On a numerical upper bound for the extended Goldbach conjecture

David Quarel
{"title":"On a numerical upper bound for the extended Goldbach conjecture","authors":"David Quarel","doi":"10.25911/5D9EFB1B88F6C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Goldbach conjecture states that every even number can be decomposed as the sum of two primes. Let $D(N)$ denote the number of such prime decompositions for an even $N$. It is known that $D(N)$ can be bounded above by $$ D(N) \\leq C^* \\Theta(N), \\quad \\Theta(N):= \\frac{N}{\\log^2 N}\\prod_{\\substack{p|N p>2}} \\left( 1 + \\frac{1}{p-2}\\right)\\prod_{p>2}\\left(1-\\frac{1}{(p-1)^2}\\right) $$ where $C^*$ denotes Chen's constant. It is conjectured that $C^*=2$. In 2004, Wu showed that $C^* \\leq 7.8209$. We attempted to replicate his work in computing Chen's constant, and in doing so we provide an improved approximation of the Buchstab function $\\omega(u)$, \\begin{align*} \\omega(u)=1/u, & \\quad (1\\leq u\\leq 2), (u \\omega(u))'=\\omega(u-1), & \\quad (u\\geq 2). \\end{align*} based on work done by Cheer and Goldston. For each interval $[j,j+1]$, they expressed $\\omega(u)$ as a Taylor expansion about $u=j+1$. We expanded about the point $u=j+0.5$, so $\\omega(u)$ was never evaluated more than $0.5$ away from the center of the Taylor expansion, which gave much stronger error bounds. \nIssues arose while using this Taylor expansion to compute the required integrals for Chen's constant, so we proceeded with solving the above differential equation to obtain $\\omega(u)$, and then integrating the result. Although the values that were obtained undershot Wu's results, we pressed on and refined Wu's work by discretising his integrals with finer granularity. The improvements to Chen's constant were negligible (as predicted by Wu). This provides experimental evidence, but not a proof, that were Wu's integrals computed on smaller intervals in exact form, the improvement to Chen's constant would be negligible. Thus, any substantial improvement on Chen's constant likely requires a radically different method to what Wu provided.","PeriodicalId":429168,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: History and Overview","volume":"645 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25911/5D9EFB1B88F6C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Goldbach conjecture states that every even number can be decomposed as the sum of two primes. Let $D(N)$ denote the number of such prime decompositions for an even $N$. It is known that $D(N)$ can be bounded above by $$ D(N) \leq C^* \Theta(N), \quad \Theta(N):= \frac{N}{\log^2 N}\prod_{\substack{p|N p>2}} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{p-2}\right)\prod_{p>2}\left(1-\frac{1}{(p-1)^2}\right) $$ where $C^*$ denotes Chen's constant. It is conjectured that $C^*=2$. In 2004, Wu showed that $C^* \leq 7.8209$. We attempted to replicate his work in computing Chen's constant, and in doing so we provide an improved approximation of the Buchstab function $\omega(u)$, \begin{align*} \omega(u)=1/u, & \quad (1\leq u\leq 2), (u \omega(u))'=\omega(u-1), & \quad (u\geq 2). \end{align*} based on work done by Cheer and Goldston. For each interval $[j,j+1]$, they expressed $\omega(u)$ as a Taylor expansion about $u=j+1$. We expanded about the point $u=j+0.5$, so $\omega(u)$ was never evaluated more than $0.5$ away from the center of the Taylor expansion, which gave much stronger error bounds. Issues arose while using this Taylor expansion to compute the required integrals for Chen's constant, so we proceeded with solving the above differential equation to obtain $\omega(u)$, and then integrating the result. Although the values that were obtained undershot Wu's results, we pressed on and refined Wu's work by discretising his integrals with finer granularity. The improvements to Chen's constant were negligible (as predicted by Wu). This provides experimental evidence, but not a proof, that were Wu's integrals computed on smaller intervals in exact form, the improvement to Chen's constant would be negligible. Thus, any substantial improvement on Chen's constant likely requires a radically different method to what Wu provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于扩展哥德巴赫猜想的数值上界
哥德巴赫猜想指出,每一个偶数都可以分解为两个素数的和。设$D(N)$表示偶数$N$的素数分解的次数。已知$D(N)$可以以$$ D(N) \leq C^* \Theta(N), \quad \Theta(N):= \frac{N}{\log^2 N}\prod_{\substack{p|N p>2}} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{p-2}\right)\prod_{p>2}\left(1-\frac{1}{(p-1)^2}\right) $$为界,其中$C^*$表示Chen常数。据推测$C^*=2$。2004年,吴展示了$C^* \leq 7.8209$。我们试图在计算Chen常数时复制他的工作,在这样做的过程中,我们基于Cheer和Goldston所做的工作提供了Buchstab函数$\omega(u)$, \begin{align*} \omega(u)=1/u, & \quad (1\leq u\leq 2), (u \omega(u))'=\omega(u-1), & \quad (u\geq 2). \end{align*}的改进近似值。对于每个区间$[j,j+1]$,他们将$\omega(u)$表示为关于$u=j+1$的泰勒展开式。我们对$u=j+0.5$点展开,所以$\omega(u)$的取值范围永远不会超过$0.5$,远离泰勒展开的中心,这给出了更强的误差界限。在使用泰勒展开式计算Chen常数所需的积分时出现了问题,因此我们继续求解上述微分方程以获得$\omega(u)$,然后对结果进行积分。虽然得到的值低于吴的结果,但我们通过用更细的粒度离散他的积分来继续和改进吴的工作。陈常数的改进可以忽略不计(正如吴所预测的那样)。这提供了实验证据,但不是证明,如果Wu的积分在更小的区间上以精确的形式计算,对Chen常数的改进可以忽略不计。因此,对Chen常数的任何实质性改进都可能需要一种与Wu提供的完全不同的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Automorphism Group of the Petersen Graph is Isomorphic to $S_5$. Early-Dynastic Tables from Southern Mesopotamia, or the Multiple Facets of the Quantification of Surfaces Teaching Programming for Mathematical Scientists The Classification of Magic SET Squares The role of history in learning and teaching mathematics: A personal perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1