A Combinatorial Proof for the Dowry Problem

Xujun Liu, O. Milenkovic, G. Moustakides
{"title":"A Combinatorial Proof for the Dowry Problem","authors":"Xujun Liu, O. Milenkovic, G. Moustakides","doi":"10.1109/ITW55543.2023.10161638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Secretary problem is a classical sequential decision-making question that can be succinctly described as follows: a set of rank-ordered applicants are interviewed sequentially for a single position. Once an applicant is interviewed, an immediate and irrevocable decision is made if the person is to be offered the job or not and only applicants observed so far can be used in the decision process. The problem of interest is to identify the stopping rule that maximizes the probability of hiring the highest-ranked applicant. A multiple-choice version of the Secretary problem, known as the Dowry problem, assumes that one is given a fixed integer budget for the total number of selections allowed to choose the best applicant. It has been solved using tools from dynamic programming and optimal stopping theory. We provide the first combinatorial proof for a related new query-based model for which we are allowed to solicit the response of an expert to determine if an applicant is optimal. Since the selection criteria differ from those of the Dowry problem, we obtain nonidentical expected stopping times.","PeriodicalId":439800,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)","volume":"1040 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITW55543.2023.10161638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Secretary problem is a classical sequential decision-making question that can be succinctly described as follows: a set of rank-ordered applicants are interviewed sequentially for a single position. Once an applicant is interviewed, an immediate and irrevocable decision is made if the person is to be offered the job or not and only applicants observed so far can be used in the decision process. The problem of interest is to identify the stopping rule that maximizes the probability of hiring the highest-ranked applicant. A multiple-choice version of the Secretary problem, known as the Dowry problem, assumes that one is given a fixed integer budget for the total number of selections allowed to choose the best applicant. It has been solved using tools from dynamic programming and optimal stopping theory. We provide the first combinatorial proof for a related new query-based model for which we are allowed to solicit the response of an expert to determine if an applicant is optimal. Since the selection criteria differ from those of the Dowry problem, we obtain nonidentical expected stopping times.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嫁妆问题的一个组合证明
秘书问题是一个经典的顺序决策问题,它可以简洁地描述为:一组按等级排序的申请人依次面试一个职位。一旦应聘者接受了面试,就会立即做出一个不可撤销的决定,决定是否给这个人提供工作,只有到目前为止观察到的申请人才能被用于决策过程。我们感兴趣的问题是确定一个停止规则,使雇用排名最高的申请人的可能性最大化。秘书问题的一个选择题版本,也就是嫁妆问题,假设一个人有一个固定的整数预算,用来选择最好的申请人。利用动态规划和最优停止理论的工具进行了求解。我们为一个相关的基于查询的新模型提供了第一个组合证明,我们被允许征求专家的回应,以确定申请人是否是最佳的。由于选择标准不同于嫁妆问题的选择标准,我们得到了不相同的期望停止时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Code at the Receiver, Decode at the Sender: GRAND with Feedback The Secrecy Capacity of Gaussian Wiretap Channels with Rate-Limited Help at the Encoder Asymmetric tree correlation testing for graph alignment Symmetric 4-adic Complexity of Quaternary Sequences of Length pq with Low Autocorrelation Deterministic K-Identification For Slow Fading Channels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1