Spending in a time of “Retrenchment”

Steven J. Ericson
{"title":"Spending in a time of “Retrenchment”","authors":"Steven J. Ericson","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501746918.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter shows how the Matsukata reform brought about a shift in industrial policy. This indicated a move away from direct state intervention in the economy and toward the creation of a favorable institutional setting for the growth of private enterprise. Yet, for all of Matsukata's free enterprise rhetoric—“the Government should never attempt to compete with the people in pursuing lines of industry or commerce”—he deviated from classical economic liberalism by increasing industrial spending in fiscal 1881–1885 compared to the previous four years and by maintaining fairly heavy state involvement in the economy. Likewise, his industrial policy contrasts with the emphasis of neoliberal IMF orthodoxy on privatization insofar as the Meiji government sold off hardly any of its enterprises until late in the Matsukata financial reform. Although, the paucity of sales until mid-1884 was a function more of the shortage of buyers than of Matsukata's lack of commitment to supporting private initiative.","PeriodicalId":375132,"journal":{"name":"Financial Stabilization in Meiji Japan","volume":"21 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Stabilization in Meiji Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501746918.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter shows how the Matsukata reform brought about a shift in industrial policy. This indicated a move away from direct state intervention in the economy and toward the creation of a favorable institutional setting for the growth of private enterprise. Yet, for all of Matsukata's free enterprise rhetoric—“the Government should never attempt to compete with the people in pursuing lines of industry or commerce”—he deviated from classical economic liberalism by increasing industrial spending in fiscal 1881–1885 compared to the previous four years and by maintaining fairly heavy state involvement in the economy. Likewise, his industrial policy contrasts with the emphasis of neoliberal IMF orthodoxy on privatization insofar as the Meiji government sold off hardly any of its enterprises until late in the Matsukata financial reform. Although, the paucity of sales until mid-1884 was a function more of the shortage of buyers than of Matsukata's lack of commitment to supporting private initiative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“紧缩”时期的开支
本章展示了松方改革如何带来产业政策的转变。这表明政府将不再直接干预经济,转而为私营企业的发展创造有利的制度环境。然而,对于松方的所有自由企业言论——“政府永远不应该试图在追求工业或商业方面与人民竞争”——他偏离了古典经济自由主义,在1881-1885财政年度,与前四年相比,增加了工业支出,并保持了相当大的国家对经济的参与。同样,他的产业政策与国际货币基金组织强调私有化的新自由主义正统观点形成鲜明对比,因为明治政府直到松方金融改革后期才出售了几乎所有的企业。尽管如此,直到1884年中期,销售的匮乏更多的是买家的短缺,而不是松方缺乏支持私人主动性的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter From “Ōkuma Finance” to “Matsukata Finance,” 1873–1881 Acknowledgments 3. Austerity and Expansion: The Matsukata Reform, 1881–1885 6. “Poor Peasant, Poor Country”? The Matsukata Deflation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1