Intuitive Eating and Weight Restrictive Practices among Dietitians in Kuwait

Dalal Alkazemi, A. Saleh, Lemia H Shaban, M. Al-Hilal
{"title":"Intuitive Eating and Weight Restrictive Practices among Dietitians in Kuwait","authors":"Dalal Alkazemi, A. Saleh, Lemia H Shaban, M. Al-Hilal","doi":"10.18502/AJNE.V4I1.4481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Dietitians are healthcare team members responsible for counseling patients with weight concerns. Both traditional/restrictive and intuitive eating/nonrestrictive practices are used with clients seeking weight loss. However, little is known about the weight management practices used with clients by dietitians in Kuwait, which are often related to the dietitians’ knowledge, attitudes, and work experience. Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes regarding intuitive eating among dietitians dealing with clients for weight management in Kuwait and describe their use of restrictive versus nonrestrictive dietary practices. Method This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. A self-administered survey was distributed among dietitians working with clients for weight management in public and private clinics. Results In total, 163 participants completed the survey. Most dietitians (81.6%) had not heard of intuitive eating as an independent approach to weight loss and scored low on knowledge of intuitive eating; however, many demonstrated positive attitudes towards intuitive eating (68%). Moreover, dietitians in Kuwait used both restrictive/traditional (69.31%) and nonrestrictive/intuitive eating (79.82%) weight management approaches to counsel clients. Total knowledge was positively correlated with use of nonrestrictive/intuitive eating (r=.259, p=.003) and traditional/restrictive practices (r=.227, p=.009). Years of experience was not related to either practice style. Conclusions Dietitians are combining both restrictive and nonrestrictive approaches for weight management with clients, and their practices are related to knowledge. These findings underscore the importance of continuous education for dietitians working in all sectors in Kuwait.","PeriodicalId":418965,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Nutrition and Exercise (AJNE)","volume":"112 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Nutrition and Exercise (AJNE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/AJNE.V4I1.4481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Dietitians are healthcare team members responsible for counseling patients with weight concerns. Both traditional/restrictive and intuitive eating/nonrestrictive practices are used with clients seeking weight loss. However, little is known about the weight management practices used with clients by dietitians in Kuwait, which are often related to the dietitians’ knowledge, attitudes, and work experience. Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes regarding intuitive eating among dietitians dealing with clients for weight management in Kuwait and describe their use of restrictive versus nonrestrictive dietary practices. Method This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. A self-administered survey was distributed among dietitians working with clients for weight management in public and private clinics. Results In total, 163 participants completed the survey. Most dietitians (81.6%) had not heard of intuitive eating as an independent approach to weight loss and scored low on knowledge of intuitive eating; however, many demonstrated positive attitudes towards intuitive eating (68%). Moreover, dietitians in Kuwait used both restrictive/traditional (69.31%) and nonrestrictive/intuitive eating (79.82%) weight management approaches to counsel clients. Total knowledge was positively correlated with use of nonrestrictive/intuitive eating (r=.259, p=.003) and traditional/restrictive practices (r=.227, p=.009). Years of experience was not related to either practice style. Conclusions Dietitians are combining both restrictive and nonrestrictive approaches for weight management with clients, and their practices are related to knowledge. These findings underscore the importance of continuous education for dietitians working in all sectors in Kuwait.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直觉饮食和体重限制做法的营养师在科威特
背景:营养师是负责为体重问题患者提供咨询的医疗团队成员。传统/限制性饮食和直觉性饮食/非限制性饮食都适用于寻求减肥的客户。然而,科威特的营养师对客户的体重管理实践知之甚少,这通常与营养师的知识、态度和工作经验有关。目的本研究的目的是评估在科威特处理体重管理客户的营养师中关于直觉饮食的知识和态度,并描述他们使用限制性和非限制性饮食实践。方法采用横断面描述性研究。在公共和私人诊所为客户提供体重管理的营养师中分发了一份自我管理的调查。结果共有163名参与者完成了调查。大多数营养师(81.6%)没有听说过直觉饮食作为一种独立的减肥方法,在直觉饮食知识方面得分较低;然而,许多人对直觉饮食表现出积极的态度(68%)。此外,科威特的营养师使用限制性/传统饮食(69.31%)和非限制性/直觉饮食(79.82%)两种体重管理方法来为客户提供咨询。总知识与使用非限制性/直觉饮食呈正相关(r=。259, p=.003)和传统/限制性做法(r=。227年,p = .009)。多年的经验与任何一种练习风格都无关。结论营养师对客户的体重管理采用了限制性和非限制性相结合的方法,他们的做法与知识有关。这些发现强调了在科威特所有部门工作的营养师继续教育的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of Ergogenic Substances amongst Bodybuilding Athletes Around Polokwane Municipality, Limpopo Province, South Africa Association Between Dietary Quality, Socioeconomic Level, Body Mass Index, and Age in Adolescents (Eastern Algeria): A Cross-sectional Study Use of Herbal Medicine Among the Public in Abu Dhabi Integration of Healthy Eating Habits and Physical Activity through Nutrition Care Process to Tackle the Obesity Epidemic: A Narrative Review of the Evidence Microbial Load of Chicken Shawerma and the Handlers’ Compliance with Food Safety Practices in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1