Trajectories of Mathematics and Technology Education Pointing to Engineering Design.

J. Daugherty, G. Reese, C. Merrill
{"title":"Trajectories of Mathematics and Technology Education Pointing to Engineering Design.","authors":"J. Daugherty, G. Reese, C. Merrill","doi":"10.21061/jots.v36i1.a.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A brief examination and comparison of mathematics and technology education provides the background for a discussion of integration. In particular, members of each field have responded to the increasing pressures to better prepare students for the technologically rich, globally competitive future. Approaches based within each discipline are varied across curriculum and instructional strategies. However, when examining the disciplines’ historical paths, there are important similarities to consider in determining how best to affect student learning in both mathematics and technology education. The authors contend that engineering design is the appropriate contextual area for integrating mathematics in technology education. Trajectories of Mathematics and Technology Education Pointing To Engineering Design The national learning standards associated with mathematics and technology education indicate a relationship between the disciplines of mathematics and technology education. Mathematics is referred to 30 times in the Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (International Technology Education Association (ITEA), 2000/2002) and technology is used over 20 times in the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics’ Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000). For example, standard three in the Standards for Technological Literacy states that “students will develop an understanding of the relationships among technologies and the connections between technology and other fields of study” (ITEA, 200/2002, p. 44). The Connections standard in the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics states that students will recognize and apply mathematics in contexts outside of mathematics, and the Problem Solving standard reads that students will solve problems that arise in mathematics and in other contexts. Both disciplines clearly include one another, at least in general terms. Their incorporation or relationship with each other appears to center on use. For example, upon review of these standards documents alone, the scope or purpose of technology in mathematics would appear to be that of instructional technology. Mathematics educators are primarily concerned with using technology to aid in instruction (e.g., computers, calculators, software) and facilitate student learning. Technology educators, on the other hand, are focused on how to use mathematics to understand, use, and design different technologies. Just as mathematics educators appear to see technology as a tool in service to solving mathematical problems, technology educators appear to see mathematics as a tool in service to solving technological problems (Merrill, Reese, & Daugherty, 2010). However, does a closer relationship exist between the two disciplines beside the onedimensional emphasis on use found in the standards? If a closer relationship were to exist, what might integrate the two disciplines? These two questions are the primary focus of this article. Moving beyond a simple analysis of standards documents, the historical trajectories of mathematics and technology education, as they relate to each other, are explored. By exploring these histories, a future point of integration through engineering design is explored. Mathematics Education and Technology Many reports have called for better preparation in mathematics and science, and for increased skills for the technology-rich workplace of the 21st century (American Association of University Women, 2000; Borgman et al., 2008; National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century, 2000; National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008). Yet, many parents and teachers consider mathematics as a very traditional process of technology-independent practice, focused on algorithms, facts, procedures, and so forth. The history of technology integration into mathematics is embedded in the developments and debates about mathematics education in more general terms. The “new mathematics movement” and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics’ (NCTM) standards-based reform are two T h e J o u rn a l o f Te c h n o lo g y S tu d ie s Trajectories of Mathematics and Technology Education Pointing To Engineering Design Jenny L. Daugherty, George C. Reese, and Chris Merrill 46","PeriodicalId":142452,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Technology Studies","volume":"10 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v36i1.a.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

