COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT OF ABBREVIATED BURN SEVERITY INDEX (ABSI) AND BELGIAN OUTCOME OF BURN INJURY (BOBI) AT H. ADAM MALIK GENERAL HOSPITAL

Rifwanul Basir Nasution
{"title":"COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT OF ABBREVIATED BURN SEVERITY INDEX (ABSI) AND BELGIAN OUTCOME OF BURN INJURY (BOBI) AT H. ADAM MALIK GENERAL HOSPITAL","authors":"Rifwanul Basir Nasution","doi":"10.32734/sumej.v5i2.8966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Assessment of length of stay and mortality in patients with burn injuries is essential to support clinicians in making clinical decisions. In Indonesia, there are several scoring systems used by hospital centers to assess the mortality of burn patients, such as the Belgian Outcome of Burn Injury (BOBI) and the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI). However, different results were obtained in studies that examined the comparison of the results of the scoring system. \nMethod: The type of research used in this research is unpaired comparative analysis research using a cross-sectional design. The data to be used is secondary data taken from medical records. \nResults: Respondents with death status were found in the serious, severe, and maximum ABSI categories, p=0.001 (p<0.05) and the BOBI 50% category as many as three people and 85% as many as one person, p=0.0001 (0<0.05). Length of stay based on the ABSI score for the length of stay was 23 days with an ABSI score of 12-13 (maximum), and based on the BOBI Score, the majority was 28 days with a BOBI score of 8 (85%). ABSI in this study had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 86.4%, while the use of BOBI in this study had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 88.1%. \nDiscussion: The BOBI scoring system is more accurate than the ABSI. This difference may occur due to differences in demographics and quality of service in each region. Therefore, the analysis of the validity of the scoring model before the research is carried out in a new population is considered crucial to be carried out.","PeriodicalId":184699,"journal":{"name":"Sumatera Medical Journal","volume":"11 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sumatera Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32734/sumej.v5i2.8966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessment of length of stay and mortality in patients with burn injuries is essential to support clinicians in making clinical decisions. In Indonesia, there are several scoring systems used by hospital centers to assess the mortality of burn patients, such as the Belgian Outcome of Burn Injury (BOBI) and the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI). However, different results were obtained in studies that examined the comparison of the results of the scoring system. Method: The type of research used in this research is unpaired comparative analysis research using a cross-sectional design. The data to be used is secondary data taken from medical records. Results: Respondents with death status were found in the serious, severe, and maximum ABSI categories, p=0.001 (p<0.05) and the BOBI 50% category as many as three people and 85% as many as one person, p=0.0001 (0<0.05). Length of stay based on the ABSI score for the length of stay was 23 days with an ABSI score of 12-13 (maximum), and based on the BOBI Score, the majority was 28 days with a BOBI score of 8 (85%). ABSI in this study had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 86.4%, while the use of BOBI in this study had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 88.1%. Discussion: The BOBI scoring system is more accurate than the ABSI. This difference may occur due to differences in demographics and quality of service in each region. Therefore, the analysis of the validity of the scoring model before the research is carried out in a new population is considered crucial to be carried out.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚当马利克总医院烧伤严重程度指数(absi)与比利时烧伤预后(bobi)评定的比较
背景:评估烧伤患者的住院时间和死亡率对于支持临床医生做出临床决策至关重要。在印度尼西亚,医院中心使用了几种评分系统来评估烧伤患者的死亡率,例如比利时烧伤结局(BOBI)和简略烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)。然而,在检查评分系统结果比较的研究中获得了不同的结果。方法:本研究采用的研究类型是采用横断面设计的非配对比较分析研究。使用的数据是从医疗记录中获取的辅助数据。结果:重度、重度和最大ABSI类别均有死亡状态的应答者,p=0.001 (p<0.05); BOBI 50%类别最多3人,85%最多1人,p=0.0001(0<0.05)。基于ABSI评分的停留时间为23天,ABSI评分为12-13分(最大值);基于BOBI评分,大多数为28天,BOBI评分为8分(85%)。本研究中使用ABSI的敏感性为100%,特异性为86.4%,而使用BOBI的敏感性为100%,特异性为88.1%。讨论:BOBI评分系统比ABSI更准确。这种差异可能是由于每个地区的人口统计和服务质量的差异造成的。因此,在新的人群中进行研究之前,对评分模型的有效性进行分析是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on Impact of Covid-19 on Job Performance & Job Satisfaction of Employees Engaged in WFH Culture Cerebral Toxoplasmosis and Latent Tuberculosis Infection in HIV Infected Patient Glucose to Complications: Understanding Secondary Effects in Diabetes Mellitus Unraveling the Complexities of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review A Natural Food Colourant from Dioscorea alata (Dandila) in Sri Lanka: Development, Storage Stability and Bio-active Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1