An analysis of the Ariane 5 flight 501 failure-a system engineering perspective

G. Le Lann
{"title":"An analysis of the Ariane 5 flight 501 failure-a system engineering perspective","authors":"G. Le Lann","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.1997.581900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The report issued by the Inquiry Board in charge of inspecting the Ariane 5 flight 501 failure concludes that causes of the failure are rooted in poor S/W Engineering practice. From the failure scenario described in the Inquiry Board report, it is possible to infer what, in our view, are the real causes of the 501 failure. We develop arguments to demonstrate that the real causes of the 501 failure are neither S/W specification errors nor S/W design errors. Real causes of the failure are faults in the capture of the overall Ariane 5 application/environment requirements, and faults in the design and the dimensioning of the Ariane 5 on-board computing system. These faults result from not following a rigorous system engineering approach, such as applying a proof-based System Engineering method. A definition of proof-based System Engineering for Computing Systems is also presented.","PeriodicalId":240356,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","volume":"29 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.1997.581900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The report issued by the Inquiry Board in charge of inspecting the Ariane 5 flight 501 failure concludes that causes of the failure are rooted in poor S/W Engineering practice. From the failure scenario described in the Inquiry Board report, it is possible to infer what, in our view, are the real causes of the 501 failure. We develop arguments to demonstrate that the real causes of the 501 failure are neither S/W specification errors nor S/W design errors. Real causes of the failure are faults in the capture of the overall Ariane 5 application/environment requirements, and faults in the design and the dimensioning of the Ariane 5 on-board computing system. These faults result from not following a rigorous system engineering approach, such as applying a proof-based System Engineering method. A definition of proof-based System Engineering for Computing Systems is also presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从系统工程的角度分析阿丽亚娜5号501航班的故障
负责调查阿丽亚娜5号501航班故障的调查委员会发布的报告得出结论,故障的根源是糟糕的S/W工程实践。从调查委员会报告中描述的故障场景中,可以推断出我们认为501故障的真正原因是什么。我们提出论证,证明501故障的真正原因既不是S/W规格错误,也不是S/W设计错误。失败的真正原因是对阿丽亚娜5的整体应用/环境要求的捕捉错误,以及阿丽亚娜5机载计算系统的设计和尺寸错误。这些错误是由于没有遵循严格的系统工程方法,例如应用基于证明的系统工程方法。给出了基于证明的计算系统工程的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An improved system engineering model The insides and outsides of computer-based system complexity Concepts for computer assisted engineering process management Complex systems Model driven development: integrating tools with practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1