Protein Allergenicity: Rat Model

L. Knippels, A. Penninks
{"title":"Protein Allergenicity: Rat Model","authors":"L. Knippels, A. Penninks","doi":"10.1080/08865140214381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The possibilities of modern biotechnology have resulted in the introduction of new generations of food and food ingredients and this process is expected to continue further in the near future. In particular, the development and market introduction of genetically engineered food crops has gained much attention in the past few years. For these novel foods, a toxicological evaluation and risk assessment are in most cases major items in their safety evaluation. In food, some proteins (i.e., proteins from peanut, egg-white, tree nuts, fish, etc.) are responsible for the development of food allergy. The potential allergenicity of genetically engineered crops, usually containing novel proteins from nonfood origins, has become an important issue in safety evaluation. There is, however, no universal, reliable, and relevant single test to evaluate the allergenic potency of food products and a case-by-case approach is suggested (1). The best known allergy approach, in which the source of the gene plays a central role, was developed jointly by the International Biotechnology Council and the International Life Science Institute (ILSI) Allergy and Immunology Institute and published in 1996 (2). This so-called IFBC=ILSI decision tree recommended, based on the data available then, that when transgenic proteins were derived from nonfood sources a careful stepwise process should be followed. Attention should be given to several factors, including amino acid sequence homology and various physicochemical properties such as heat and digestive stability of the protein. For transgenic products derived from known allergenic foods several in vitro and in vivo test are available, using allergic patients and=or their serum, that will most likely result in a conclusive assessment of its potential allergenicity. Unfortunately,","PeriodicalId":402874,"journal":{"name":"Comments on Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comments on Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08865140214381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The possibilities of modern biotechnology have resulted in the introduction of new generations of food and food ingredients and this process is expected to continue further in the near future. In particular, the development and market introduction of genetically engineered food crops has gained much attention in the past few years. For these novel foods, a toxicological evaluation and risk assessment are in most cases major items in their safety evaluation. In food, some proteins (i.e., proteins from peanut, egg-white, tree nuts, fish, etc.) are responsible for the development of food allergy. The potential allergenicity of genetically engineered crops, usually containing novel proteins from nonfood origins, has become an important issue in safety evaluation. There is, however, no universal, reliable, and relevant single test to evaluate the allergenic potency of food products and a case-by-case approach is suggested (1). The best known allergy approach, in which the source of the gene plays a central role, was developed jointly by the International Biotechnology Council and the International Life Science Institute (ILSI) Allergy and Immunology Institute and published in 1996 (2). This so-called IFBC=ILSI decision tree recommended, based on the data available then, that when transgenic proteins were derived from nonfood sources a careful stepwise process should be followed. Attention should be given to several factors, including amino acid sequence homology and various physicochemical properties such as heat and digestive stability of the protein. For transgenic products derived from known allergenic foods several in vitro and in vivo test are available, using allergic patients and=or their serum, that will most likely result in a conclusive assessment of its potential allergenicity. Unfortunately,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蛋白质致敏性:大鼠模型
现代生物技术的可能性导致了新一代食品和食品成分的引入,预计这一进程将在不久的将来进一步继续。特别是近年来,转基因粮食作物的开发和市场推广受到了广泛关注。对于这些新型食品,毒理学评价和风险评价是其安全性评价的主要内容。在食物中,某些蛋白质(即来自花生、蛋清、树坚果、鱼等的蛋白质)是导致食物过敏的原因。转基因作物通常含有非食品来源的新蛋白质,其潜在的致敏性已成为安全性评价中的一个重要问题。然而,目前还没有通用的、可靠的、相关的单一测试来评估食品的致敏效力,因此建议采用具体情况具体分析的方法(1)。最著名的过敏方法是由国际生物技术理事会和国际生命科学研究所(ILSI)过敏和免疫学研究所联合开发的,并于1996年发表(2)。根据现有的数据,当转基因蛋白从非食物来源中提取时,应该遵循一个谨慎的循序渐进的过程。应注意几个因素,包括氨基酸序列的同源性和各种理化性质,如蛋白质的耐热性和消化稳定性。对于从已知致敏食物中提取的转基因产品,有几种体外和体内试验可用,使用过敏患者及其血清,这很可能导致对其潜在致敏性的结结性评估。不幸的是,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overview: Biomarkers of Pollution in Aquatic Animals Current and Future Perspectives Using Biomarkers to Assess Pollution in Aquatic Ecosystems Global Analysis of Biomarker Responses in Aquatic Organisms Exposed to Contaminants Total Oxyradical Scavenging Capacity as an Index of Susceptibility to Oxidative Stress in Marine Organisms Annelids and Nematodes as Sentinels of Environmental Pollution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1