A brief examination and comparison of mathematics and technology education provides the background for a discussion of integration. In particular, members of each field have responded to the increasing pressures to better prepare students for the technologically rich, globally competitive future. Approaches based within each discipline are varied across curriculum and instructional strategies. However, when examining the disciplines’ historical paths, there are important similarities to consider in determining how best to affect student learning in both mathematics and technology education. The authors contend that engineering design is the appropriate contextual area for integrating mathematics in technology education. Trajectories of Mathematics and Technology Education Pointing To Engineering Design The national learning standards associated with mathematics and technology education indicate a relationship between the disciplines of mathematics and technology education. Mathematics is referred to 30 times in the Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (International Technology Education Association (ITEA), 2000/2002) and technology is used over 20 times in the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics’ Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000). For example, standard three in the Standards for Technological Literacy states that “students will develop an understanding of the relationships among technologies and the connections between technology and other fields of study” (ITEA, 200/2002, p. 44). The Connections standard in the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics states that students will recognize and apply mathematics in contexts outside of mathematics, and the Problem Solving standard reads that students will solve problems that arise in mathematics and in other contexts. Both disciplines clearly include one another, at least in general terms. Their incorporation or relationship with each other appears to center on use. For example, upon review of these standards documents alone, the scope or purpose of technology in mathematics would appear to be that of instructional technology. Mathematics educators are primarily concerned with using technology to aid in instruction (e.g., computers, calculators, software) and facilitate student learning. Technology educators, on the other hand, are focused on how to use mathematics to understand, use, and design different technologies. Just as mathematics educators appear to see technology as a tool in service to solving mathematical problems, technology educators appear to see mathematics as a tool in service to solving technological problems (Merrill, Reese, & Daugherty, 2010). However, does a closer relationship exist between the two disciplines beside the onedimensional emphasis on use found in the standards? If a closer relationship were to exist, what might integrate the two disciplines? These two questions are the primary focus of this article. Moving beyond a simple analysis of standards documents, the historical trajectories of mathematics and technology education, as they relate to each other, are explored. By exploring these histories, a future point of integration through engineering design is explored. Mathematics Education and Technology Many reports have called for better preparation in mathematics and science, and for increased skills for the technology-rich workplace of the 21st century (American Association of University Women, 2000; Borgman et al., 2008; National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century, 2000; National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008). Yet, many parents and teachers consider mathematics as a very traditional process of technology-independent practice, focused on algorithms, facts, procedures, and so forth. The history of technology integration into mathematics is embedded in the developments and debates about mathematics education in more general terms. The “new mathematics movement” and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics’ (NCTM) standards-based reform are two T h e J o u rn a l o f Te c h n o lo g y S tu d ie s Trajectories of Mathematics and Technology Education Pointing To Engineering Design Jenny L. Daugherty, George C. Reese, and Chris Merrill 46
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指向工程设计的数学与技术教育轨迹。
通过对数学和技术教育的简要考察和比较,为讨论整合提供了背景。特别是,每个领域的成员都对越来越大的压力做出了回应,要求学生更好地为技术丰富、全球竞争的未来做好准备。基于每个学科的方法因课程和教学策略而异。然而,当研究学科的历史路径时,在确定如何最好地影响学生在数学和技术教育中的学习时,需要考虑重要的相似之处。作者认为,工程设计是将数学融入技术教育的合适语境领域。与数学和技术教育相关的国家学习标准表明了数学和技术教育学科之间的关系。在《技术素养标准:技术研究内容》(国际技术教育协会(ITEA), 2000/2002年)中,数学被提及30次,在全国数学教师委员会的《学校数学原理和标准》(2000年)中,技术被提及20多次。例如,《技术素养标准》中的标准三指出,“学生将发展对技术之间关系以及技术与其他研究领域之间联系的理解”(ITEA, 2002 /2002,第44页)。《学校数学原理与标准》中的“联系标准”指出,学生将在数学之外的环境中认识和应用数学,而“问题解决标准”则认为,学生将解决数学和其他环境中出现的问题。这两个学科显然包括彼此,至少在一般情况下。它们的结合或彼此之间的关系似乎以使用为中心。例如,仅在审查这些标准文件时,数学技术的范围或目的似乎是教学技术的范围或目的。数学教育者主要关心的是使用技术来辅助教学(例如,计算机、计算器、软件)并促进学生的学习。另一方面,技术教育者关注的是如何使用数学来理解、使用和设计不同的技术。正如数学教育者似乎将技术视为解决数学问题的工具一样,技术教育者似乎将数学视为解决技术问题的工具(Merrill, Reese, & Daugherty, 2010)。然而,除了标准中对使用的片面强调之外,这两个学科之间是否存在更密切的关系?如果存在一种更紧密的关系,那么什么可以整合这两个学科?这两个问题是本文的主要焦点。超越对标准文件的简单分析,探索数学和技术教育的历史轨迹,因为它们彼此相关。通过对这些历史的探索,探索了未来通过工程设计的整合点。许多报告呼吁在数学和科学方面做更好的准备,并为21世纪技术丰富的工作场所提高技能(美国大学妇女协会,2000;Borgman等人,2008;国家面向21世纪数学与科学教学委员会,2000;国家数学顾问小组,2008)。然而,许多家长和老师认为数学是一个非常传统的过程,与技术无关的实践,专注于算法、事实、程序等等。技术融入数学的历史嵌入在数学教育的发展和辩论更一般的术语。“新数学运动”和全国数学教师委员会(NCTM)以标准为基础的改革是《数学与技术教育的轨迹指向工程设计》一书的作者珍妮·l·多赫蒂、乔治·c·里斯和克里斯·梅里尔的两项研究成果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technology Education in New Zealand Comparing Functions, Costs, and Rewards of Quality Engineers and Six Sigma Black Belts Immediate impact of dynamic graphics instruction on learners of varied levels of spatial ability Effects of Mobile Phones on Students’ Academic Performance in Religious Education Teacher Shortage and Alternative Licensure Solutions for Technical Educators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1