An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall

Ruodu Wang, R. Zitikis
{"title":"An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall","authors":"Ruodu Wang, R. Zitikis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3423042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent Basel Accords, the expected shortfall (ES) replaces the value-at-risk (VaR) as the standard risk measure for market risk in the banking sector, making it the most popular risk measure in financial regulation. Although ES is—in addition to many other nice properties—a coherent risk measure, it does not yet have an axiomatic foundation. In this paper, we put forward four intuitive economic axioms for portfolio risk assessment—monotonicity, law invariance, prudence, and no reward for concentration—that uniquely characterize the family of ES. Therefore, the results developed herein provide the first economic foundation for using ES as a globally dominating regulatory risk measure, currently employed in Basel III/IV. Key to the main results, several novel notions such as tail events and risk concentration naturally arise, and we explore them in detail. As a most important feature, ES rewards portfolio diversification and penalizes risk concentration in a special and intuitive way, not shared by any other risk measure. This paper was accepted by Manel Baucells, decision analysis.","PeriodicalId":131191,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Risk Techniques (Sub-Topic)","volume":"26 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Risk Techniques (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3423042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

Abstract

In the recent Basel Accords, the expected shortfall (ES) replaces the value-at-risk (VaR) as the standard risk measure for market risk in the banking sector, making it the most popular risk measure in financial regulation. Although ES is—in addition to many other nice properties—a coherent risk measure, it does not yet have an axiomatic foundation. In this paper, we put forward four intuitive economic axioms for portfolio risk assessment—monotonicity, law invariance, prudence, and no reward for concentration—that uniquely characterize the family of ES. Therefore, the results developed herein provide the first economic foundation for using ES as a globally dominating regulatory risk measure, currently employed in Basel III/IV. Key to the main results, several novel notions such as tail events and risk concentration naturally arise, and we explore them in detail. As a most important feature, ES rewards portfolio diversification and penalizes risk concentration in a special and intuitive way, not shared by any other risk measure. This paper was accepted by Manel Baucells, decision analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预期短缺的公理基础
在最近的《巴塞尔协议》中,预期缺口(ES)取代风险价值(VaR)成为银行业市场风险的标准风险度量,使其成为金融监管中最受欢迎的风险度量。尽管ES——除了许多其他好的特性之外——是一种连贯的风险度量,但它还没有公理基础。本文提出了投资组合风险评估的四个直观的经济公理——单调性、律不变性、谨慎性和集中无回报,它们是ES家族的独特特征。因此,本文开发的结果为使用ES作为全球主导的监管风险措施提供了第一个经济基础,目前在巴塞尔协议III/IV中使用。关键的主要结果,一些新颖的概念,如尾部事件和风险集中自然出现,我们详细探讨了它们。作为最重要的特征,ES以一种特殊和直观的方式奖励投资组合多样化并惩罚风险集中,这是任何其他风险度量都无法共享的。这篇论文被Manel Baucells,决策分析所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frequency Dependent Risks in the Factor Zoo Valuing Real Options with Scale-dependent Payoff Rethinking Industry’s Role in a National Emergency Portfolio Value-at-Risk and Expected-Shortfall Using an Efficient Simulation Approach Based on Gaussian Mixture Model Volatility Persistence and Momentum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1