{"title":"Teaching and learning the legacy of residential schools for remembering and reconciliation in Canada","authors":"Cynthia Wallace-Casey","doi":"10.14324/herj.19.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2015, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of Canada released a Final Report containing 94 Calls to Action. Included were calls for reform in how history is taught in Canadian schools, so that students may learn to address such difficult topics in Canadian history as Indian Residential Schools, racism and cultural genocide. Operating somewhat in parallel to these reforms, social studies curricula across Canada have undergone substantial revisions. As a result, historical thinking is now firmly embedded within the curricula of most provinces and territories. Coupled with these developments are various academic debates regarding public pedagogy, difficult knowledge and student beliefs about Canada’s colonial past. Such debates require that researchers develop a better understanding of how knowledge related to Truth and Reconciliation is currently presented within Canadian classrooms, and how this may (or may not) relate to historical thinking. In this paper, I explore this debate as it relates to Indian Residential Schools. I then analyse a selection of classroom resources currently available in Canada for teaching about Truth and Reconciliation. In so doing, I consider how these relate to Peter Seixas’s six concepts of historical thinking (Seixas and Morton, 2013), as well as broader discussions within Canada about Indigenous world views, historical empathy and Reconciliation.","PeriodicalId":409544,"journal":{"name":"History Education Research Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History Education Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/herj.19.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
In 2015, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of Canada released a Final Report containing 94 Calls to Action. Included were calls for reform in how history is taught in Canadian schools, so that students may learn to address such difficult topics in Canadian history as Indian Residential Schools, racism and cultural genocide. Operating somewhat in parallel to these reforms, social studies curricula across Canada have undergone substantial revisions. As a result, historical thinking is now firmly embedded within the curricula of most provinces and territories. Coupled with these developments are various academic debates regarding public pedagogy, difficult knowledge and student beliefs about Canada’s colonial past. Such debates require that researchers develop a better understanding of how knowledge related to Truth and Reconciliation is currently presented within Canadian classrooms, and how this may (or may not) relate to historical thinking. In this paper, I explore this debate as it relates to Indian Residential Schools. I then analyse a selection of classroom resources currently available in Canada for teaching about Truth and Reconciliation. In so doing, I consider how these relate to Peter Seixas’s six concepts of historical thinking (Seixas and Morton, 2013), as well as broader discussions within Canada about Indigenous world views, historical empathy and Reconciliation.
2015年,加拿大真相与和解委员会(TRC)发布了一份包含94项行动呼吁的最终报告。其中包括呼吁改革加拿大学校的历史教学方式,以便学生能够学会解决加拿大历史上的难题,如印第安寄宿学校、种族主义和文化种族灭绝。在某种程度上,与这些改革并行的是,加拿大各地的社会研究课程经历了实质性的修订。因此,历史思想现在已牢牢地嵌入大多数省份和地区的课程中。与这些发展相结合的是关于公共教育、困难知识和学生对加拿大殖民历史的看法的各种学术辩论。这样的争论要求研究人员更好地理解与真相与和解相关的知识目前是如何在加拿大课堂上呈现的,以及这可能(或可能不)与历史思维有什么关系。在本文中,我探讨了与印度寄宿学校有关的这一辩论。然后,我分析了加拿大目前可用的关于“真相与和解”教学的课堂资源。在此过程中,我考虑了这些与Peter Seixas的六个历史思维概念(Seixas and Morton, 2013)以及加拿大关于土著世界观、历史同理心和和解的更广泛讨论的关系。