The Real Nature of an Ecology of Separation

F. Neyrat
{"title":"The Real Nature of an Ecology of Separation","authors":"F. Neyrat","doi":"10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282586.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neyrat begins to lay out his proposal for an ecology of separation that does not simply embrace the positions of deep ecology or of eco-constructivism whereby everything is interconnected. Neyrat proposes to provide an alternative ecology that would allow for the necessary distance within the interconnectedness of things so as to exit the failure of the “Spinozist cure” and also allow for humans to not forget or repress, but rather to recognize and provide a place for an ecology of separation that recognizes that nature does indeed exist. An ecology of separation thereby counters what he names this “transcendental narcissism”— the replacement of nature by humanity (Anthropocene), and humanity’s translation into an over-arching conception of technology.","PeriodicalId":440579,"journal":{"name":"The Unconstructable Earth","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Unconstructable Earth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823282586.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neyrat begins to lay out his proposal for an ecology of separation that does not simply embrace the positions of deep ecology or of eco-constructivism whereby everything is interconnected. Neyrat proposes to provide an alternative ecology that would allow for the necessary distance within the interconnectedness of things so as to exit the failure of the “Spinozist cure” and also allow for humans to not forget or repress, but rather to recognize and provide a place for an ecology of separation that recognizes that nature does indeed exist. An ecology of separation thereby counters what he names this “transcendental narcissism”— the replacement of nature by humanity (Anthropocene), and humanity’s translation into an over-arching conception of technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分离生态的真实本质
Neyrat开始提出他关于分离生态学的建议,这种分离生态学不只是简单地接受深层生态学或生态建构主义的立场,即一切都是相互联系的。Neyrat建议提供另一种生态,允许在事物的相互联系中保持必要的距离,从而退出“斯宾诺莎疗法”的失败,也允许人类不要忘记或压抑,而是认识到并为分离的生态提供一个地方,承认自然确实存在。因此,分离的生态反对他所称的“先验自恋”——人类取代自然(人类世),以及人类转化为一种压倒一切的技术概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion Chapter 1. The Screen Of Geoengineering Chpater 9. The Technological Fervor Of Eco-Constructivism Chapter 5. An Ecology Of Resilience Chapter 12. Denaturing Nature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1