The Urgency of Regulations Revision Related to Filing Bankruptcy and Postponing Debt Payment Obligations Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

Centia Sabrina Nuriskia, Ahmad Yoga Novaliansyah
{"title":"The Urgency of Regulations Revision Related to Filing Bankruptcy and Postponing Debt Payment Obligations Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Centia Sabrina Nuriskia, Ahmad Yoga Novaliansyah","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v5i2.50383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to analyze the requirements of bankruptcy regulations and postponement of debt payment obligations on the increase in bankruptcy filings and delays in debt payment obligations in the middle of the COVID-19 Pandemic. This research uses a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach that is supported by primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this research indicate that the increase in filing for bankrBankruptcydelays in paying debt obligations at the Commercial Court is due to unclear rules regarding filing for bankrBankruptcyecially the requirements in filing for bank bankruptcy do not specify the amount of debt that can be filed for bankrBankruptcyre is a need for consideration in making and stipulating bankruptcy arrangements, both in the Draft Civil Procedure Code and the Bankruptcy Law and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, especially on issues: the amount of debtor debt, simple evidence, creditors holding guarantees in bankrBankruptcyminal confiscation in bankrBankruptcyker wage rating, bankruptcy estate settlement, and position of the arbitration award in bankruptcy cases.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"321 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Scientia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i2.50383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the requirements of bankruptcy regulations and postponement of debt payment obligations on the increase in bankruptcy filings and delays in debt payment obligations in the middle of the COVID-19 Pandemic. This research uses a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach that is supported by primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this research indicate that the increase in filing for bankrBankruptcydelays in paying debt obligations at the Commercial Court is due to unclear rules regarding filing for bankrBankruptcyecially the requirements in filing for bank bankruptcy do not specify the amount of debt that can be filed for bankrBankruptcyre is a need for consideration in making and stipulating bankruptcy arrangements, both in the Draft Civil Procedure Code and the Bankruptcy Law and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, especially on issues: the amount of debtor debt, simple evidence, creditors holding guarantees in bankrBankruptcyminal confiscation in bankrBankruptcyker wage rating, bankruptcy estate settlement, and position of the arbitration award in bankruptcy cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新冠肺炎大流行的情况下,迫切需要修改有关破产和债务延期偿还的规定
本研究的目的是分析在新冠肺炎大流行期间,破产法规和债务偿还义务延期对破产申请和债务偿还义务延期增加的要求。本研究采用了规范性的法律研究方法,其中包括法定方法和概念方法,并以一级和二级法律材料为基础。本研究结果表明,银行破产申请的增加,在商事法庭延迟偿还债务的原因是由于银行破产申请的规则不明确,特别是银行破产申请的要求没有规定可以申请破产的债务数额,这是制定和规定破产安排时需要考虑的问题。在《民事诉讼法(草案)》和《破产法(草案)》以及《债务义务中止》等方面,特别是对债务人债务数额、简单证据、银行债权人持有担保、银行破产没收、破产人工资等级、破产财产清算、破产案件仲裁裁决的定位等问题进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positivization of Fatwas of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council in the Sharia Banking Law: Problems and Challenges Land Subsidence Policy in the Context of Good Governance Principles (Comparing Indonesia and Japan) Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Vietnam’s New Generation Free Trade Agreements – Challenges and Recommendations Rejection of Former Shia Community in Sampang Perspective on Human Rights Law: Discourse of Religious Rights and Freedom in Indonesia Comparative Analysis Between Employees Provident Fund (EPF) & Private Retirement Scheme (PRS) in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1