COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR FAMILIES IN SELECTED EUROPEAN COUNTRIES WITH A FOCUS ON CASH BENEFITS

V. Kuchařová
{"title":"COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR FAMILIES IN SELECTED EUROPEAN COUNTRIES WITH A FOCUS ON CASH BENEFITS","authors":"V. Kuchařová","doi":"10.25142/vssp.2022.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial support measures retain their central role in today's family policy, which is increasingly important in a time when more and more families are being affected by more difficult economic conditions. The aim of this paper is to compare national family benefits systems in the context of family policy models. National models are currently more a mix of classic 'ideal types', with greater or lesser dominance of the original features, and benefit systems differ particularly in the details of setting, the degree of generosity and targeting, and the structure of forms of financial support. Cash benefits are a key component of overall financial support for families in half of the countries surveyed. In Sweden and Spain, support for family services is the main contributor to total expenditure. Benefit-generous countries have not only generous basic benefits but also a variable benefit system that takes into account different types of families and the variety of situations in which it is desirable to support families with children financially. The role of benefits in meeting two selected family policy objectives – promoting fertility and eliminating child poverty - is not clear from the comparisons made. Both fertility and child poverty indicators are most favourable in countries that have a comprehensive approach to family policy and a mix of direct and indirect instruments. The analysis confirms the need for systemic integration of cash benefits with other family policy measures if the benefit system is to fulfil its role.","PeriodicalId":125382,"journal":{"name":"Veřejná správa a sociální politika","volume":"46 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veřejná správa a sociální politika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25142/vssp.2022.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Financial support measures retain their central role in today's family policy, which is increasingly important in a time when more and more families are being affected by more difficult economic conditions. The aim of this paper is to compare national family benefits systems in the context of family policy models. National models are currently more a mix of classic 'ideal types', with greater or lesser dominance of the original features, and benefit systems differ particularly in the details of setting, the degree of generosity and targeting, and the structure of forms of financial support. Cash benefits are a key component of overall financial support for families in half of the countries surveyed. In Sweden and Spain, support for family services is the main contributor to total expenditure. Benefit-generous countries have not only generous basic benefits but also a variable benefit system that takes into account different types of families and the variety of situations in which it is desirable to support families with children financially. The role of benefits in meeting two selected family policy objectives – promoting fertility and eliminating child poverty - is not clear from the comparisons made. Both fertility and child poverty indicators are most favourable in countries that have a comprehensive approach to family policy and a mix of direct and indirect instruments. The analysis confirms the need for systemic integration of cash benefits with other family policy measures if the benefit system is to fulfil its role.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较选定的欧洲国家对家庭的财政支持制度,重点是现金福利
财政支助措施在今天的家庭政策中仍然具有中心作用,在越来越多的家庭受到更困难的经济条件影响的时候,这种政策越来越重要。本文的目的是在家庭政策模式的背景下比较各国的家庭福利制度。目前,国家模式更多地是经典“理想类型”的混合,或多或少地占原始特征的主导地位,福利制度在设置细节、慷慨程度和目标以及财政支持形式的结构方面存在差异。在接受调查的半数国家中,现金福利是家庭总体财政支助的关键组成部分。在瑞典和西班牙,支助家庭服务是总支出的主要来源。慷慨提供福利的国家不仅有慷慨的基本福利,而且还有可变的福利制度,该制度考虑到不同类型的家庭和需要在经济上支助有子女的家庭的各种情况。从所作的比较来看,福利在实现两个选定的家庭政策目标- -促进生育率和消除儿童贫穷- -方面的作用并不清楚。生育率和儿童贫穷指数在对家庭政策采取综合办法并混合使用直接和间接手段的国家最为有利。分析证实,如果福利制度要发挥其作用,就需要有系统地将现金福利与其他家庭政策措施结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE IMPACT OF THE PANDEMIC ON CITIZENS IN LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF SOCIAL SERVICES IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC OPTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE PAYMENT OF ONE-OFF SOCIAL BENEFITS TO HOUSEHOLDS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN RESPONSE TO HIGH INFLATION CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION AND PARTNERSHIPS OF CITIES AND MUNICIPALITIES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE INVISIBLE BORDER IN THE SCOPE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC   DEVELOPMENT OF THE NUMBER OF BENEFICIARIES OF CARE ALLOWANCE IN THE YEARS 2007-2021 POSITION OF CITY DISTRICTS IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC AND CZECH REPUBLIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1