Correlational Analysis on Stem Students’ Ncae Scholastic Aptitude, Track Preference, and Occupational Interest, with SHS Academic Performance

Herman M Lagon
{"title":"Correlational Analysis on Stem Students’ Ncae Scholastic Aptitude, Track Preference, and Occupational Interest, with SHS Academic Performance","authors":"Herman M Lagon","doi":"10.54536/ajet.v1i4.674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the “new normal,” a non-paper-and-pencil admission process becomes a challenge. This correlational analysis aims to choose possible admission candidates for SHS STEM strand by determining possible connections between the NCAE General Scholastic Aptitude (GSA), STEM Strand Preference (SSP), and Area of Occupational Interest (AOI), with the academic performance (AP) of STEM students of Ateneo de Iloilo (ADI) Senior High School (SHS). The study covered 124 STEM students data protection protocols. It showed that Ateneans have Proficient (85.6%; SD=3.13) AP and Above Average NCAE GSA (school: 93.95%; national: 37.87%) and SSP rating (90.92%). There is also a significant difference in the GWA if classified according to GSA (p=0.00), SSP (p=0.00), and AOI (p=0.031). There is a strong positive correlation (r=0.646, p=0.00) in the students’ GWA and GSA. The same was likewise observed in students’ Grade 11 performance (except PE) and their corresponding GSA areas: scientific ability, reading comprehension, verbal ability, mathematical ability, and logical reasoning ability. The study suggested that the direct relationship between NCAE and Grade 11 AP validates the efficacy of the NCAE instrument as guide in career/strand advising and in approximating students’ potential AP in Grade 11.","PeriodicalId":204039,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education and Technology","volume":"20 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i4.674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the “new normal,” a non-paper-and-pencil admission process becomes a challenge. This correlational analysis aims to choose possible admission candidates for SHS STEM strand by determining possible connections between the NCAE General Scholastic Aptitude (GSA), STEM Strand Preference (SSP), and Area of Occupational Interest (AOI), with the academic performance (AP) of STEM students of Ateneo de Iloilo (ADI) Senior High School (SHS). The study covered 124 STEM students data protection protocols. It showed that Ateneans have Proficient (85.6%; SD=3.13) AP and Above Average NCAE GSA (school: 93.95%; national: 37.87%) and SSP rating (90.92%). There is also a significant difference in the GWA if classified according to GSA (p=0.00), SSP (p=0.00), and AOI (p=0.031). There is a strong positive correlation (r=0.646, p=0.00) in the students’ GWA and GSA. The same was likewise observed in students’ Grade 11 performance (except PE) and their corresponding GSA areas: scientific ability, reading comprehension, verbal ability, mathematical ability, and logical reasoning ability. The study suggested that the direct relationship between NCAE and Grade 11 AP validates the efficacy of the NCAE instrument as guide in career/strand advising and in approximating students’ potential AP in Grade 11.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stem学生Ncae学业能力、专业偏好、职业兴趣与SHS学业成绩的相关分析
在“新常态”下,非纸笔入学程序成为一项挑战。本相关分析旨在通过确定NCAE一般学术能力(GSA)、STEM学科偏好(SSP)和职业兴趣领域(AOI)与Ateneo de Iloilo (ADI)高中(SHS) STEM学生的学习成绩(AP)之间的可能联系,选择SHS STEM学科链的可能入学候选人。该研究涵盖了124名STEM学生的数据保护协议。结果显示,雅典人精通英语(85.6%;AP及以上平均NCAE GSA(学校:93.95%;全国:37.87%)和SSP收视率(90.92%)。按GSA (p=0.00)、SSP (p=0.00)和AOI (p=0.031)分类的GWA也有显著差异。学生的GWA与GSA呈显著正相关(r=0.646, p=0.00)。11年级学生的成绩(体育除外)及其相应的GSA领域:科学能力、阅读理解能力、语言能力、数学能力和逻辑推理能力也出现了同样的情况。研究表明,NCAE与11年级AP之间的直接关系验证了NCAE工具在职业/专业建议和近似11年级学生潜在AP方面的指导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Resource Management: Examining MOOE Allocation Utilization for Annual Improvement Plan (AIP) Understanding Teacher Experiences Amidst Principal Reshuffling: A Phenomenological Inquiry Investigating the Impact of Information Communication Technology (ICT) Illiteracy Levels on the Academic Performance of First-Year Students: A Case of Emmanuel University Level of Collaboration among Stakeholders to Promote Inclusive Education in Schools: The Case of Lilongwe Rural East and Mthandiza Zone in Dedza Designing and Evaluating an Outcome-Based Education Model: A Case Study at Angeli Gilbert Christian Academy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1