Conceptualising public sector innovation: Introducing the lens of the epistemological, pragmatic and normative dimensions

Luise Li Langergaard
{"title":"Conceptualising public sector innovation: Introducing the lens of the epistemological, pragmatic and normative dimensions","authors":"Luise Li Langergaard","doi":"10.7577/njsr.3684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation is a relatively new concept in the public sector, and there is currently no broad agreement regarding how to understand and conceptualise it. This article assumes that a central role for research is to critically scrutinise and discuss what research does—or could do—when applying the concept of public sector innovation, especially because innovation has become a powerful organising metaphor for policy and practice. The article initiates a meta-conceptual inquiry and discussion of public sector innovation as a research concept, suggesting a method of conceptual clarification for future research by breaking the concept down into different dimensions. Methodologically, the article conducts a meta-conceptual analysis and inquiry into research positions and discussions in public sector innovation, thus reflecting the academic activity/enterprise of conceptualising. By discussing selected literature from the public sector innovation field, three conceptual dimensions emerge: epistemological, pragmatic and normative dimensions. These dimensions refer to questions about what kind of knowledge the concept of public sector innovation represents, what its pragmatic or practical implications are and which normative or value dimensions the concept implies. Finally, the concluding discussion highlights questions for research(ers) to address in future reflections on the conceptualisation of public sector innovation.","PeriodicalId":207067,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.3684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovation is a relatively new concept in the public sector, and there is currently no broad agreement regarding how to understand and conceptualise it. This article assumes that a central role for research is to critically scrutinise and discuss what research does—or could do—when applying the concept of public sector innovation, especially because innovation has become a powerful organising metaphor for policy and practice. The article initiates a meta-conceptual inquiry and discussion of public sector innovation as a research concept, suggesting a method of conceptual clarification for future research by breaking the concept down into different dimensions. Methodologically, the article conducts a meta-conceptual analysis and inquiry into research positions and discussions in public sector innovation, thus reflecting the academic activity/enterprise of conceptualising. By discussing selected literature from the public sector innovation field, three conceptual dimensions emerge: epistemological, pragmatic and normative dimensions. These dimensions refer to questions about what kind of knowledge the concept of public sector innovation represents, what its pragmatic or practical implications are and which normative or value dimensions the concept implies. Finally, the concluding discussion highlights questions for research(ers) to address in future reflections on the conceptualisation of public sector innovation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念化公共部门创新:引入认识论、实用主义和规范维度的镜头
创新在公共部门是一个相对较新的概念,目前对于如何理解和概念化创新还没有广泛的共识。本文假设研究的核心作用是在应用公共部门创新的概念时,批判性地审查和讨论研究做了什么或可以做什么,特别是因为创新已经成为政策和实践的强大组织隐喻。本文对公共部门创新作为一个研究概念进行了元概念的探究和讨论,提出了一种将公共部门创新概念分解为不同维度的概念澄清方法。在方法上,本文对公共部门创新的研究现状和讨论进行了元概念分析和探究,从而反映了概念化的学术活动/企业。通过讨论公共部门创新领域选定的文献,出现了三个概念维度:认识论、实用主义和规范维度。这些维度涉及公共部门创新的概念代表了什么样的知识,它的实用或实际含义是什么,以及这个概念意味着哪些规范或价值维度。最后,结论性讨论强调了研究人员在未来对公共部门创新概念化的思考中需要解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disembodied care: Articulations of care in municipal policy regarding welfare technologies in eldercare Disembodied care: Articulations of care in municipal policy regarding welfare technologies in eldercare Economic composition and income volatility of Norwegian low-income families – a mixed method study of its implications How children’s navigation on digital platforms challenges child welfare assessments The complexity of multiple trauma understandings across disciplines – the COVID-19 pandemic as a ‘case’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1