Inside the Entrepreneurial Event: Creating Schemata of Opportunity for New Business

Vesa Puhakka
{"title":"Inside the Entrepreneurial Event: Creating Schemata of Opportunity for New Business","authors":"Vesa Puhakka","doi":"10.5772/37328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study approaches entrepreneurship from the angle that nothing is more common than the most personal (see Rogers 1989). This research is my interpretation of entrepreneurship and the objective is to discuss the nature and concept of entrepreneurship. When I present my personal interpretations of entrepreneurship, I hope that it touches as many as possible and so would be as prevailing as possible. But not so that my view is \"The\" definition of entrepreneurship, rather that it would arouse discussion and diverseness in entrepreneurship research and especially in the creation of new business activities amongst businesses, and would support the possible doubts and thoughts of others, which there no doubt is, and so would support the diversity that has prevailed in entrepreneurship research. I admire the work of many leading researchers of the field, through which they have been able to redirect entrepreneurship research, but I also suspect that something valuable is being thrown away. As the conception of entrepreneurship unifies, the questioning, recreating, alternativeness and the testing of new ideas decreases. Entrepreneurship researchers should perhaps perceive that this may be part of the field’s evolution and that unity is on some time frame dangerous to the vitality of research. A need amongst researchers to reach equilibrium is interacting in the background, even though the phenomenon of research is usually seen as being continually out of balance – there is a significant conflict between the two.","PeriodicalId":268317,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Individuals (Topic)","volume":"184 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Individuals (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/37328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study approaches entrepreneurship from the angle that nothing is more common than the most personal (see Rogers 1989). This research is my interpretation of entrepreneurship and the objective is to discuss the nature and concept of entrepreneurship. When I present my personal interpretations of entrepreneurship, I hope that it touches as many as possible and so would be as prevailing as possible. But not so that my view is "The" definition of entrepreneurship, rather that it would arouse discussion and diverseness in entrepreneurship research and especially in the creation of new business activities amongst businesses, and would support the possible doubts and thoughts of others, which there no doubt is, and so would support the diversity that has prevailed in entrepreneurship research. I admire the work of many leading researchers of the field, through which they have been able to redirect entrepreneurship research, but I also suspect that something valuable is being thrown away. As the conception of entrepreneurship unifies, the questioning, recreating, alternativeness and the testing of new ideas decreases. Entrepreneurship researchers should perhaps perceive that this may be part of the field’s evolution and that unity is on some time frame dangerous to the vitality of research. A need amongst researchers to reach equilibrium is interacting in the background, even though the phenomenon of research is usually seen as being continually out of balance – there is a significant conflict between the two.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创业活动内部:为新业务创造机会图式
这项研究从最个人的角度来看待企业家精神(见Rogers 1989)。本研究是我对企业家精神的解读,目的是探讨企业家精神的本质和概念。当我阐述我个人对企业家精神的理解时,我希望它能触及尽可能多的人,从而尽可能地流行起来。但并不是说我的观点是“企业家精神”的定义,而是说它会在企业家精神研究中引起讨论和多样性,特别是在企业之间创造新的商业活动,并且会支持其他人可能的怀疑和想法,这毫无疑问,因此会支持在企业家精神研究中盛行的多样性。我钦佩该领域许多顶尖研究人员的工作,他们通过这些工作改变了创业研究的方向,但我也怀疑,一些有价值的东西正在被抛弃。随着创业观念的统一,对新思想的质疑、再创造、替代和检验减少了。创业研究人员也许应该意识到,这可能是该领域演变的一部分,而统一在某种时间框架内对研究的活力是危险的。研究人员之间达到平衡的需求在背景中相互作用,即使研究现象通常被视为不断失去平衡-两者之间存在重大冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurial Hustle: Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Entrepreneurial Hustle Entrepreneurial Education and Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation: An Experts’ Perspective. An Empirical Delphi Study Women as Independent Workers in the Gig Economy Ethnicity and Tax Filing Behavior A Cautionary Note on Micro-credentialing in Entrepreneurship Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1