神圣艺术的首都——用这种材料进行雕刻。随后,其他波兰雕塑家也前往罗马从事大理石雕刻工作。这篇文章展示了他们的斗争,只有T.O.索斯诺基的斗争才以成功告终。然而,在他的作品中,来自“有生命的”石头的白色大理石继续成为适合制作意大利纯粹主义精神的重复作品的材料。大理石从适合代表神的材料演变为用于商业物品的材料,诺维德在他的短篇小说“Ad leones!”中完美地说明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Współczesne teorie piękna i decorum. Wybór poglądów XX wieku The mural paintings of Modest Sosenko. Characteristics of the style based on representative examples. In memory of Ryszard Ryba (1935–2022) Wprowadzenie Kolory Ofiary – akwarelowe malarstwo pasyjne Danyły Mowczana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1