A study of teacher feedback that leads to skill performance of children in flag football unit

Moe Arisaka, Yoko Onizawa, Y. Kawata
{"title":"A study of teacher feedback that leads to skill performance of children in flag football unit","authors":"Moe Arisaka, Yoko Onizawa, Y. Kawata","doi":"10.7219/jjses.39.1_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of teacher’s feedback on children’s skill performance. The subject was a flag football unit of nine hours of elementary school sixth graders. 1) Using formative evaluations of Takahashi et al. (1994) for these classes, it found that the classes were accepted from children with highest evaluations. 2) In these classes, the author of this study extracted teacher feedback from the video. Based on the analysis category of Fukami and Takahashi (2003), we analyzed how much they can lead to skill performance. As a result, it was revealed that 79.8% of the teacher’s skillful feedback led to children’s skill performance. 3) Next, the author examined these feedbacks from children’s acceptance method. When considering the extent to which the child received teacher feedback, the child received feedback from the teacher at 78.3% on average on an average unit, of which 73.3% answered that they were helpful. 4) Then, we surveyed how much their feedback matched what the children answered that they received it, and investigated the subsequent skills achievements for those matched with the feedback given by the teacher. Then, it was 55% that the feedback that the child responded to and the feedback actually made by the teacher were in agreement, and it turned out that the skill achievement seen from the child’s receipt was 30.6%. From these facts, there was a difference between the skill performance as seen from the teacher feedback and the skill performance as seen from the feedback that the child responded. Therefore, even if the child does not accept it, teacher feedback leads to child’s skill performance if appropriate feedback is made according to the learning situation of the child. ス ポ ー ツ 教 育 学 研 究 <原著論文> 2019. Vol.39, No.1, pp. 19-31 スポーツ教育学研究 第 39巻 第 1号 2019年 5月","PeriodicalId":119114,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Sport Education Studies","volume":"10 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Sport Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7219/jjses.39.1_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of teacher’s feedback on children’s skill performance. The subject was a flag football unit of nine hours of elementary school sixth graders. 1) Using formative evaluations of Takahashi et al. (1994) for these classes, it found that the classes were accepted from children with highest evaluations. 2) In these classes, the author of this study extracted teacher feedback from the video. Based on the analysis category of Fukami and Takahashi (2003), we analyzed how much they can lead to skill performance. As a result, it was revealed that 79.8% of the teacher’s skillful feedback led to children’s skill performance. 3) Next, the author examined these feedbacks from children’s acceptance method. When considering the extent to which the child received teacher feedback, the child received feedback from the teacher at 78.3% on average on an average unit, of which 73.3% answered that they were helpful. 4) Then, we surveyed how much their feedback matched what the children answered that they received it, and investigated the subsequent skills achievements for those matched with the feedback given by the teacher. Then, it was 55% that the feedback that the child responded to and the feedback actually made by the teacher were in agreement, and it turned out that the skill achievement seen from the child’s receipt was 30.6%. From these facts, there was a difference between the skill performance as seen from the teacher feedback and the skill performance as seen from the feedback that the child responded. Therefore, even if the child does not accept it, teacher feedback leads to child’s skill performance if appropriate feedback is made according to the learning situation of the child. ス ポ ー ツ 教 育 学 研 究 <原著論文> 2019. Vol.39, No.1, pp. 19-31 スポーツ教育学研究 第 39巻 第 1号 2019年 5月
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师反馈对旗足球单元儿童技能表现的影响研究
本研究旨在探讨教师反馈对幼儿技能表现的影响。主题是一个旗旗橄榄球单元的九小时小学六年级学生。1)利用Takahashi等人(1994)对这些课程的形成性评价,发现这些课程被评价最高的儿童所接受。2)在这些课堂上,本研究的作者从视频中提取老师的反馈。基于Fukami和Takahashi(2003)的分析类别,我们分析了它们对技能绩效的影响程度。结果显示,79.8%的教师的技能反馈导致了儿童的技能表现。3)接下来,笔者从儿童的接受方式来考察这些反馈。在考虑到孩子得到老师反馈的程度时,在一个平均单元中,孩子得到老师反馈的平均比例为78.3%,其中73.3%的人回答他们是有帮助的。4)然后,我们调查了他们的反馈与孩子们回答他们收到的反馈的匹配程度,并调查了那些与老师给出的反馈匹配的孩子随后的技能成就。然后,孩子回应的反馈与老师实际给出的反馈一致的比例是55%,从孩子的收据上看到的技能成就是30.6%。从这些事实来看,从教师反馈中看到的技能表现与从儿童回应的反馈中看到的技能表现之间存在差异。因此,即使孩子不接受,如果根据孩子的学习情况给予适当的反馈,教师的反馈也会导致孩子的技能表现。2019。第一,39胜38负页。スポーツ教育学研究第39巻第1号2019年5月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
小学校体育科の水泳運動における第4学年の児童を対象とした面かぶりクロールの観察的動作評価基準の作成とその信頼性・妥当性の検証 アスリートの視点から、第3期スポーツ基本計画に期待すること —スポーツ基本計画の実行を感じる瞬間が、増えること— 小学校低学年の体育授業において再適用した運動有能感を高める指導方略の有効性の検討:2年生のボール投げ単元を対象に Trend of Physical Education Classes Research with Mixed Methods Research in the English Literature 中学校保健体育教師の男女共習体育授業に対する認識に関する一考察:体育教師の職業的社会化の視点から
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1