Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on Child Patients Who Received Circumcision

Gui-bing Chen
{"title":"Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on Child Patients Who Received Circumcision","authors":"Gui-bing Chen","doi":"10.11648/J.AJNS.20211001.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess effect of psychological nursing intervention on child patients who received circumcision. Methods: We collected 112 valid data from child patients (younger than 14 years old), the patients who received circumcision from April 2017 to October 2020. Base on the type of nursing intervention patients receive, the patients were assigned to two groups: Control group participants (n = 62) received common nursing intervention before circumcision, and intervention group participants (n = 50) received psychological nursing intervention before circumcision. After circumcision, we collected the data from medical records and questionnaire, the questionnaires included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: By comparing control group and intervention group, the patient characteristics were no significantly different in this study, including age, patient number who undergoing postoperative complications, operation time and anesthesia method (p > 0.05). Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants had better outcome in anxiety assessment and depression assessment, and their results were significantly different after carry out nursing intervention (p < 0.05). Compared with the participants who received common nursing and their family, the participants who received psychological nursing intervention and their family had higher satisfaction rate after circumcision (67.13% vs 92.54% and 65.34% vs 95.15%). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention improve mental health of child patients who received circumcision, that it had better effect compare with common nursing intervention.","PeriodicalId":344042,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"7 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJNS.20211001.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess effect of psychological nursing intervention on child patients who received circumcision. Methods: We collected 112 valid data from child patients (younger than 14 years old), the patients who received circumcision from April 2017 to October 2020. Base on the type of nursing intervention patients receive, the patients were assigned to two groups: Control group participants (n = 62) received common nursing intervention before circumcision, and intervention group participants (n = 50) received psychological nursing intervention before circumcision. After circumcision, we collected the data from medical records and questionnaire, the questionnaires included Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and satisfaction assessment questionnaire. Result: By comparing control group and intervention group, the patient characteristics were no significantly different in this study, including age, patient number who undergoing postoperative complications, operation time and anesthesia method (p > 0.05). Compared with control group participants, intervention group participants had better outcome in anxiety assessment and depression assessment, and their results were significantly different after carry out nursing intervention (p < 0.05). Compared with the participants who received common nursing and their family, the participants who received psychological nursing intervention and their family had higher satisfaction rate after circumcision (67.13% vs 92.54% and 65.34% vs 95.15%). Conclusion: psychological nursing intervention improve mental health of child patients who received circumcision, that it had better effect compare with common nursing intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理护理干预对儿童包皮环切术患者的影响
目的:评价心理护理干预对儿童包皮环切术患者的影响。方法:收集2017年4月至2020年10月期间接受包皮环切术的儿童患者(14岁以下)112例有效数据。根据患者接受护理干预的类型,将患者分为两组:对照组(n = 62)在包皮环切前接受普通护理干预,干预组(n = 50)在包皮环切前接受心理护理干预。包皮环切术后,我们收集患者的病历资料和问卷,问卷包括焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和满意度评估问卷。结果:与对照组和干预组比较,本组患者年龄、出现术后并发症人数、手术时间、麻醉方式等特征无显著差异(p > 0.05)。干预组参与者在焦虑评估和抑郁评估上均优于对照组,且在实施护理干预后两组结果差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与接受普通护理的参与者及其家属相比,接受心理护理干预的参与者及其家属包皮环切术后满意度更高(67.13% vs 92.54%, 65.34% vs 95.15%)。结论:心理护理干预改善了包皮环切术患儿的心理健康状况,与普通护理干预相比效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges Experienced by Caregivers in Communicating with Children with Severe to Profound Intellectual Disabilities New Graduate Nurses Transition: Role of Lack of Experience and Knowledge as Challenging Factors Influence of Stress on Drug Abuse Among Prison Inmates: A Case of Kangeta Prison, Meru County, Kenya Influence of Stress on Drug Abuse Among Prison Inmates: A Case of Kangeta Prison, Meru County, Kenya Construction of Risk Prediction Model for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1