The paradox of supplier development in technology-based luxury supply chains

P. Barbieri, Brice Dattée, S. Mahapatra
{"title":"The paradox of supplier development in technology-based luxury supply chains","authors":"P. Barbieri, Brice Dattée, S. Mahapatra","doi":"10.1108/ijopm-11-2022-0703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to examine how collaborative supplier development (SD) activities, supplier capabilities and buyer–supplier relationship interrelate in technology-based, luxury product business contexts characterized by small volumes, difficult targets and resource constraints relative to those targets.Design/methodology/approachUsing inductive case research method, the authors investigate multiple embedded cases involving six dyadic buyer–supplier relationships of two luxury product manufacturers in the motorcycle and automotive industries. Each dyad represents an important sub-system for which the buying firm committed significant SD efforts to help the supplier successfully achieve difficult targets.FindingsThe analysis reveals how paradoxical tensions might emerge as the firms engage in successful SD activities, which could lead to decreasing relationship commitment ultimately resulting in the termination of the relationship. The authors utilize the “value co-creation and value capture” paradox framework to understand the SD and relationship dynamic and characterize it as developing-leveraging paradox to explain its dualities, i.e. commitment-based SD efforts (increasing value co-creation), and unilateral leveraging of the newly acquired capabilities (increasing value capture) by both the buyer and the supplier. Overemphasis on value capture by one of the exchange partners spurs a detrimental vicious cycle leading to the decline of the relationship.Research limitations/implicationsThe study explains the paradoxical dynamics that may emerge in SD activities of innovative, technologically complex, luxury product firms. The findings contribute to the SD literature by highlighting how learnings from SD activities could contribute to the dark sides of buyer–supplier relationship. The technologically complex, luxury product contextual characteristics of the study may limit the generalizability of the study findings.Originality/valueThe study provides novel insights into the emergence and management of paradoxes in buyer–supplier relationships, in terms of virtuous and vicious dynamics of developing-leveraging.","PeriodicalId":273410,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-11-2022-0703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to examine how collaborative supplier development (SD) activities, supplier capabilities and buyer–supplier relationship interrelate in technology-based, luxury product business contexts characterized by small volumes, difficult targets and resource constraints relative to those targets.Design/methodology/approachUsing inductive case research method, the authors investigate multiple embedded cases involving six dyadic buyer–supplier relationships of two luxury product manufacturers in the motorcycle and automotive industries. Each dyad represents an important sub-system for which the buying firm committed significant SD efforts to help the supplier successfully achieve difficult targets.FindingsThe analysis reveals how paradoxical tensions might emerge as the firms engage in successful SD activities, which could lead to decreasing relationship commitment ultimately resulting in the termination of the relationship. The authors utilize the “value co-creation and value capture” paradox framework to understand the SD and relationship dynamic and characterize it as developing-leveraging paradox to explain its dualities, i.e. commitment-based SD efforts (increasing value co-creation), and unilateral leveraging of the newly acquired capabilities (increasing value capture) by both the buyer and the supplier. Overemphasis on value capture by one of the exchange partners spurs a detrimental vicious cycle leading to the decline of the relationship.Research limitations/implicationsThe study explains the paradoxical dynamics that may emerge in SD activities of innovative, technologically complex, luxury product firms. The findings contribute to the SD literature by highlighting how learnings from SD activities could contribute to the dark sides of buyer–supplier relationship. The technologically complex, luxury product contextual characteristics of the study may limit the generalizability of the study findings.Originality/valueThe study provides novel insights into the emergence and management of paradoxes in buyer–supplier relationships, in terms of virtuous and vicious dynamics of developing-leveraging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术型奢侈品供应链中供应商发展的悖论
本文旨在研究在以技术为基础的奢侈品商业环境中,合作性供应商发展(SD)活动、供应商能力和买方-供应商关系是如何相互关联的,这些商业环境以小批量、困难目标和相对于这些目标的资源限制为特征。采用归纳案例研究方法,作者调查了涉及摩托车和汽车行业两家奢侈品制造商的六个二元买方-供应商关系的多个嵌入式案例。每一对代表一个重要的子系统,购买公司为帮助供应商成功实现困难的目标作出了重大的可持续发展努力。分析揭示了矛盾的紧张关系是如何在公司从事成功的可持续发展活动时出现的,这可能导致关系承诺的减少,最终导致关系的终止。作者利用“价值共同创造和价值获取”悖论框架来理解可持续发展和关系动态,并将其描述为发展-杠杆悖论来解释其二元性,即基于承诺的可持续发展努力(增加价值共同创造),以及买方和供应商单方面利用新获得的能力(增加价值获取)。交换伙伴中的一方过分强调价值获取,会引发恶性循环,导致双方关系的衰落。研究局限/启示本研究解释了创新的、技术复杂的奢侈品公司的可持续发展活动中可能出现的矛盾动态。这些发现通过强调从可持续发展活动中学习如何有助于改善买卖关系的阴暗面,为可持续发展文献做出了贡献。该研究的技术复杂性、奢侈品语境特征可能会限制研究结果的普遍性。原创性/价值本研究就发展-杠杆的良性和恶性动态,为买方-供应商关系中悖论的出现和管理提供了新颖的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geopolitical disruptions and supply chain structural ambidexterity Geopolitical disruptions and supply chain structural ambidexterity An experimental investigation of environmental knowledge sharing in a supply chain coopetition situation An experimental investigation of environmental knowledge sharing in a supply chain coopetition situation The influence of institutional logics on vaccine development, production and distribution in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1