Multi agent trust for belief combination on the Semantic Web

M. Nagy, M. Vargas-Vera, E. Motta
{"title":"Multi agent trust for belief combination on the Semantic Web","authors":"M. Nagy, M. Vargas-Vera, E. Motta","doi":"10.1109/ICCP.2008.4648382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software agents that assess similarities between concepts on the semantic Web has to deal with scenarios where the beliefs in the assessed similarities becomes contradicting. The combination of these contradicting beliefs can easily worsen the mapping precision and recall, which leads to poor performance of any ontology mapping algorithm. Typically mapping algorithms, which use different similarities and combine them into a more reliable and coherent view can easily become unreliable when these contradictions are not managed effectively between the different sources. In this paper we propose a solution based on the fuzzy voting model for managing such situations by introducing trust and voting between software agents that resolve contradicting beliefs in the assessed similarities.","PeriodicalId":169031,"journal":{"name":"2008 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing","volume":"11 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCP.2008.4648382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Software agents that assess similarities between concepts on the semantic Web has to deal with scenarios where the beliefs in the assessed similarities becomes contradicting. The combination of these contradicting beliefs can easily worsen the mapping precision and recall, which leads to poor performance of any ontology mapping algorithm. Typically mapping algorithms, which use different similarities and combine them into a more reliable and coherent view can easily become unreliable when these contradictions are not managed effectively between the different sources. In this paper we propose a solution based on the fuzzy voting model for managing such situations by introducing trust and voting between software agents that resolve contradicting beliefs in the assessed similarities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语义Web上基于多主体信任的信念组合
评估语义Web上概念之间相似性的软件代理必须处理对评估的相似性的信念变得矛盾的场景。这些相互矛盾的信念的组合很容易导致映射精度和召回率下降,从而导致任何本体映射算法的性能都很差。通常,使用不同相似度并将它们组合成更可靠和连贯的视图的映射算法,在不同来源之间的这些矛盾没有得到有效管理时,很容易变得不可靠。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于模糊投票模型的解决方案,通过在软件代理之间引入信任和投票来解决评估相似度中的矛盾信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kidney CT image segmentation using multi-feature EM algorithm, based on Gabor filters Forward collision detection using a Stereo Vision System Establishing and fixing a freshness flaw in a key-distribution and Authentication Protocol Generating logic-based representations for programs Curb segments detection with temporal filtering for urban driving scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1