Supply chain coordination contract design: The case of farmer with capital constraints and behavioral preferences

Y.L. Wang, X. Yin, X. Zheng, J. Cai, X. Fang
{"title":"Supply chain coordination contract design: The case of farmer with capital constraints and behavioral preferences","authors":"Y.L. Wang, X. Yin, X. Zheng, J. Cai, X. Fang","doi":"10.14743/apem2022.2.432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coordination mechanism design is an important issue in agricultural supply chain. This study investigates agricultural supply chain coordination contracts in the presence of output uncertainty. It considers a two-level supply chain comprising a farmer and a retailer, where the farmer faces capital constraints and shows stockout-averse (SA), waste-averse (WA), or stock-out- and waste-averse (SW) preferences. The results show that the retailer order, production input, and supply chain expected utility in the decentralized decision framework are lower than those realized under the centralized decision model; hence, the wholesale price contract cannot coordinate the supply chain. Nevertheless, the designed coordination contract mechanism coordinates the supply chain efficiently and realizes a flexible distribution of benefits between the farmer and the retailer. Furthermore, when the revenue-sharing coefficient meets specific conditions, both the farmer and the retailer achieve a win-win situation. Finally, we verify the coordination contract design using numerical simulations and analyze the effects of SA and WA preferences on decision-making and the supply chain expected utility. This study provides theoretical guidance for the coordination mechanism design of agricultural supply chain with capital constraints and behavioral preferences.","PeriodicalId":445710,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2022.2.432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Coordination mechanism design is an important issue in agricultural supply chain. This study investigates agricultural supply chain coordination contracts in the presence of output uncertainty. It considers a two-level supply chain comprising a farmer and a retailer, where the farmer faces capital constraints and shows stockout-averse (SA), waste-averse (WA), or stock-out- and waste-averse (SW) preferences. The results show that the retailer order, production input, and supply chain expected utility in the decentralized decision framework are lower than those realized under the centralized decision model; hence, the wholesale price contract cannot coordinate the supply chain. Nevertheless, the designed coordination contract mechanism coordinates the supply chain efficiently and realizes a flexible distribution of benefits between the farmer and the retailer. Furthermore, when the revenue-sharing coefficient meets specific conditions, both the farmer and the retailer achieve a win-win situation. Finally, we verify the coordination contract design using numerical simulations and analyze the effects of SA and WA preferences on decision-making and the supply chain expected utility. This study provides theoretical guidance for the coordination mechanism design of agricultural supply chain with capital constraints and behavioral preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链协调契约设计:具有资本约束和行为偏好的农民案例
协调机制设计是农业供应链中的一个重要问题。本文研究了存在产出不确定性的农业供应链协调契约问题。它考虑一个由农民和零售商组成的两级供应链,其中农民面临资本约束,并表现出不愿缺货(SA)、不愿浪费(WA)或不愿缺货和不愿浪费(SW)的偏好。结果表明:分散决策框架下的零售商订单、生产投入和供应链预期效用低于集中式决策框架下的预期效用;因此,批发价格合同无法协调供应链。然而,所设计的协调契约机制有效地协调了供应链,实现了农民和零售商之间利益的灵活分配。此外,当收益分享系数满足特定条件时,农民和零售商都实现了双赢。最后,利用数值模拟对协调契约设计进行了验证,并分析了SA和WA偏好对决策和供应链期望效用的影响。本研究为考虑资本约束和行为偏好的农业供应链协调机制设计提供了理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimizing smart manufacturing systems using digital twin IoT-based Deep Learning Neural Network (DLNN) algorithm for voltage stability control and monitoring of solar power generation Reduction of surface defects by optimization of casting speed using genetic programming: An industrial case study Incentive modeling analysis in engineering applications and projects with stochastic duration time Comparing Fault Tree Analysis methods combined with Generalized Grey Relation Analysis: A new approach and case study in the automotive industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1