Disaster Prevention Through Intelligent Monitoring

Andy Painting, D. Sanders
{"title":"Disaster Prevention Through Intelligent Monitoring","authors":"Andy Painting, D. Sanders","doi":"10.56094/jss.v52i3.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite various tools and systems that can monitor complex engineering environments, bad things still happen regularly in all types of engineering industries. An intelligent system designed to monitor certain indicators, regardless of engineering industry, that might predict catastrophes would ultimately reduce the potential for loss of human life and property. \nIn this article, 10 catastrophes were researched to identify their root causes and the various root cause combinations. These documented catastrophes covered a broad spectrum of engineering including oil, gas, nuclear, rail, air and space. The root causes identified in the investigation reports were grouped under 10 trait headings and their efficacy was tested using a qualitative fault tree of a credible catastrophic failure scenario. Each trait was adjusted to signify various levels of failure and fed into the prototype system representing the fault tree. \nWhile near real-time monitoring and trend analysis was investigated and shown to support an intelligent system that might predict catastrophe, one of the surprising additional results from the research was highlighting the need to standardize the approach to investigative reports and audits of existing systems. Reporting in the same “technical language” and looking for specific condition levels for each of the traits could provide a true picture of asset condition and the required funding prioritization, as well as assisting the dissemination of findings to all engineering industries.","PeriodicalId":250838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of System Safety","volume":"2 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56094/jss.v52i3.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite various tools and systems that can monitor complex engineering environments, bad things still happen regularly in all types of engineering industries. An intelligent system designed to monitor certain indicators, regardless of engineering industry, that might predict catastrophes would ultimately reduce the potential for loss of human life and property. In this article, 10 catastrophes were researched to identify their root causes and the various root cause combinations. These documented catastrophes covered a broad spectrum of engineering including oil, gas, nuclear, rail, air and space. The root causes identified in the investigation reports were grouped under 10 trait headings and their efficacy was tested using a qualitative fault tree of a credible catastrophic failure scenario. Each trait was adjusted to signify various levels of failure and fed into the prototype system representing the fault tree. While near real-time monitoring and trend analysis was investigated and shown to support an intelligent system that might predict catastrophe, one of the surprising additional results from the research was highlighting the need to standardize the approach to investigative reports and audits of existing systems. Reporting in the same “technical language” and looking for specific condition levels for each of the traits could provide a true picture of asset condition and the required funding prioritization, as well as assisting the dissemination of findings to all engineering industries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能监控防灾
尽管有各种各样的工具和系统可以监控复杂的工程环境,但在所有类型的工程行业中,不好的事情仍然经常发生。一个旨在监测某些指标的智能系统,无论其工程行业如何,都可能预测灾难,最终将减少人类生命和财产损失的可能性。在本文中,研究了10个灾难,以确定其根本原因和各种根本原因组合。这些记录在案的灾难涵盖了广泛的工程领域,包括石油、天然气、核能、铁路、航空和太空。调查报告中确定的根本原因分为10个特征标题,并使用可靠的灾难性故障场景的定性故障树来测试其有效性。每个特征被调整以表示不同级别的故障,并输入到表示故障树的原型系统中。虽然近实时监测和趋势分析被调查并显示支持可能预测灾难的智能系统,但该研究的另一个令人惊讶的结果是强调了对现有系统的调查报告和审计方法进行标准化的必要性。用相同的“技术语言”进行报告,并为每个特征寻找特定的条件水平,可以提供资产状况的真实图景和所需的资金优先级,并有助于将研究结果传播到所有工程行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proposing the Use of Hazard Analysis for Machine Learning Data Sets Review of the Latest Developments in Automotive Safety Standardization for Driving Automation Systems Human Reliability Analysis using a Human Factors Hazard Model Incremental Assurance Through Eliminative Argumentation System Safety Bookshelf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1