Information Processing Skills of Short Sellers: Empirical Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Levy Schattmann, Jan-Oliver Strych, P. Westerholm
{"title":"Information Processing Skills of Short Sellers: Empirical Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Levy Schattmann, Jan-Oliver Strych, P. Westerholm","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3763198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aim to answer if superior performance by short sellers’ is generated by processing public information rather than by exploiting private information. To achieve this, we analyze if short sellers with healthcare expertise outperform in short selling of non-healthcare stocks compared to those with no healthcare expertise. Since we expect that any short sellers’ private information about healthcare stocks is unlikely to be material for non-healthcare stocks, we conclude that any observed outperformance in non-healthcare stocks is more likely caused by processing public information. As an identification strategy, we interpret the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic as a treatment to short sellers with healthcare expertise. Our measures of healthcare expertise are based on pre-COVID-19 performance related to either holding or covering a short position in healthcare stocks. Using a unique German sample of daily short selling data, we find that treated short positions identified by general shorting (covering) outperformance are associated with lower 10-day CARs for non-healthcare stocks by an economically significant magnitude of 4.3 percent (7.2 percent). Robustness test rule out that our results are also driven by the use of private information or non information-based trading advantages such as better funding or borrowing ability of observed short sellers.","PeriodicalId":375725,"journal":{"name":"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)","volume":"6 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3763198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aim to answer if superior performance by short sellers’ is generated by processing public information rather than by exploiting private information. To achieve this, we analyze if short sellers with healthcare expertise outperform in short selling of non-healthcare stocks compared to those with no healthcare expertise. Since we expect that any short sellers’ private information about healthcare stocks is unlikely to be material for non-healthcare stocks, we conclude that any observed outperformance in non-healthcare stocks is more likely caused by processing public information. As an identification strategy, we interpret the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic as a treatment to short sellers with healthcare expertise. Our measures of healthcare expertise are based on pre-COVID-19 performance related to either holding or covering a short position in healthcare stocks. Using a unique German sample of daily short selling data, we find that treated short positions identified by general shorting (covering) outperformance are associated with lower 10-day CARs for non-healthcare stocks by an economically significant magnitude of 4.3 percent (7.2 percent). Robustness test rule out that our results are also driven by the use of private information or non information-based trading advantages such as better funding or borrowing ability of observed short sellers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卖空者信息处理能力:来自新冠肺炎疫情的经验证据
我们的目标是回答卖空者的卓越业绩是否通过处理公共信息而不是利用私人信息产生的。为了实现这一目标,我们分析了具有医疗保健专业知识的卖空者在卖空非医疗保健股票时是否比没有医疗保健专业知识的卖空者表现更好。由于我们预计任何卖空者关于医疗保健股的私人信息不太可能对非医疗保健股产生重大影响,因此我们得出结论,任何观察到的非医疗保健股的优异表现更有可能是由处理公开信息引起的。作为一种识别策略,我们将COVID-19大流行的爆发解释为对具有医疗保健专业知识的卖空者的治疗。我们对医疗保健专业知识的衡量是基于covid -19之前与持有或回补医疗保健股空头头寸相关的表现。使用独特的德国每日卖空数据样本,我们发现,通过一般做空(回补)表现优异而确定的经过处理的空头头寸与非医疗保健股的10天car值较低相关,其经济显著程度为4.3%(7.2%)。稳健性测试排除了我们的结果也是由使用私人信息或非基于信息的交易优势驱动的,例如观察到的卖空者更好的融资或借贷能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Is a CCP Failure Very Unlikely? Does Shareholder Litigation Risk Cause Public Firms to Delist? Evidence From Securities Class Action Lawsuits How Do Institutional Investors React to Geographically Dispersed Information Shocks? A Test Using the COVID-19 Pandemic Disequilibrium Propagation of Quantity Constraints: Application to the COVID Lockdowns A Green Wave in Media, a Change of Tack in Stock Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1