GMM and OLS Estimation and Inference for New Keynesian Phillips Curve

H. Vinod
{"title":"GMM and OLS Estimation and Inference for New Keynesian Phillips Curve","authors":"H. Vinod","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1560622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers estimation situations where identification, endogeneity and non-spherical regression error problems are present. Instead of always using GMM despite weak instruments to solve the endogeneity, it is possible to first check whether endogeneity is serious enough to cause inconsistency in the particular problem at hand. We show how to use Maximum Entropy bootstrap (meboot) for nonstationary time series data and check `convergence in probability' and `almost sure convergence' by evaluating the proportion of sample paths straying outside error bounds as the sample size increases. The new Keynesian Phillips curve (NKPC) ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation for US data finds little endogeneity-induced inconsistency and that GMM seems to worsen it. The potential `lack of identification' problem is solved by replacing the traditional pivot which divides an estimate by its standard error by the Godambe pivot, as explained in Vinod (2008) and Vinod (2010), leading to superior confidence intervals for deep parameters of the NKPC model.","PeriodicalId":221813,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Economics Department Working Paper Series","volume":"284 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Economics Department Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1560622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper considers estimation situations where identification, endogeneity and non-spherical regression error problems are present. Instead of always using GMM despite weak instruments to solve the endogeneity, it is possible to first check whether endogeneity is serious enough to cause inconsistency in the particular problem at hand. We show how to use Maximum Entropy bootstrap (meboot) for nonstationary time series data and check `convergence in probability' and `almost sure convergence' by evaluating the proportion of sample paths straying outside error bounds as the sample size increases. The new Keynesian Phillips curve (NKPC) ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation for US data finds little endogeneity-induced inconsistency and that GMM seems to worsen it. The potential `lack of identification' problem is solved by replacing the traditional pivot which divides an estimate by its standard error by the Godambe pivot, as explained in Vinod (2008) and Vinod (2010), leading to superior confidence intervals for deep parameters of the NKPC model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新凯恩斯菲利普斯曲线的GMM和OLS估计与推断
本文考虑了存在辨识、内生性和非球面回归误差问题的估计情况。与其总是使用GMM来解决内生性问题,不如先检查内生性是否严重到足以导致手头特定问题的不一致。我们展示了如何对非平稳时间序列数据使用最大熵引导(meboot),并通过评估随样本量增加而偏离误差界限的样本路径的比例来检查“概率收敛”和“几乎肯定收敛”。对美国数据的新凯恩斯-菲利普斯曲线(NKPC)普通最小二乘(OLS)估计发现,几乎没有内源性引起的不一致,而GMM似乎使这种不一致进一步恶化。正如Vinod(2008)和Vinod(2010)所解释的那样,通过取代传统的枢轴,将估计除以其标准误差除以Godambe枢轴,可以解决潜在的“缺乏识别”问题,从而为NKPC模型的深层参数提供优越的置信区间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Fiscal Rules Matter? Menu Implementability and Practical Pricing Schemes Quality Education and Tailor-made Skills Development is Needed to Solve Unemployment Problem in Ghana A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing Fine-Tuning the Equivalent Strike Framework for Bespoke CDO Pricing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1