Suicidal Ideation as a Risk Factor of Suicide in Asian Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies

Fabiola Cathleen, Ayers Gilbert Ivano Kalaij, M. F. Soelaeman, Sarah Latifah Raharja
{"title":"Suicidal Ideation as a Risk Factor of Suicide in Asian Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies","authors":"Fabiola Cathleen, Ayers Gilbert Ivano Kalaij, M. F. Soelaeman, Sarah Latifah Raharja","doi":"10.47830/jinma-vol.73.3-2023-990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Suicide has become the third leading cause of death among individuals in their productive years, underscoring the pressing requirement for effective preventive measures and risk assessment strategies. Earlier studies have indicated that suicidal ideation may play a role as a risk factor of completing suicide. To bolster this understanding, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on the relationship between suicidal ideation and completed suicide within Asian populations. \nMethods: This review adopted a systematic approach, adhering to the four-phased PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram and checklist. Case-control studies were selected, focusing on samples of individuals aged 15-44 years who had received psychiatric care. Exclusion criteria included language barriers, incomplete or inaccessible texts, publications older than 2000, and participants with co-existing medical conditions that could interfere with the results. To assess the quality and potential bias of the included studies, the Oxford’s Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Case-Control Checklist and critical appraisal worksheet were utilized. \nResult: The search process yielded a total of 641 records, from which six studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. We found a statistically significant association between suicidal ideation and suicide (aOR 4.20; 95%CI 3.00-5.88, p<0.00001) with low heterogenity among the studies. The most common bias identified was related to the acceptability of case recruitment. \nConclusion: Suicidal ideation can act as a predictor of suicide risk in Asian populations. Incorporating the assessment of suicidal ideation in suicide prevention initiatives is critical for promptly identifying and intervening with individuals at risk.","PeriodicalId":378619,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of The Indonesian Medical Association","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of The Indonesian Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47830/jinma-vol.73.3-2023-990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Suicide has become the third leading cause of death among individuals in their productive years, underscoring the pressing requirement for effective preventive measures and risk assessment strategies. Earlier studies have indicated that suicidal ideation may play a role as a risk factor of completing suicide. To bolster this understanding, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on the relationship between suicidal ideation and completed suicide within Asian populations. Methods: This review adopted a systematic approach, adhering to the four-phased PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram and checklist. Case-control studies were selected, focusing on samples of individuals aged 15-44 years who had received psychiatric care. Exclusion criteria included language barriers, incomplete or inaccessible texts, publications older than 2000, and participants with co-existing medical conditions that could interfere with the results. To assess the quality and potential bias of the included studies, the Oxford’s Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Case-Control Checklist and critical appraisal worksheet were utilized. Result: The search process yielded a total of 641 records, from which six studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. We found a statistically significant association between suicidal ideation and suicide (aOR 4.20; 95%CI 3.00-5.88, p<0.00001) with low heterogenity among the studies. The most common bias identified was related to the acceptability of case recruitment. Conclusion: Suicidal ideation can act as a predictor of suicide risk in Asian populations. Incorporating the assessment of suicidal ideation in suicide prevention initiatives is critical for promptly identifying and intervening with individuals at risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自杀意念是亚洲国家自杀的危险因素:个案对照研究的系统回顾与元分析
导言:自杀已成为生育期个人死亡的第三大原因,因此迫切需要采取有效的预防措施和风险评估策略。早期的研究表明,自杀意念可能是完成自杀的一个危险因素。为了加强这一认识,我们对亚洲人群中自杀意念和自杀完成之间的关系进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:本综述采用系统方法,遵循四阶段PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)流程图和清单。选择病例对照研究,集中于15-44岁接受过精神科治疗的个体样本。排除标准包括语言障碍、不完整或难以理解的文本、2000年以前的出版物,以及同时存在可能影响结果的医疗条件的参与者。为了评估纳入研究的质量和潜在偏倚,使用了牛津大学关键评估技能计划(CASP)病例对照检查表和关键评估工作表。结果:检索过程共产生641条记录,其中6项研究最终纳入meta分析。我们发现自杀意念与自杀之间有统计学意义的关联(aOR 4.20;95%CI 3.00-5.88, p<0.00001),研究间异质性较低。发现的最常见的偏见与病例招募的可接受性有关。结论:自杀意念可作为亚洲人群自杀风险的预测因子。将自杀意念评估纳入自杀预防举措,对于迅速识别和干预处于危险中的个人至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Social Marketing in Preventing Non-Communicable Diseases: A Scoping Review Learning from the COVID-19 Pandemic Senam Asma Indonesia dalam Perspektif Rehabilitasi Medis Effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Children with Chronic Otitis Media: an Evidence-Based Case Report How Tuberculosis Scar Could Induce Lung Cancer? The Relationship between Parental Knowledge and Anxiety Levels towards COVID-19 Vaccination in Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1