Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor in sepsis syndrome

IF 0.3 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.10.002
Hazem El-Akabawy , Mohamed Abo Hamela , Ayman Gaber , Ahmed Abozekry
{"title":"Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor in sepsis syndrome","authors":"Hazem El-Akabawy ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abo Hamela ,&nbsp;Ayman Gaber ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abozekry","doi":"10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels are increased in sepsis.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the prognostic value of the serum VEGF level in critically ill septic patients regarding the clinical course and final outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 40 critically ill septic patients were included in a prospective, randomized, single center study. All patients were subjected to the measurement of VEGF levels on admission day (VEGF1) and 48 hours later (VEGF2). CRP levels and Microalbuminuria levels were also measured on admission. APACHE IV and SOFA scores were calculated. Clinical outcome (duration of stay in the ICU, need for MV, need for inotropic/vasopressor support, need for hemodialysis, and survival) was recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In relation to healthy subjects, the mean VEGF 1&amp;2 levels were significantly higher in the septic patients (142<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->28.98 vs 750.5<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->380.34 and 802.07<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->292.65 ng/l; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001 and &lt;0.001 respectively). Septic patients who required MV, inotropic/vasopressor support and hemodialysis, and also those who died had significantly higher VEGF1 levels compared to those who didn’t require them (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002, 0.006, 0.008 and 0.001 respectively). VEGF2 level was significantly higher only in those who required inotropic/vasopressor support (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.024). VEGF1 and 2 levels were significantly positively correlated with CRP level, Albumin/Creatinine ratio and APACHE IV score. ROC analysis of the data indicated a sensitivity of 85.15% and a specificity of 92.3% when a VEGF 1 level of 410 ng/l was taken as a predictor of ICU mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The admission VEGF is a useful marker for the evaluation of septic patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31233,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 119-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.10.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730316300457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels are increased in sepsis.

Purpose

To investigate the prognostic value of the serum VEGF level in critically ill septic patients regarding the clinical course and final outcome.

Methods

A total of 40 critically ill septic patients were included in a prospective, randomized, single center study. All patients were subjected to the measurement of VEGF levels on admission day (VEGF1) and 48 hours later (VEGF2). CRP levels and Microalbuminuria levels were also measured on admission. APACHE IV and SOFA scores were calculated. Clinical outcome (duration of stay in the ICU, need for MV, need for inotropic/vasopressor support, need for hemodialysis, and survival) was recorded.

Results

In relation to healthy subjects, the mean VEGF 1&2 levels were significantly higher in the septic patients (142 + 28.98 vs 750.5 + 380.34 and 802.07 + 292.65 ng/l; p = 0.001 and <0.001 respectively). Septic patients who required MV, inotropic/vasopressor support and hemodialysis, and also those who died had significantly higher VEGF1 levels compared to those who didn’t require them (p = 0.002, 0.006, 0.008 and 0.001 respectively). VEGF2 level was significantly higher only in those who required inotropic/vasopressor support (p = 0.024). VEGF1 and 2 levels were significantly positively correlated with CRP level, Albumin/Creatinine ratio and APACHE IV score. ROC analysis of the data indicated a sensitivity of 85.15% and a specificity of 92.3% when a VEGF 1 level of 410 ng/l was taken as a predictor of ICU mortality.

Conclusion

The admission VEGF is a useful marker for the evaluation of septic patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管内皮生长因子在脓毒症中的预后价值
背景:脓毒症患者血清血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平升高。目的探讨血清VEGF水平对脓毒症危重患者临床病程及预后的预测价值。方法采用前瞻性、随机、单中心研究方法,对40例危重症脓毒症患者进行分析。所有患者均在入院当天(VEGF1)和48小时后(VEGF2)测量VEGF水平。入院时也测量了CRP水平和微量白蛋白尿水平。计算APACHE IV和SOFA评分。记录临床结果(ICU住院时间、MV需求、肌力/血管加压剂支持需求、血液透析需求和生存)。结果与健康人相比,脓毒症患者血管内皮生长因子1和2的平均水平明显升高(142 + 28.98 vs 750.5 + 380.34和802.07 + 292.65 ng/l);P = 0.001和<0.001)。需要MV、肌力/血管加压支持和血液透析的脓毒症患者以及死亡患者的VEGF1水平明显高于不需要这些支持的患者(p分别= 0.002、0.006、0.008和0.001)。VEGF2水平仅在需要肌力/血管加压剂支持的患者中显著升高(p = 0.024)。VEGF1、2水平与CRP水平、白蛋白/肌酐比值、APACHE IV评分呈显著正相关。数据的ROC分析显示,当以410 ng/l的VEGF 1水平作为ICU死亡率的预测指标时,敏感性为85.15%,特异性为92.3%。结论入院时血管内皮生长因子是评估脓毒症患者病情的有效指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine is the official Journal of the Egyptian College of Critical Care Physicians, the most authoritative organization of Egyptian physicians involved in the multi-professional field of critical care medicine. The journal is intended to provide a peer-reviewed source for multidisciplinary coverage of general acute and intensive care medicine and its various subcategories including cardiac, pulmonary, neuro, renal as well as post-operative care. The journal is proud to have an international multi-professional editorial board in the broad field of critical care that will assist in publishing promising research and breakthrough reports that lead to better patients care in life threatening conditions, and bring the reader a quick access to the latest diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in monitoring and management of critically ill patients.
期刊最新文献
Choosing Between Enoxaparin and Fondaparinux for the Prevention of Thromboembolism: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Multiple Rib Fractures Management in a Tertiary Trauma Center: A Retrospective Observational Study Anterior Abdominal Wall Ecchymosis in COVID-19 Patient Following Enoxaparin Use Diaphragmatic Function Assessment Using Chest Ultrasonography as a Predictor for Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation Anaerobic Metabolism Markers as a Guide of Resuscitation Effort and Mortality Benefit in Septic Shock Among Egyptian Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1