Teaching and learning the legacy of residential schools for remembering and reconciliation in Canada

Cynthia Wallace-Casey
{"title":"Teaching and learning the legacy of residential schools for remembering and reconciliation in Canada","authors":"Cynthia Wallace-Casey","doi":"10.14324/herj.19.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2015, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of Canada released a Final Report containing 94 Calls to Action. Included were calls for reform in how history is taught in Canadian schools, so that students may learn to address such difficult topics in Canadian history as Indian Residential Schools, racism and cultural genocide. Operating somewhat in parallel to these reforms, social studies curricula across Canada have undergone substantial revisions. As a result, historical thinking is now firmly embedded within the curricula of most provinces and territories. Coupled with these developments are various academic debates regarding public pedagogy, difficult knowledge and student beliefs about Canada’s colonial past. Such debates require that researchers develop a better understanding of how knowledge related to Truth and Reconciliation is currently presented within Canadian classrooms, and how this may (or may not) relate to historical thinking. In this paper, I explore this debate as it relates to Indian Residential Schools. I then analyse a selection of classroom resources currently available in Canada for teaching about Truth and Reconciliation. In so doing, I consider how these relate to Peter Seixas’s six concepts of historical thinking (Seixas and Morton, 2013), as well as broader discussions within Canada about Indigenous world views, historical empathy and Reconciliation.","PeriodicalId":409544,"journal":{"name":"History Education Research Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History Education Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/herj.19.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In 2015, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of Canada released a Final Report containing 94 Calls to Action. Included were calls for reform in how history is taught in Canadian schools, so that students may learn to address such difficult topics in Canadian history as Indian Residential Schools, racism and cultural genocide. Operating somewhat in parallel to these reforms, social studies curricula across Canada have undergone substantial revisions. As a result, historical thinking is now firmly embedded within the curricula of most provinces and territories. Coupled with these developments are various academic debates regarding public pedagogy, difficult knowledge and student beliefs about Canada’s colonial past. Such debates require that researchers develop a better understanding of how knowledge related to Truth and Reconciliation is currently presented within Canadian classrooms, and how this may (or may not) relate to historical thinking. In this paper, I explore this debate as it relates to Indian Residential Schools. I then analyse a selection of classroom resources currently available in Canada for teaching about Truth and Reconciliation. In so doing, I consider how these relate to Peter Seixas’s six concepts of historical thinking (Seixas and Morton, 2013), as well as broader discussions within Canada about Indigenous world views, historical empathy and Reconciliation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教与学寄宿学校的遗产,以纪念与和解在加拿大
2015年,加拿大真相与和解委员会(TRC)发布了一份包含94项行动呼吁的最终报告。其中包括呼吁改革加拿大学校的历史教学方式,以便学生能够学会解决加拿大历史上的难题,如印第安寄宿学校、种族主义和文化种族灭绝。在某种程度上,与这些改革并行的是,加拿大各地的社会研究课程经历了实质性的修订。因此,历史思想现在已牢牢地嵌入大多数省份和地区的课程中。与这些发展相结合的是关于公共教育、困难知识和学生对加拿大殖民历史的看法的各种学术辩论。这样的争论要求研究人员更好地理解与真相与和解相关的知识目前是如何在加拿大课堂上呈现的,以及这可能(或可能不)与历史思维有什么关系。在本文中,我探讨了与印度寄宿学校有关的这一辩论。然后,我分析了加拿大目前可用的关于“真相与和解”教学的课堂资源。在此过程中,我考虑了这些与Peter Seixas的六个历史思维概念(Seixas and Morton, 2013)以及加拿大关于土著世界观、历史同理心和和解的更广泛讨论的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing historical empathy learning experiences: a pedagogical tool for history teachers Four design principles for student learning of substantive historical concepts – a realistic review study School trips to historical sites: students’ cognitive, affective and physical experiences from visits to Auschwitz Students’ views of historical significance – a narrative literature review The Great Irish Famine in Irish and UK history textbooks, 2010–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1