A Statistical Approach to Ranking Similarities of Three Function Structure Groups Using Directed Graphs

Briana Lucero, M. J. Adams
{"title":"A Statistical Approach to Ranking Similarities of Three Function Structure Groups Using Directed Graphs","authors":"Briana Lucero, M. J. Adams","doi":"10.1115/DETC2018-86090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior efforts in the study of engineering design employed various approaches to decompose product design. Design engineers use functional representation, and more precisely function structures, to define a product’s functionality. However, significant barriers remain to objectively quantifying the similarity between two function structures, even for the same product when developed by multiple designers. For function-structure databases this means that function-structures are implicitly categorized leaving the possibility of incorrect categorization and reducing efficacy of returned analogous correlations. Improvements to efficacy in database organization and queries are possible by objectively quantifying the similarity between function structures.\n The proposed method exploits fundamental properties of function-structures and design taxonomies. We convert function-structures into directed graphs (digraphs) and equivalent adjacency matrices. The conversion maintains the directed (function → flow → function) progression inherent to function-structures and enables the transformation of the function-structure into a standardized graph. For design taxonomies (e.g. D-APPS), graph nodes represent flows in a consistent (but arbitrary) ordering. By exploiting the directional properties of function-structures and defining the flows as the graphical nodes, the objective and standardized comparison of two function-structures becomes feasible. We statistically quantify the association between digraphs using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC) for both within-group and between-group comparisons. The method was tested on three product types (ball thrower, food processor, and an ice cream maker) with function-structures defined by various designers. The method suggested herein is provided as a proof-of-concept with suggested verification and validation approaches for further development.","PeriodicalId":142043,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1A: 38th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference","volume":"22 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1A: 38th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior efforts in the study of engineering design employed various approaches to decompose product design. Design engineers use functional representation, and more precisely function structures, to define a product’s functionality. However, significant barriers remain to objectively quantifying the similarity between two function structures, even for the same product when developed by multiple designers. For function-structure databases this means that function-structures are implicitly categorized leaving the possibility of incorrect categorization and reducing efficacy of returned analogous correlations. Improvements to efficacy in database organization and queries are possible by objectively quantifying the similarity between function structures. The proposed method exploits fundamental properties of function-structures and design taxonomies. We convert function-structures into directed graphs (digraphs) and equivalent adjacency matrices. The conversion maintains the directed (function → flow → function) progression inherent to function-structures and enables the transformation of the function-structure into a standardized graph. For design taxonomies (e.g. D-APPS), graph nodes represent flows in a consistent (but arbitrary) ordering. By exploiting the directional properties of function-structures and defining the flows as the graphical nodes, the objective and standardized comparison of two function-structures becomes feasible. We statistically quantify the association between digraphs using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC) for both within-group and between-group comparisons. The method was tested on three product types (ball thrower, food processor, and an ice cream maker) with function-structures defined by various designers. The method suggested herein is provided as a proof-of-concept with suggested verification and validation approaches for further development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用有向图对三个函数结构群相似性排序的统计方法
在工程设计研究中,先前的努力采用了各种方法来分解产品设计。设计工程师使用功能表示,更准确地说是功能结构,来定义产品的功能。然而,客观地量化两个功能结构之间的相似性仍然存在重大障碍,即使是由多个设计师开发的同一产品。对于功能结构数据库,这意味着功能结构是隐式分类的,留下了不正确分类的可能性,并降低了返回的类似相关性的有效性。通过客观地量化功能结构之间的相似性,可以提高数据库组织和查询的效率。该方法利用了功能结构和设计分类法的基本特性。我们将函数结构转换为有向图(有向图)和等效邻接矩阵。转换保持了功能结构固有的有向(函数→流→函数)级数,并使功能结构转换为标准化图。对于设计分类法(例如D-APPS),图节点以一致(但任意)的顺序表示流。利用功能结构的方向性,将流定义为图形节点,使两种功能结构的客观、规范比较成为可能。我们使用皮尔逊积矩相关(PPMC)统计量化有向图之间的关联,用于组内和组间比较。该方法在三种产品类型(扔球机、食品加工机和冰淇淋机)上进行了测试,这些产品的功能结构由不同的设计师定义。本文提出的方法是作为概念验证提供的,并建议进一步开发验证和验证方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Simulation Model of a High Pressure Variable Displacement Vane Pump for Industrial Applications Multi-Resolution-Based Contour Corner Extraction Algorithm for Computer Vision-Based Measurement Open Uniaxial Test Machine (OpenUTM): Part 1 — A Low-Cost Electrohydraulic Test Frame for Additive Manufacturing Part Qualification ASME Conference Presenter Attendance Policy and Archival Proceedings Triangulation Based Isogeometric Analysis of the Cahn-Hilliard Phase-Field Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1