A cross-comparison between TCP and AQM algorithms: Which is the best couple for congestion control?

Carlo Augusto Grazia, Natale Patriciello, Martin Klapež, M. Casoni
{"title":"A cross-comparison between TCP and AQM algorithms: Which is the best couple for congestion control?","authors":"Carlo Augusto Grazia, Natale Patriciello, Martin Klapež, M. Casoni","doi":"10.23919/ConTEL.2017.8000042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current Internet traffic is carried mainly by the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), and the performance of the Internet depends strongly on how well TCP works. Detecting and mitigating the congestion is one of the main tasks of this protocol, in fact, different TCP versions are defined by their congestion control algorithm. Also, Active Queue Management (AQM) algorithms share the same goal of congestion mitigation with TCP, in particular, the most effective congestion control occurs when AQM and TCP work together. This paper presents a brief survey and a cross-comparison of the latest and most important TCP and AQM variants, then provides an evaluation of a different kind of performance (multiple Round-Trip Time, long delay, different congestion level, etc.) on the ns-3 network simulator over various types of environments. In a shared bottleneck, the choice of the TCP-AQM couple to adopt is crucial; we show that the results are not univocal, the “golden couple” depends on the performance that we want to boost and on the environment that we have to deal with.","PeriodicalId":410388,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL)","volume":"94 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ConTEL.2017.8000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Current Internet traffic is carried mainly by the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), and the performance of the Internet depends strongly on how well TCP works. Detecting and mitigating the congestion is one of the main tasks of this protocol, in fact, different TCP versions are defined by their congestion control algorithm. Also, Active Queue Management (AQM) algorithms share the same goal of congestion mitigation with TCP, in particular, the most effective congestion control occurs when AQM and TCP work together. This paper presents a brief survey and a cross-comparison of the latest and most important TCP and AQM variants, then provides an evaluation of a different kind of performance (multiple Round-Trip Time, long delay, different congestion level, etc.) on the ns-3 network simulator over various types of environments. In a shared bottleneck, the choice of the TCP-AQM couple to adopt is crucial; we show that the results are not univocal, the “golden couple” depends on the performance that we want to boost and on the environment that we have to deal with.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TCP和AQM算法之间的交叉比较:哪个是拥塞控制的最佳组合?
当前的互联网流量主要由传输控制协议(TCP)承载,而互联网的性能在很大程度上取决于TCP的工作情况。检测和缓解拥塞是该协议的主要任务之一,实际上,不同的TCP版本是由各自的拥塞控制算法定义的。此外,活动队列管理(AQM)算法与TCP具有相同的拥塞缓解目标,特别是当AQM和TCP协同工作时,可以实现最有效的拥塞控制。本文对最新和最重要的TCP和AQM变体进行了简要的调查和交叉比较,然后在ns-3网络模拟器上对不同类型环境下的不同性能(多往返时间,长延迟,不同拥塞级别等)进行了评估。在共享瓶颈中,采用TCP-AQM对的选择至关重要;我们发现结果并不是单一的,这对“黄金夫妇”取决于我们想要提升的表现和我们必须应对的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The future of optical interconnects for data centers: A review of technology trends Introducing a framework for reporting Behavioral Informatics interventions An approach to user interactions with IoT-enabled spaces Towards context classification and reasoning in IoT Real-time wireless UWB sensor network for person monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1