The use of ketorolac as an adjuvant in the superficial cervical plexus block

Fouad Soliman, A. Hassan, M. Mahmoud, B. Refaie
{"title":"The use of ketorolac as an adjuvant in the superficial cervical plexus block","authors":"Fouad Soliman, A. Hassan, M. Mahmoud, B. Refaie","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_57_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Thyroidectomy operation is considered a common operation done nowadays. Pain after thyroidectomy is moderate to severe in some patients. Many techniques are used to provide analgesia and to avoid opioid adverse effects such as local wound infiltration, and regional anesthesia techniques like bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB), alone or in combination with deep cervical plexus block. Patients and methods In this prospective, randomized, and double‑blind study, 46 patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (23 in each group): the bupivacaine group (group B) received BSCPB with 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 ml normal saline on each side and the bupivacaine ketorolac group (group BK) received 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 ml ketorolac (15 mg) on each side. The first-time supplemental analgesia needed postoperatively was our primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include total analgesic consumption, visual analog score, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results visual analog score at 8, 16, and 24 h and total ketorolac requirements were significantly lower (P=0.001 and 0.02, respectively), whereas the time to first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly longer in group BK when compared with group B (P=0.001). The frequency of nausea and vomiting was not statistically significant with less incidence in group BK compared with group B. Throat pain frequency was significantly less in group BK (P=0.05). Patient satisfaction was statistically significant in group BK (P=0.03). Conclusion Adding ketorolac to bupivacaine in BSCPB improved the control of pain, increased the pain-free period, decreased postoperative analgesic needs, and decreased adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_57_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Thyroidectomy operation is considered a common operation done nowadays. Pain after thyroidectomy is moderate to severe in some patients. Many techniques are used to provide analgesia and to avoid opioid adverse effects such as local wound infiltration, and regional anesthesia techniques like bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB), alone or in combination with deep cervical plexus block. Patients and methods In this prospective, randomized, and double‑blind study, 46 patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (23 in each group): the bupivacaine group (group B) received BSCPB with 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 ml normal saline on each side and the bupivacaine ketorolac group (group BK) received 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 ml ketorolac (15 mg) on each side. The first-time supplemental analgesia needed postoperatively was our primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include total analgesic consumption, visual analog score, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results visual analog score at 8, 16, and 24 h and total ketorolac requirements were significantly lower (P=0.001 and 0.02, respectively), whereas the time to first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly longer in group BK when compared with group B (P=0.001). The frequency of nausea and vomiting was not statistically significant with less incidence in group BK compared with group B. Throat pain frequency was significantly less in group BK (P=0.05). Patient satisfaction was statistically significant in group BK (P=0.03). Conclusion Adding ketorolac to bupivacaine in BSCPB improved the control of pain, increased the pain-free period, decreased postoperative analgesic needs, and decreased adverse effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酮罗拉酸在颈浅丛阻滞中的辅助应用
背景甲状腺切除术是当今常见的手术方式。部分患者甲状腺切除术后疼痛为中度至重度。许多技术用于提供镇痛和避免阿片类药物的不良反应,如局部伤口浸润,以及区域麻醉技术,如双侧颈浅丛阻滞(BSCPB),单独或联合颈深丛阻滞。在这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中,46例患者被随机分为两组(每组23例):布比卡因组(B组)接受BSCPB治疗,每侧10ml 0.25%布比卡因和1ml生理盐水;布比卡因酮洛拉克组(BK组)每侧10ml 0.25%布比卡因和1ml酮洛拉克(15mg)。术后首次补充镇痛是我们的主要结果。次要结局包括总镇痛用量、视觉模拟评分、患者满意度和不良反应。结果BK组8、16、24 h的视觉模拟评分和总酮洛酸需用量均显著低于B组(P=0.001和0.02),而首次救援镇痛所需时间明显长于B组(P=0.001)。恶心呕吐频次差异无统计学意义,BK组咽喉痛频次较b组明显减少(P=0.05)。BK组患者满意度差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。结论在布比卡因中加入酮咯酸能改善BSCPB患者对疼痛的控制,延长无痛期,减少术后镇痛需求,减少不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1