GeoGebra integration and effectiveness in the teaching and learning of mathematics in secondary schools: A review of literature

Marie Sagesse Uwurukundo, Jean François Maniraho, Michael Tusiime
{"title":"GeoGebra integration and effectiveness in the teaching and learning of mathematics in secondary schools: A review of literature","authors":"Marie Sagesse Uwurukundo, Jean François Maniraho, Michael Tusiime","doi":"10.4314/AJESMS.V16I1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores studies that investigated GeoGebra integration and its effectiveness in teaching and learning mathematics. The study examines existing studies on how and why GeoGebra enhanced students’ performance; understanding, analytical thinking, generalization, abstract thinking, representation, and logical thinking. By a deep exploration of the main construct of the study, we collected and analyzed 20 studies whose results reported that GeoGebra added values when applied in teaching and learning in different mathematical domains. The reviewed literature identified four domains in Mathematics: Geometry, Algebra, Calculus, and Trigonometry that was studied. The majority of the reviewed studies investigated the integration of GeoGebra in Geometry and few studies were found in other mathematical domains. The literature ascertains that students can explore independently the software and acquire mathematical concepts with minimum assistance from the teacher. The results from the reviewed literature, on the one hand, indicated 16/20 or (80 %) of the studies generally showed that GeoGebra is effective in teaching and learning Mathematics since GeoGebra contributed in enhancing students’ understanding of mathematical concepts and improved students’ interest to learn mathematics. On the other hand, only 4/20 studies or (20%) showed non-effectiveness of GeoGebra since students in both experimental and control groups did not show the difference in their performance after being both given post-tests or an interview. This may indicate that although GeoGebra seems to be largely effective, such effectiveness is dependent on the way it is integrated into the teaching and learning process. Therefore, we recommend that other research should step up investigating why most of the studies were found in the Geometry domain and few in other domains.","PeriodicalId":210929,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJESMS.V16I1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This article explores studies that investigated GeoGebra integration and its effectiveness in teaching and learning mathematics. The study examines existing studies on how and why GeoGebra enhanced students’ performance; understanding, analytical thinking, generalization, abstract thinking, representation, and logical thinking. By a deep exploration of the main construct of the study, we collected and analyzed 20 studies whose results reported that GeoGebra added values when applied in teaching and learning in different mathematical domains. The reviewed literature identified four domains in Mathematics: Geometry, Algebra, Calculus, and Trigonometry that was studied. The majority of the reviewed studies investigated the integration of GeoGebra in Geometry and few studies were found in other mathematical domains. The literature ascertains that students can explore independently the software and acquire mathematical concepts with minimum assistance from the teacher. The results from the reviewed literature, on the one hand, indicated 16/20 or (80 %) of the studies generally showed that GeoGebra is effective in teaching and learning Mathematics since GeoGebra contributed in enhancing students’ understanding of mathematical concepts and improved students’ interest to learn mathematics. On the other hand, only 4/20 studies or (20%) showed non-effectiveness of GeoGebra since students in both experimental and control groups did not show the difference in their performance after being both given post-tests or an interview. This may indicate that although GeoGebra seems to be largely effective, such effectiveness is dependent on the way it is integrated into the teaching and learning process. Therefore, we recommend that other research should step up investigating why most of the studies were found in the Geometry domain and few in other domains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GeoGebra整合与中学数学教与学的有效性:文献综述
本文探讨了GeoGebra整合及其在数学教与学中的有效性的研究。该研究考察了关于GeoGebra如何以及为什么提高学生成绩的现有研究;理解,分析思维,概括,抽象思维,表达和逻辑思维。通过对研究主体结构的深入探索,我们收集并分析了20项研究结果,这些研究报告了GeoGebra在不同数学领域的教学和学习中应用的附加值。回顾文献确定了数学的四个领域:几何、代数、微积分和三角学。所回顾的研究大多是关于几何中GeoGebra的整合,而在其他数学领域的研究很少。文献表明,学生可以独立探索软件,并在老师的帮助下获得数学概念。从文献综述的结果来看,一方面,16/20或80%的研究普遍认为GeoGebra在数学教学中是有效的,因为GeoGebra有助于增强学生对数学概念的理解,提高学生学习数学的兴趣。另一方面,只有4/20的研究或(20%)显示GeoGebra无效,因为实验组和对照组的学生在接受后测或面试后的表现都没有表现出差异。这可能表明,尽管GeoGebra似乎在很大程度上是有效的,但这种有效性取决于它融入教学过程的方式。因此,我们建议其他研究应该加紧调查为什么大多数研究发现在几何领域,而在其他领域很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The interplay between Teachers’ Efficacy, Effectiveness, Attitudes and Students' Academic Achievement in Biology The pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of nursery school teachers in teaching and learning of geometry: A review of literature Teacher Trainees’ Experiences and Challenges in Project Work at Colleges of Education in Ghana: The Case of a College in Southern Ghana Students' alternative conceptions in quantum mechanics: The case of one-dimensional potential quantum tunneling Access, successful completion and learning achievement of female undergraduate students studying mathematics at the University of Education, Winneba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1