{"title":"Improving investor communications and analysis via standardization","authors":"Mike K Willis","doi":"10.4192/1577-8517-V7_6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over time, a market dialog of taxonomy extension best practices will improve\nconstituent communication and investor analysis and comparability assessments. A stated\ngoal/objective typically associated with the adoption of the Extensible Business Reporting\nLanguage (XBRL1 ) is the enhancement of information quality, specifically comparability.\nTerms often cited include 'Standard', 'Standardization' and 'Comparability'. This paper discusses\nthese three separate but related topics by clarifying common definitions, relationships, uses, and\nlimitations. The paper recognizes various comparability perceptions, and it demonstrates how\nXBRL enhances comparability and perhaps it takes it to a new level. Finally, the paper suggests\ncontinue dialog with market participants on best practices for further development of concepts\nrelevant to enhancing comparability.","PeriodicalId":404481,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-V7_6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Over time, a market dialog of taxonomy extension best practices will improve
constituent communication and investor analysis and comparability assessments. A stated
goal/objective typically associated with the adoption of the Extensible Business Reporting
Language (XBRL1 ) is the enhancement of information quality, specifically comparability.
Terms often cited include 'Standard', 'Standardization' and 'Comparability'. This paper discusses
these three separate but related topics by clarifying common definitions, relationships, uses, and
limitations. The paper recognizes various comparability perceptions, and it demonstrates how
XBRL enhances comparability and perhaps it takes it to a new level. Finally, the paper suggests
continue dialog with market participants on best practices for further development of concepts
relevant to enhancing comparability.