Cross-Listing and Corporate Governance: Bonding or Avoiding?

A. Licht
{"title":"Cross-Listing and Corporate Governance: Bonding or Avoiding?","authors":"A. Licht","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.382660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper questions the bonding hypothesis on cross-listing - namely, the idea that firms may want to list on a foreign stock market with a view to renting that market's superior corporate governance system. All too often, cross-listing studies are oblivious to the special structure of the U.S. regulatory regime, which governs foreign issuers. This paper highlights these features and provides a comprehensive survey of the extant empirical evidence. A critical review of this evidence reveals that an opposite, \"avoiding hypothesis\" more aptly describes firms' cross-listing behavior with regard to corporate governance issues. If anything, more stringent regimes deter issuers, and there is evidence that insiders behave opportunistically with regard to the cross-listing decision.","PeriodicalId":423843,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"246","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.382660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 246

Abstract

This paper questions the bonding hypothesis on cross-listing - namely, the idea that firms may want to list on a foreign stock market with a view to renting that market's superior corporate governance system. All too often, cross-listing studies are oblivious to the special structure of the U.S. regulatory regime, which governs foreign issuers. This paper highlights these features and provides a comprehensive survey of the extant empirical evidence. A critical review of this evidence reveals that an opposite, "avoiding hypothesis" more aptly describes firms' cross-listing behavior with regard to corporate governance issues. If anything, more stringent regimes deter issuers, and there is evidence that insiders behave opportunistically with regard to the cross-listing decision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉上市与公司治理:结合还是回避?
本文对交叉上市的绑定假说提出了质疑,即公司可能希望在外国股票市场上市,以租用该市场的优越公司治理体系。交叉上市研究往往忽略了美国监管制度的特殊结构,美国监管制度是针对外国发行人的。本文突出了这些特征,并对现有的经验证据进行了全面的调查。对这些证据的批判性回顾表明,一个相反的“回避假设”更贴切地描述了公司在公司治理问题上的交叉上市行为。如果有什么区别的话,那就是更严格的制度会阻止发行人,而且有证据表明,内部人士在交叉上市的决定上表现得很投机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do They Do It For The Money? Do Country Level Investor Protections Impact Security Level Contract Design? Evidence from Foreign Bond Covenants Innovation Activities and Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence on the Behaviour of Firms in the New EU Member States and Candidate Countries Directors' Duties Under the UK Companies Act 2006 and the Impact of the Company's Operations on the Environment Compensation Consultants and CEO Pay: UK Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1