Automated Computational Diagnosis of Peripheral Retinal Pathology in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Scans using Graph Theory

T. Lange, Stewart R. Lake, Karen Reynolds, M. Bottema
{"title":"Automated Computational Diagnosis of Peripheral Retinal Pathology in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Scans using Graph Theory","authors":"T. Lange, Stewart R. Lake, Karen Reynolds, M. Bottema","doi":"10.1109/DICTA51227.2020.9363376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of retinal shape with optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been valuable in describing different ophthalmic conditions. An effective method for retinal contour delineation is graph theory. This study compares the ability of two different implementations of graph theory, the Livewire (LVW) intelligent scissors developed for ImageJ and a purpose-built graph searching function (GSF), to determine retinal shape for a retinal disease classifier. Both methods require user interaction. Retinal shape features derived from both methods were used to diagnose eyes with posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) or retinal detachment (RD) via quadratic discriminant analysis. Classification with each method was the same in 49 out of 51 eyes. Processing time was faster with the GSF than LVW. In mean (µ) ± standard deviation (SD), GSF took 524 ± 62 s and LVW took 814 ± 223 s (p = 5.52 x 10−14). Conclusively, GSF was easier to use and is preferred for further retinal shape analysis.","PeriodicalId":348164,"journal":{"name":"2020 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA51227.2020.9363376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Analysis of retinal shape with optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been valuable in describing different ophthalmic conditions. An effective method for retinal contour delineation is graph theory. This study compares the ability of two different implementations of graph theory, the Livewire (LVW) intelligent scissors developed for ImageJ and a purpose-built graph searching function (GSF), to determine retinal shape for a retinal disease classifier. Both methods require user interaction. Retinal shape features derived from both methods were used to diagnose eyes with posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) or retinal detachment (RD) via quadratic discriminant analysis. Classification with each method was the same in 49 out of 51 eyes. Processing time was faster with the GSF than LVW. In mean (µ) ± standard deviation (SD), GSF took 524 ± 62 s and LVW took 814 ± 223 s (p = 5.52 x 10−14). Conclusively, GSF was easier to use and is preferred for further retinal shape analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于图论的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)视网膜病理自动计算诊断
光学相干断层扫描(OCT)对视网膜形状的分析在描述不同的眼科疾病方面是有价值的。图论是一种有效的视网膜轮廓描绘方法。本研究比较了两种不同图论实现的能力,即为ImageJ开发的Livewire (LVW)智能剪刀和专门构建的图搜索功能(GSF),以确定视网膜疾病分类器的视网膜形状。这两种方法都需要用户交互。通过二次判别分析,将两种方法得到的视网膜形状特征用于诊断玻璃体后脱离(PVD)或视网膜脱离(RD)。每种方法的分类在51只眼睛中的49只是相同的。GSF的处理时间比LVW快。平均(µ)±标准差(SD), GSF为524±62 s, LVW为814±223 s (p = 5.52 × 10−14)。总之,GSF更容易使用,是进一步分析视网膜形状的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pixel-RRT*: A Novel Skeleton Trajectory Search Algorithm for Hepatic Vessels M2-Net: A Multi-scale Multi-level Feature Enhanced Network for Object Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images Using Environmental Context to Synthesis Missing Pixels Automatic Assessment of Open Street Maps Database Quality using Aerial Imagery Temporal 3D RetinaNet for fish detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1