Classification Model for Access Control Constraints

Mathias Kohler, C. Liesegang, A. Schaad
{"title":"Classification Model for Access Control Constraints","authors":"Mathias Kohler, C. Liesegang, A. Schaad","doi":"10.1109/PCCC.2007.358921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether access is given to a protected entity is decided upon evaluation of access control constraints. Though some initial approaches to classify access control constraints can be identified in the current literature, they must be considered as too broad with respect to today's multi-layered system landscapes. In this paper we present a classification model for authorization constraint types extracted from recent publications. We identify common restriction characteristics and classify the constraint types depending on their information sources necessary for constraint evaluation. We identified the following authorization classes: authentication, ontology, environment, and activity. We further propose a system architecture supporting these classes. We map our model architecture onto the Windows 2003 Authorization Manager, identify the components equal to our proposed architecture and emphasize which authorization classes are supported. We therefore show the applicability of our model to analyze existing authorization systems and determine the supported constraints.","PeriodicalId":356565,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCC.2007.358921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Whether access is given to a protected entity is decided upon evaluation of access control constraints. Though some initial approaches to classify access control constraints can be identified in the current literature, they must be considered as too broad with respect to today's multi-layered system landscapes. In this paper we present a classification model for authorization constraint types extracted from recent publications. We identify common restriction characteristics and classify the constraint types depending on their information sources necessary for constraint evaluation. We identified the following authorization classes: authentication, ontology, environment, and activity. We further propose a system architecture supporting these classes. We map our model architecture onto the Windows 2003 Authorization Manager, identify the components equal to our proposed architecture and emphasize which authorization classes are supported. We therefore show the applicability of our model to analyze existing authorization systems and determine the supported constraints.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
访问控制约束的分类模型
是否授予受保护实体访问权取决于对访问控制约束的评估。尽管在当前的文献中可以识别出一些对访问控制约束进行分类的初始方法,但它们必须被认为与当今的多层系统景观相比过于宽泛。在本文中,我们提出了一个从最近的出版物中提取的授权约束类型的分类模型。我们确定了常见的约束特征,并根据约束评估所需的信息源对约束类型进行分类。我们确定了以下授权类:身份验证、本体、环境和活动。我们进一步提出了一个支持这些类的系统架构。我们将模型体系结构映射到Windows 2003授权管理器,确定与我们建议的体系结构相等的组件,并强调支持哪些授权类。因此,我们展示了模型在分析现有授权系统和确定受支持的约束方面的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Profiling Database Application to Detect SQL Injection Attacks Protecting First-Level Responder Resources in an IP-based Emergency Services Architecture Scalable and Decentralized Content-Aware Dispatching in Web Clusters CT-RBAC: A Temporal RBAC Model with Conditional Periodic Time Mobility Support of Multi-User Services in Next Generation Wireless Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1